Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
L.V. Fil’kov, V.L. Kashevarov Lebedev Physical Institute Dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the pion NSTAR 2007
2
1. Introduction 2. 3. p n 4. 5. A A 6. Discussion 7. Summary NSTAR 2007
3
The dipole ( , ) and quadrupole ( , ) pion polarizabilities are defined through the expansion of the non-Born helicity amplitudes of the Compton scattering on the pion over t at s= s=(q 1 +k 1 ) 2, u=(q 1 –k 2 )2, t=(k 2 –k 1 ) 2 M ++ (s=μ 2,t 2(α 1 - β 1 ) + 1/6(α 2 - β 2 )t ] + O(t 2 ) M +- (s=μ 2,t 2(α 1 + β 1 ) + 1/6(α 2 +β 2 )t] + O(t 2 ) (α 1, β 1 and α 2, β 2 in units 10 -4 fm 3 and 10 -4 fm 5, respectively)
4
→ 0 0 L. Fil’kov, V. Kashevarov, Eur. Phys. J. A5, 285 (1999); Phys. Rev. C72, 035211 (2005)
5
s-channel: ρ(770), ω(782), φ(1020); t-channel: σ, f 0 (980), f 0 (1370), f 2 (1270), f 2 (1525) Free parameters: m σ, Γ σ, Γ σ→ , (α 1 -β 1 ), (α 1 +β 1 ), (α 2 -β 2 ), (α 2 +β 2 ) The σ-meson parameters were determined from the fit to the experimental data on the total cross section in the energy region 270 - 825 MeV. As a result we have found: m σ =(547± 45) MeV, Γ σ =(1204±362) MeV, Γ σ→ =(0.62±0.19) keV 0 meson polarizabilities have been determined in the energy region 270 - 2250 MeV. A repeated iteration procedure was used to obtain stable results.
6
The total cross section of the reaction → 0 0 H.Marsiske et al., Phys.Rev.D 41, 3324 (1990) J.K.Bienlein, 9-th Intern. Workshop on Photon-Photon Collisions, La Jolla (1992) our best fit
7
0 meson polarizabilities [1] L.Fil’kov, V. Kashevarov, Eur.Phys.J. A 5, 285 (1999) [2] L. Fil’kov, V. Kashevarov, Phys.Rev. C 72, 035211 (2005) [3] J. Gasser et al., Nucl.Phys. B728, 31 (2005) [4] A. Kaloshin et al., Z.Phys. C 64, 689 (1994) [5] A. Kaloshin et al., Phys.Atom.Nucl. 57, 2207 (1994) Two-loop ChPT calculations predict a positive value of (α 2 +β , in contrast to experimental result. One expects substantial correction to it from three-loop calculations.
8
+ p → + + + n (MAMI) J. Ahrens et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 23, 113 (2005)
9
where t = (p p –p n ) 2 = -2m p T n The cross section of p→ + n has been calculated in the framework of two different models: I.Contribution of all pion and nucleon pole diagrams. II.Contribution of pion and nucleon pole diagrams and (1232), P 11 (1440), D 13 (1520), S 11 (1535) resonances, and σ-meson.
10
To decrease the model dependence we limited ourselves to kinematical regions where the difference between model-1 and model-2 does not exceed 3% when (α 1 – β 1 =0. I. The kinematical region where the contribution of (α 1 – β 1 ) + is small: 1.5 2 < s 1 < 5 2 Model-1 Model-2 Fit of the experimental data The small difference between the theoretical curves and the experimental data was used for a normalization of the experimental data.
11
II. The kinematical region where the (α 1 – β 1 ) + contribution is substantial: < s 1 < 15 2, -12 2 < t < -2 2 (α 1 – β 1 ) + = (11.6 ± 1.5 st ± 3.0 sys ± 0.5 mod ) 10 -4 fm 3 ChPT (Gasser et al. (2006)) : (α 1 –β 1 (5.7±1.0) 10 -4 fm 3
12
→+ - →+ - L.V. Fil’kov, V.L. Kashevarov, Phys. Rev. C 73, 035210 (2006) Old analyses: energy region 280 - 700 MeV (α 1 -β 1 ) ± = 4.4 - 52.6 Our analysis: energy region 280 - 2500 MeV, DRs at fixed t with one subtraction at s= 2, DRs with two subtraction for the subtraction functions, subtraction constants were defined through the pion polarizabilities. s-channel: ρ(770), b 1 (1235), a 1 (1260), a 2 (1320) t-channel: σ, f 0 (980), f 0 (1370), f 2 (1270), f 2 (1525) Free parameters: (α 1 -β 1 ) ±, (α 1 +β 1 ) ±, (α 2 -β 2 ) ±, (α 2 +β 2 ) ±
13
Charged pion polarizabilities [1] L. Fil’kov, V. Kashevarov, Phys. Rev. C 72, 035211 ( 2005). [2] J. Gasser et all., Nucl. Phys. B 745, 84 (2006).
14
Total cross section of the process → our best fit Born contribution calculations with α 1 and β 1 from ChPT fit with α 1 and β 1 from ChPT
15
Angular distributions of the differential cross sections Mark II – 90 CELLO - 92 ╬ VENUS - 95 Calculations using our fit |cos *| d /d(|cos *|<0.6) (nb) : Bürgi-97, : our fit , Gasser-06
16
A → A t 10 (GeV/c) 2 dominance of Coulomb bremsstrahlung t 10 Coulomb and nuclear contributions are of similar size t 10 2 dominance of nuclear bremsstrahlung Serpukhov (1983): Yu.M. Antipov et al., Phys.Lett. B121, 445(1983) E 1 =40 GeV Be, C, Al, Fe, Cu, Pb |t| < 6x10 4 (GeV/c) 2 : 13.6 2.8 2.4 2 /E 1
17
Charged pion dipole polarizabilities
18
Dispersion sum rules for the pion polarizabilities
19
The DSR predictions for the charged pions polarizabilities in units 10 -4 fm 3 for dipole and 10 -4 fm 5 quadrupole polarizabilities. The DSR predictions for the meson polarizabilities
20
Contribution of vector mesons ChPT DSR
21
Discussion 1.(α 1 - β 1 ) ± The σ meson gives a big contribution to DSR for (α 1 –β 1 ). However, it was not taken into account in the ChPT calculations. Different contributions of vector mesons to DSR and ChPT. 2. one-loop two-loops experiment (α 2 -β 2 ) ± = 11.9 16.2 [21.6] 25 +0.8-0.3 The LECs at order p 6 are not well known. The two-loop contribution is very big (~100%). 3.(α 1, 2 +β 1, 2 ) ± Calculations at order p 6 determine only the leading order term in the chiral expansion. Contributions at order p 8 could be essential.
22
Summary 1.The values of the dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of 0 have been found from the analysis of the data on the process → 0 0. 2.The values of (α 1 ± β 1 ) 0 and (α 2 –β 2 ) 0 do not conflict within the errors with the ChPT prediction. 3. Two-loop ChPT calculations have given opposite sign for (α 2 +β 2 ) 0. 4. The value of (α 1 –β 1 ) ± =13.0+2.6-1.9 found from the analysis of the data on the process → + - is consisted with results obtained at MAMI (2005) ( p→ + n), Serpukhov (1983) Z → Z), and Lebedev Phys. Inst. (1984) ( p→ + n). 5. However, all these results are at variance with the ChPT predictions. One of the reasons of such a deviation could be neglect of the σ- meson contribution in the ChPT calculations. 6. The values of the quadrupole polarizabilities (α 2 ±β 2 ) ± disagree with the present two-loop ChPT calculations. 7. All values of the polarizabilities found agree with the DSR predictions.
23
and contributions to 1 – 1 ( 1 1 ) ±
24
contribution to DSR
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.