Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
1 Chemical Bonds are lines Surface is Electrical Potential Red is positive Blue is negative Chemist’s Vie w Ion Channels Proteins with a Hole All Atoms View Figure by Raimund Dutzler ~30 Å
2
2 Channels form a class of Biological Systems that can be analyzed with Physics as Usual Physics-Mathematics-Engineering are the proper language for Ion Channels in my opinion ION CHANNELS: Proteins with a Hole
3
3 Physics as Usual along with Biology as Usual Ion Channels can be analyzed with “Why think?. Exhaustively experiment. Then, think” Claude Bernard Appropriate when nothing was known of Inverse Problems! Cited in The Great Influenza, John M. Barry, Viking Penguin Group 2004
4
4 Channels control flow in and out of cells ION CHANNELS as Biological Objects ~5 µm
5
5 ~30 Å Ion Channels are the Main Molecular Controllers “Valves” of Biological Function Figure by Raimund Dutzler
6
6 Channels control flow of Charged Spheres Channels have Simple Invariant Structure on the biological time scale. Why can’t we predict the movement of Charged Spheres through a Hole? ION CHANNELS as Physical Devices
7
7 Physical Characteristics of Ion Channels Natural Nanodevices Ion channels have Selectivity. K channel selects K + over Na + by ~10 4. Ion channels Gate/Switch in response to pH, voltage, chemical species and mechanical force from conducting to nonconducting state. Ion channels have VERY Large Charge Densities critical to I-V characteristics and selectivity (and gating?) Ion channels allow Mutations that modify conductance, selectivity, and function. Ion channels are Device Elements that self-assemble into perfectly reproducible arrays. Ion channels form Templates for design of bio-devices and biosensors. ~30Å Figure by Raimund Dutzler
8
8 Channels Control Macroscopic Flow with Atomic Resolution ION CHANNELS as Technological Objects
9
9 Ion Channels are Important Enough to be Worth the Effort
10
10 Goal: Predict Function From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws
11
11 Current in One Channel Molecule is a Random Telegraph Signal
12
Voltage Step Applied Here (+ 80 mV; 1M KCl) Gating: Opening of Porin Trimer John Tang Rush Medical Center
13
13 Single Channel Currents have little variance John Tang Rush Medical Center
14
14 Lipid Bilayer Setup Recordings from a Single Molecule Conflict of Interest
15
15 Patch clamp and Bilayer apparatus clamp ion concentrations in the baths and the voltage across membranes. Patch Clamp Setup Recordings from One Molecule
16
16 Voltage in baths Concentration in baths Fixed Charge on channel protein Current depends on John Tang Rush Medical Center OmpF KCl 1M 1M || G119D KCl 1M 1M || ompF KCl 0.05 M 0.05M || G119D KCl 0.05 M 0.05M || Bilayer Setup
17
17 Current depends on type of ion Selectivity John Tang Rush Medical Center OmpF KCl 1M 1M || OmpF CaCl 2 1M 1M || Bilayer Setup
18
18 Goal: Predict Function From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws
19
19 Structures… Location of charges are known with atomic precision (~0.1 Å) in favorable cases.
20
20 Charge Mutation in Porin Ompf Structure determined by x-ray crystallography in Tilman Schirmer’s lab Figure by Raimund Dutzler G119D
21
21 Goal: Predict Function From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws
22
22 But … What are the Fundamental Physical ‘Laws’?
23
23 Verbal Models Are Popular with Biologists but Inadequate
24
24 James Clerk Maxwell “I carefully abstain from asking molecules where they start… I only count them…., avoiding all personal enquiries which would only get me into trouble.” Royal Society of London, 1879, Archives no. 188 In Maxwell on Heat and Statistical Mechanics, Garber, Brush and Everitt, 1995
25
25 I fear Biologists indulge themselves with verbal models of molecules where Maxwell abstained
26
26 Verbal Models are Vague and Difficult to Test
27
27 Verbal Models lead to Interminable Argument and Interminable Investigation
28
28 thus, to Interminable Funding
29
29 and so Verbal Models Are Popular
30
30 Can Molecular Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Only if they count correctly !
31
31 It is very difficult for Molecular Dynamics to count well enough to reproduce Conservation Laws (e.g., of number, energy) Concentration (i.e., number density) or activity Energy of Electric Field Ohm’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Fick’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Fluctuations in number density (e.g., entropy)
32
32 Can Molecular Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Only if Calibrated!
33
33 Calibrated Molecular Dynamics may be possible MD without Periodic Boundary Conditions ─ HNC HyperNetted Chain Pair Correlation Function in Bulk Solution Saraniti Lab, IIT: Aboud, Marreiro, Saraniti & Eisenberg
34
34 Calibrated Molecular Dynamics may be possible MD without Periodic Boundary Conditions BioMOCA ─ E quilibrium M onte C arlo (ala physical chemistry) Pair Correlation Function in Bulk Solution van der Straaten, Kathawala, Trellakis, Eisenberg & Ravaioli
35
35 Calibrated MD may be possible, even in a Gramicidin channel Molecular Dynamics without Periodic Boundary Conditions BioMOCA van der Straaten, Kathawala, Trellakis, Eisenberg & Ravaioli Simulations 235ns to 300ns, totaling 4.3 μs. Mean I = 3.85 pA, 24 Na + crossings per 1 μs 16 Na + single channel currents
36
36 Essence of Engineering is knowing What Variables to Ignore! WC Randels quoted in Warner IEEE Trans CT 48:2457 (2001) Until Mathematics of Simulations is available we take an Engineering Approach
37
37 What variables should we ignore when we make low resolution models? How can we tell when a model is helpful? Use the scientific method Guess and Check! Intelligent Guesses are MUCH more efficient Sequence of unintelligent guesses may not converge! (e.g., Rate/State theory of channels/proteins)
38
38 Use the scientific method Guess and Check! Intelligent Guesses are MUCH more efficient When theory works, need few checks ‘guesses’ are almost as good as experiments. Mechanical Engineering, Electricity, Computer Science, Hydrodynamics, in
39
39 Use Theory of Inverse Problems to replace or optimize “Guess and Check” 1) Measure only what can be measured (e.g., not two resistors in parallel). 2) Measure what determines important parameters. 3) Use efficient estimators. 4) Use estimators with known bias 5) no matter what the theory, Be clever in estimation
40
40 Channels are only Holes Why can’t we have a fully successful theory? Must know physical basis to make a good theory Physical Basis of Gating is not known Physical Basis of Permeation is known, in my opinion.
41
41 Proteins Bristle with Charge Cohn (1920’s) & Edsall (1940’s) Ion Channels are no exception We start with Electrostatics because of biology
42
42 Many atoms in a protein have Permanent Charge ~1e Permanent charge is the (partial) charge on the atom when the local electric field is zero. Active Sites in Proteins have Many Charges in a Small Place
43
43 −0.55O 0.35HH_22 0.60C 0.50C_z 0.35HH_21 −0.45NH_2 0.35HH_12 −0.45NH_1 0.35HH_11 0.32 Average Magnitude 0.30H_e −0.40N_e 0.10C_d 0.00C_g 0.00C_b 0.10C_a 0.25H −0.40N Charge (units / e) Atom in Arginine Charge according to CHARMM
44
44 Active Sites of Proteins are Very Charged e.g. 7 charges ~ 20 M net charge Selectivity Filters and Gates of Ion Channels are Active Sites 1 nM = 1.2×10 22 cm -3
45
45 Small Charge in Small Places Large Potentials * Start with electrostatics because * 500 µvolt has significant effect on IV curve in a Sphere of diameter 14 Å 1 charge gives V at psec times; dielectric constant = 2 mV at µsec times; dielectric constant = 80
46
46 We start without quantum chemistry* (only at first) * i.e., delocalization of orbitals of outer electrons
47
47 Although we start with electrostatics We will soon add Physical Models of Chemical Effects
48
48 It is appropriate to be skeptical of analysis in which the only chemistry is physical But give me a chance, ask I will be in Linz for a week! (thanks to Heinz!) Or email beisenbe@rush.edu for the papers
49
49 Very Different from Traditional Structural Biology which, more or less, ignores Electrostatics
50
50 Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) Lowest resolution theory that includes Electrostatics and Flux is (probably) PNP, Gouy-Chapman, (nonlinear) Poisson-Boltzmann, Debye-Hückel, are fraternal twins or siblings with similar resolution
51
51 ION CHANNEL MODELS Poisson’s Equation Continuity Equation & Drift - Diffusion For Derivation …Stay tuned Schuss, Singer, Nadler et al Electrochemical Potential includes Fixed Charge on Protein includes only Mobile Charge
52
52 One Dimensional PNP Poisson’s Equation Drift-Diffusion & Continuity Equation includes Fixed Charge on Protein includes only Mobile Charge Electrochemical Potential
53
53 The Problem ionic concentrations, electrostatic potential held constant far from channel membrane with ion channel ionic concentrations, electrostatic potential held constant far from channel
54
54 Bath Membrane Boundary conditions are Crucial Flared Access to Channel Required in 1D
55
55 I V INPUT OUTPUT THEORY PNP STRUCTURE Length, diameter, Permanent Charge Dielectric Coefficient EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS Bath concentrations Bath Potential Difference PNP Forward Problem
56
56 Current Voltage Relation Gramicidin 3D PNP Uwe Hollerbach
57
57 V I PNP -1 Inverse Problem Input Output Theory EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS Bath Concentrations Bath Potential Difference EXPERIMENTS ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE Length, diameter, Permanent Charge Dielectric Coefficient PNP -1 Inverse Problem for Mathematicians What measurements best determine electrical structure?
58
58 Charge Mutation in Porin Ompf Structure determined by x-ray crystallography in Tilman Schirmer’s lab G119D
59
59 Fit of 1D PNP Current-Voltage 100 mM KCl OmpF G119D Duan Chen John Tang Rush Medical Center
60
60 Net Charge Difference = 0.13 1.1 = 0.97e Duan Chen John Tang
61
61 Shielding Dominates Electric Properties of Channels, Proteins, as it does Ionic Solutions Shielding is ignored in traditional treatments of Ion Channels and of Active Sites of proteins Main Qualitative Result
62
62 Main Qualitative Result Shielding in Gramicidin Uwe Hollerbach Rush Medical Center
63
63 PNP misfits in some cases even with ‘optimal’ nonuniform D(x) Duan Chen John Tang Rush Medical Center
64
64 Shielding/PNP is not enough PNP includes Correlations only in the Mean Field PNP ignores ion- ion correlations and discrete particle effects: Single Filing, Crowded Charge Dielectric Boundary Force
65
65 Neither Field Theory nor Statistical Mechanics easily accommodates Finite Size of Ions and Protein Side-chains How can that be changed? Learn from Mathematicians and/or Physical Chemists Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
66
66 Learning with Mathematicians Zeev Schuss, Boaz Nadler, Amit Singer Dept’s of Mathematics Tel Aviv University, Yale University Molecular Biophysics, Rush Medical College We extend usual chemical treatment to include flux and spatially nonuniform boundary conditions We have concrete results only in the uncorrelated case! We have learned how to derive PNP (by mathematics alone). Count trajectories not states
67
67 Counting Langevin Trajectories in a Channel (between absorbing boundary conditions ) implies PNP (with some differences) PNP measures the density of trajectories (nearly) Zeev Schuss, Amit Singer: Tel Aviv Univ Boaz Nadler: Yale Univ,
68
68 Conditional PNP Electric Force depends on Conditional Density of Charge Nernst-Planck gives UNconditional Density of Charge mass friction Schuss, Nadler, Eisenberg
69
69 Boaz Nadler and Uwe Hollerbach Yale University Dept of Mathematics & Rush Medical Center Dielectric Boundary Force DBF PNP ignores correlations induced by Discovered by Coalson/Kurnikova, Chung/Corry, … not us
70
70 Counting gives PNP with corrections 1)Correction for Dielectric Boundary Force* 2) NP (diffusion) equation describes probability of location but 3) Poisson equation depends on a conditional probability of location of charge, i.e., probability of location of trajectories, given that a positive ion is in a definite location. 4) Relation of is not known but can be estimated by closure relations, as in equilibrium statistical mechanics. 5) Closure relations involve correlations from single filing, finite volume of ions, boundary conditions, not well understood, … yet. Stay Tuned! *by derivation, not assumption
71
71 Until mathematics is available, we Follow the Physical Chemists, even if their approximations are ‘irrational’, i.e., do not have error bounds. Bob Eisenberg blames only himself for this approach
72
72 Physical Chemistry has shown that Chemically Specific Properties of ions come from their Diameter and Charge (much) more than anything else. Physical Models are Enough Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
73
73 Physical Theories of Plasma of Ions Determine (±1-2%) Activity* of ionic solutions from Infinite dilution, to Saturated solutions, even in Ionic melts. *Free Energy per Mole Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
74
74 } Concentration-independent geometric restrictions solvation (Born) terms Ideal term electrochemical potential of point particles in the electrostatic mean-field includes Poisson equation Excess chemical potential Finite size effects Spatial correlations Chemical potential has three components
75
75 Simplest Physical Theory MSA Electrostatic Spheres Hard Spheres Ionic radii I are known values in bulk Learned from Lesser Blum & Doug Henderson … Thanks! We use Simonin/Turq formulation.
76
76 Properties of Highly Compressible Plasma of Ions Similar Results are computed by many Different theories and Simulations MSA is only simplest. We (and others) have used MSA, SPM, MC, and DFT MSA : M ean S pherical A pproximation SPM: S olvent P rimitive M odel MC: M ont e C arlo Simulation DFT: D ensity F unctiona l T heory of Solutions Most Accurate Atomic Detail Calibrated ! Inhomogeneous Systems
77
77 back to channels Selectivity in Channels Wolfgang Nonner, Dirk Gillespie University of Miami and Rush Medical Center
78
78 Binding Curve Wolfgang Nonner
79
79 O½O½ Selectivity Filter Selectivity Filter Crowded with Charge Wolfgang Nonner
80
80 Understand Selectivity well enough to Make a Calcium Channel using techniques of molecular genetics, site-directed Mutagenesis Goal: George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg
81
81 General Biological Theme (‘adaptation’) Selectivity Arises in a Crowded Space Biological case: 0.1 M NaCl and 1 M CaCl 2 in the baths As the volume is decreased, water is excluded from the filter by crowded charge effects Ca 2+ enters the filter and displaces Na + Biological Case Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
82
82 Sensitivity to Parameters Volume Dielectric Coefficient
83
83 Trade-offs ‘1. 5’ adjustable parameters Volume Dielectric Coefficient
84
84 Binding Curves Sensitivity to Parameters 0.75 nm 3 volume 0.20 nm 3 volume
85
85 At Large Volumes Electrical Potential can Reverse 0.75 nm 3 volume 0.20 nm 3 volume - - 0 Potential- - 0 Potential Positive Negative
86
86 Competition of Metal Ions vs. Ca ++ in L-type Ca Channel Nonner & Eisenberg
87
87 Similar Results have been found by Henderson, Boda, et al. Hansen, Melchiona, Allen, et al., Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg, et al., Using MSA, SPM, MC and DFT for the L-type Ca Channel MSA: Mean Spherical Approximation SPM: Solvent Primitive Model MC: Monte Carlo Simulation DFT: Density Functional Theory of Solutions Atomic Detail Calibrated! Most Accurate Inhomogeneous Systems
88
88 Best Result to Date with Atomic Detail Monte Carlo, including Dielectric Boundary Force Dezso Boda, Dirk Gillespie, Doug Henderson, Wolfgang Nonner Na + Ca ++
89
89 Other Properties of Ion Channels are likely to involve more subtle physics including orbital delocalization and chemical binding Selectivity apparently does not! Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
90
90 Ionic Selectivity in Protein Channels Crowded Charge Mechanism Simplest Version: MSA How does Crowded Charge give Selectivity?
91
91 General Biological Theme (‘adaptation’) Selectivity Arises in a Crowded Space Biological case: 0.1 M NaCl and 1 M CaCl 2 in the baths As the volume is decreased, water is excluded from the filter by crowded charge effects Ca 2+ enters the filter and displaces Na + Biological Case Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
92
92 Ionic Selectivity in Protein Channels Crowded Charge Mechanism 4 Negative Charges of glutamates of protein DEMAND 4 Positive Charges nearby either 4 Na + or 2 Ca ++
93
93 Ionic Selectivity in Protein Channels Crowded Charge Mechanism Simplest Version: MSA 2 Ca ++ are LESS CROWDED than 4 Na +, Ca ++ SHIELDS BETTER than Na +, so Protein Prefers Calcium
94
94 2 Ca ++ are LESS CROWDED than 4 Na +
95
95 What does the protein do? Selectivity arises from Electrostatics and Crowding of Charge Certain MEASURES of structure are Powerful DETERMINANTS of Function e.g., Volume, Dielectric Coefficient, etc. Precise Arrangement of Atoms is not involved in the model, to first order.
96
96 Protein provides Mechanical Strength Volume of Pore Dielectric Coefficient/Boundary Permanent Charge Precise Arrangement of Atoms is not involved in the model, to first order. but Particular properties (‘measures’) of the protein are crucial! What does the protein do?
97
97 Mechanical Strength Volume of Pore Dielectric Coefficient/Boundary Permanent Charge But not the precise arrangement of atoms Implications for Artificial Channels Design Goals are
98
98 Implications for Traditional Biochemistry Traditional Biochemistry focuses on Particular locations of atoms
99
99 Traditional Biochemistry assumes Rate Constants Independent of Concentration & Conditions
100
100 Implications for Traditional Biochemistry Traditional Biochemistry (more or less) Ignores the Electric Field
101
101 But Rate Constants depend steeply on Concentration and Electrical Properties* because of shielding, a fundamental property of matter, independent of model, in my opinion. *nearly always
102
102 Electrostatic Contribution to ‘Dissociation Constant’ is large and is an Important Determinant of Biological Properties Change of Dissociation ‘Constant’ with concentration is large and is an Important Determinant of Biological Properties
103
103 Traditional Biochemistry ignores Shielding and Crowded Charge although Shielding Dominates Properties of Ionic Solutions and cannot be ignored in Channels and Proteins in my opinion
104
104 Make a Calcium Channel using techniques of molecular genetics, site-directed Mutagenesis How can we use these ideas? George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg BioMaDe Corporation, Groningen, Netherlands
105
105 More?
106
106 Function can be predicted From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws (sometimes, in some cases).
107
107 Strategy Use site-directed mutagenesis to put in extra glutamates and create an EEEE locus in the selectivity filter of OmpF Site-directed mutagenesis R132 R82 E42 E132 R42 A82 Wild typeEAE mutant E117 D113 George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg BioMaDe Corporation, Groningen, Netherlands
108
108 Zero-current potential or reversal potential = measure of ion selectivity Henk Mediema Wim Meijberg
109
109 Ca 2+ over Cl - selectivity (P Ca /P Cl ) recorded in 1 : 0.1 M CaCl 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS (1) Conclusions: - Taking positive charge out of the constriction zone ( = -3, see control mutant AAA) enhances the cation over anion permeability. - Putting in extra negative charge ( = -5, see EAE mutant) further increases the cation selectivity. Henk Mediema Wim Meijberg
110
110 Ca 2+ over Na + selectivity (P Ca /P Na ) recorded in 0.1 M NaCl : 0.1 M CaCl 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS (2) Conclusion: - Compared to WT, EAE shows just a moderate increase of the Ca 2+ over Na + selectivity. - To further enhance P Ca /P Na may require additional negative charge and/or a change of the ‘dielectric volume’. Work in Progress! Henk Mediema Wim Meijberg
111
111 Selectivity Differs in Different Types of Channels Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie Other Types of Channels
112
112 Ca channel Na channel Cl channel K channel prefers Small ions Ca 2+ > Na + prefers Small ions Na + > Ca 2+ Na + over K + prefers Large ions prefers K + > Na + Selectivity filter EEEE 4 − charges Selectivity filter DEKA 2 −, 1+ charge Selectivity filter hydrophobic partial charges Selectivity filter single filing partial charges PNP/DFTMonte CarloBulk ApproxNot modeled yet Selectivity of Different Channel Types The same crowded charge mechanism can explain all these different channel properties with surprisingly little extra physics.
113
113 Sodium Channel (with D. Boda, D. Busath, and D. Henderson) Related to Ca ++ channel removing the positive lysine (K) from the DEKA locus makes calcium-selective channel High Na + selectivity 1 mM CaCl 2 in 0.1 M NaCl gives all Na + current (compare to calcium channel) only >10 mM CaCl 2 gives substantial Ca ++ current Monte Carlo method is limited (so far) to a uniform dielectric Stay tuned…. Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
114
114 Na + Ca ++ Na + /Ca 2+ Competition in the Sodium Channel Biological Region Ca ++ in bath (M) Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
115
115 Model gives small-ion selectivity. Result also applies to the calcium channel. Na + /Alkali Metal Competition in Na + Channel Biological Region Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
116
116 ‘New’ result from PNP/SPM combined analysis Spatial Nonuniformity in Na + Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
117
117 Na + vs K + Selectivity Na + K + Channel Protein Na + Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
118
118 Na + Channels Select Small Na + over Big K + because (we predict) Protein side chains are small allowing Small Na + to Pack into Niches K + is too big for the niches! Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie Summary of Na + Channel
119
119 Sodium Channel Summary Na + channel is a Poorly Selective Highly Conducting Calcium channel, which is Roughened so it prefers Small Na + over big K + Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
120
120 Cl − Selective Channel Selective for Larger Anions The Dilute Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
121
121 Chloride Channel Channel prefers large anions in experiments, Low Density of Charge (several partial charges in 0.75 nm 3 ) Selectivity Filter contains hydrophobic groups these are modeled to (slightly) repel water this results in large-ion selectivity Conducts only anions at low concentrations Conducts both anions and cations at high concentration Current depends on anion type and concentration Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie Doug Henderson Dezso Boda
122
122 Biological Case Chloride Channel Selectivity depends Qualitatively on concentration Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
123
123 The Dilute Channel: Anion Selective Channel protein creates a Pressure difference between bath and channel Large ions like Cl – are Pushed into the channel more than smaller ions like F – Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
124
124 Key: Hydrophobic Residues Repel Water giving Large-ion selectivity (in both anion and cation channels). Peculiar non-monotonic conductance properties and IV curves observed in experiments Hydrophobic repulsion can give gating. ‘Vacuum lock’ model of gating (M. Green, D. Henderson; J.-P. Hansen; Mark Sansom; Sergei Sukarev) Chloride Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
125
125 Conclusion Each channel type is a variation on a theme of Crowded Charge and Electrostatics, Each channel types uses particular physics as a variation. Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
126
126 Function can be predicted From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws (sometimes, in some cases).
127
127 More? DFT
128
128 Density Functional and Poisson Nernst Planck model of Ion Selectivity in Biological Ion Channels Dirk Gillespie Wolfgang Nonner Department of Physiology and Biophysics University of Miami School of Medicine Bob Eisenberg Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology Rush Medical College, Chicago
129
129 We (following many others) have used Many Theories of Ionic Solutions as Highly Compressible Plasma of Ions with similar results MSA, SPM, MC and DFT MSA : M ean S pherical A pproximation SPM: S olvent P rimitive M odel MC: M ont e C arlo Simulation DFT: D ensity F unctiona l T heory of Solutions Most Accurate Atomic Detail Inhomogeneous Systems
130
130 Density Functional Theory HS excess chemical potential is from free energy functional Energy density depends on “non-local densities” Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
131
131 HS excess chemical potential is Free energy functional is due to Yasha Rosenfeld and is considered more than adequate by most physical chemists. The double convolution is hard to compute efficiently. Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg We have extended the functional to Charged Inhomogeneous Systems with a bootstrap perturbation method that fits MC simulations nearly perfectly.
132
132 Example of an Inhomogeneous Liquid A two-component hard- sphere fluid near a wall in equilibrium (a small and a large species). Near the wall there are excluded-volume effects that cause the particles to pack in layers. These effects are very nonlinear and are amplified in channels because of the high densities. small species large species
133
133 The Problem We are interested in computing the flux of ions between two baths of fixed ionic concentrations. Across the system an electrostatic potential is applied. Separating the two baths is a lipid membrane containing an ion channel. ionic concentrations and electrostatic potential held constant far from channel membrane with ion channel ionic concentrations and electrostatic potential held constant far from channel
134
134 Modeling Ion Flux The flux of ion species i is given by the constitutive relationship The flux follows the gradient of the total chemical potential. where D i is the diffusion coefficient i is the number density i is the total chemical potential of species i
135
135 } concentration-independent geometric restrictions solvation (Born) terms ideal term electrochemical potential of point particles in the electrostatic mean-field includes Poisson equation excess chemical potential the “rest”: the difference between the “real” solution and the ideal solution The chemical potential has three components
136
136 When ions are charged, hard spheres the excess chemical potential is split into two parts } } Electrostatic Component describes the electrostatic effects of charging up the ions Hard-Sphere Component describes the effects of excluded volume the centers of two hard spheres of radius R cannot come closer than 2R
137
137 Density Functional Theory HS excess chemical potential is derived from free energy functional Energy density depends on “non-local densities” Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
138
138 HS excess chemical potential is Free energy functional is due to Yasha Rosenfeld and is considered more than adequate by most physical chemists. The double convolution is hard to compute efficiently. Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg We have extended the functional to Charged Inhomogeneous Systems with a bootstrap perturbation method that fits MC simulations nearly perfectly.
139
139 Density Functional Theory Energy density depends on “non-local densities”: Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
140
140 Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg The non-local densities ( = 0, 1, 2, 3, V1, V2) are averages of the local densities: where is the Dirac delta function, is the Heaviside step function, and R i is the radius of species i.
141
141 We use Rosenfeld’s perturbation approach to compute the electrostatic component. Specifically, we assume that the local density i (x) is a perturbation of a reference density i ref (x): The ES Excess Chemical Potential Density Functional Theory
142
142 The Reference Fluid In previous implementations, the reference fluid was chosen to be a bulk fluid. This was both appropriate for the problem being solved and made computing its ES excess chemical potential straight-forward. However, for channels a bulk reference fluid is not sufficient. The channel interior can be highly-charged and so 20+ molar ion concentrations can result. That is, the ion concentrations inside the channel can be several orders of magnitude larger than the bath concentrations. For this reason we developed a formulation of the ES functional that could account for such large concentration differences.
143
143 Test of ES Functional To test our ES functional, we considered an equilibrium problem designed to mimic a calcium channel. two compartments were equilibrated edge effects fully computed 24 M O -1/2 CaCl 2 NaCl or KCl 0.1 M The dielectric constant was 78.4 throughout the system.
144
144
145
145
146
146 ‘New’ Mathematics is Needed: Analysis of Simulations
147
147 Can Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Direct Simulations are Problematic Even today
148
148 Can simulations serve as fundamental physical laws? Direct Simulations are Problematic Even today Simulations so far cannot reproduce macroscopic variables and phenomena known to dominate biology
149
149 Simulations so far often do not reproduce Concentration (i.e., number density) (or activity coefficient) Energy of Electric Field Ohm’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Fick’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Conservation Laws (e.g., of energy) Fluctuations in number density
150
150 The larger the calculation, the more work done, the greater the error First Principle of Numerical Integration First Principle of Experimentation The more work done, the less the error Simulations as fundamental physical laws (?)
151
151 How do we include Macroscopic Variables in Atomic Detail Calculations? Another viable approach is Hierarchy of Symplectic Simulations
152
152 Analysis of Simulations e.g., How do we include Macroscopic Variables Conservation laws in Atomic Detail Calculations? Because mathematical answer is unknown, I use an Engineering Approach Hierarchy of Low Resolution Models
153
153 Simulations produce too many numbers 10 6 trajectories each 10 -6 sec long, with 10 9 samples in each trajectory, in background of 10 22 atoms Why not simulate?
154
154 Simulations need a theory that Estimates Parameters (e.g., averages) or Ignores Variables Theories and Models are Unavoidable! (in my opinion)
155
155 Symplectic integrators are precise in ‘one’ variable at a time! It is not clear (at least to me) that symplectic integrators can be precise in all relevant variables at one time
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.