Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Density Functional Study of the Insertion Mechanism in MAO (Methylaluminoxane)- Activated, Cp 2 ZrMe 2 -Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization Eva Zurek, Tom.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Density Functional Study of the Insertion Mechanism in MAO (Methylaluminoxane)- Activated, Cp 2 ZrMe 2 -Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization Eva Zurek, Tom."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Density Functional Study of the Insertion Mechanism in MAO (Methylaluminoxane)- Activated, Cp 2 ZrMe 2 -Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization Eva Zurek, Tom Ziegler*, University of Calgary

2 Computational Details DFT Calculations: performed with ADF 2.3.3 and 2000. Functional: LDA along with gradient corrected exchange functional of Becke; correlation functional of Perdew. Basis-set: double-  STO basis with one polarization function for H, C, Al, O; triple-  STO basis with one polarization function for Zr. Solvation: COnductor-like Screening Model (COSMO). Transition States: geometry optimizations along a fixed reaction coordinate. TS where gradient less than convergence criteria. For insertion barriers this is C  -C ethylene distance.

3 Single-Site Homogeneous Catalysis Catalysts: L 1 L 2 MR 1 R 2 ; L=Cp, NPR 3, NCR 2 ; M=Ti, Zr, R=methyl, propyl, etc. Co-Catalyst (Anion): B(C 6 F 5 ) 3, MAO (Methylaluminoxane) MAO + Cp 2 Zr(CH 3 ) 2  Cp 2 ZrCH 3 + + MAOMe -

4 ‘Pure MAO’ Percent Distribution average unit formula of (AlOMe) 18.41, (AlOMe) 17.23, (AlOMe) 16.89, (AlOMe) 15.72 at 198K, 298K, 398K and 598K

5 ‘Real’ (TMA-Containing) MAO

6 Reactive MAO (R-MAO) Cages

7 Active & Dormant Species Active Species: [Cp 2 ZrMe] + [AlMe 3 Me(R-MAO)] - Dormant Species: [Cp 2 ZrMe] + [Me(R-MAO)] -

8 Possible Mechanisms Trans Approach: ‘Dissociative’ Transition State Cis Approach: ‘Associative’ Transition State

9 First Insertion: ‘Dormant’ Species Zr-O: 3.658 Zr-O: 4.539 Cis-Attack Trans-Attack Zr-O: 4.209 Zr-O: 3.336 Transition State  E gas = 38.80 kcal/mol  E toluene = 35.55 kcal/mol  -complex  E gas = 31.88 kcal/mol  E toluene = 28.43 kcal/mol  -complex  E gas = 34.65 kcal/mol  E toluene = 26.96 kcal/mol Transition State  E gas = 35.37 kcal/mol  E toluene = 29.26 kcal/mol

10 First Insertion: ‘Active’ Species Cis-Attack Trans-Attack Zr-Me: 3.999 Zr-Me: 4.108  -complex  E gas = 20.73 kcal/mol  E toluene = 16.22 kcal/mol Transition State  E gas = 21.87 kcal/mol  E toluene = 17.00 kcal/mol Transition State  E gas = 16.63 kcal/mol  E toluene = 18.36 kcal/mol  -complex  E gas = 14.97 kcal/mol  E toluene = 12.32 kcal/mol Zr-Me: 3.938Zr-Me: 2.501

11 Second Insertion: Trans  -complexes 15.26 kcal/mol 13.69 kcal/mol 4.161Å 4.387Å 9.13 kcal/mol 4.652Å 10.93 kcal/mol 4.637Å 4.405Å 19.19 kcal/mol 4.229Å 26.61 kcal/mol, gas

12 Second Insertion: Cis  -complexes 4.343Å 4.792Å 9.73 kcal/mol 4.819Å 9.30 kcal/mol 4.169Å 19.28 kcal/mol 14.48 kcal/mol 4.326Å 15.58 kcal/mol 3.988 Å 17.70 kcal/mol (gas)

13 Second Insertion: Trans TS Transition State  E gas = 22.29 kcal/mol  E toluene = 24.11 kcal/mol Transition State  E gas = 21.26kcal/mol  E toluene = 16.40 kcal/mol Zr-Me: 2.517ÅZr-Me:4.658Å  -complex  E gas = 18.70 kcal/mol  E toluene = 13.69 kcal/mol

14 Second Insertion: Cis TS Zr-Me: 2.503Å Transition State  E gas = 16.39 kcal/mol  E toluene = 18.25 kcal/mol Transition State  E gas = 21.81kcal/mol  E toluene = 16.85 kcal/mol Zr-Me:4.925Å Transition State  E gas = 20.05 kcal/mol  E toluene = 14.90 kcal/mol Zr-Me:4.089Å

15 Comparison with Free Cation  -agostic TS  -agostic TS

16 Do the Cation & Anion Associate? Transition StateAssociated Product

17 Conclusions [Cp 2 ZrMe] + [AlMe 3 Me(R-MAO)] - is an active species and [Cp 2 ZrMe] + [Me(R-MAO)] - is a dormant species (‘R-MAO’ is one of the seven reactive MAO cages) in olefin polymerization First insertion: - cis-approach has an associated TS; trans-approach has a dissociated TS - trans-approach has lower insertion barrier Second insertion: -  -complexes with a  -agostic bond are more stable than those with an  -agostic or with no agostic bonds - associated TS’s are higher in energy than dissociated TS’s - trans-approach with  -agostic bond yields no insertion barrier; uptake barrier must be found - lower barrier than first insertion

18 Future Work: - to finish calculating uptake & insertion barriers for the second insertion; examine termination barriers. Acknowledgements: - Kumar Vanka, Artur Michalak, Michael Seth, Hans Martin Senn, Zhitao Xu and other members of the Ziegler Research Group for their help and fruitful discussions - Novacor Research and Technology (NRTC) of Calgary ($$$) - NSERC ($$$) - Alberta Ingenuity Fund ($$$) Miscellaneous


Download ppt "A Density Functional Study of the Insertion Mechanism in MAO (Methylaluminoxane)- Activated, Cp 2 ZrMe 2 -Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization Eva Zurek, Tom."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google