1. 1 Regular Expressions and Automata September 10 2009 Lecture #2-2

2. 2 Finite State Automata Regular Expressions (REs) can be viewed as a way to describe machines called Finite State Automata (FSA, also known as automata, finite automata). FSAs and their close variants are a theoretical foundation of much of the field of NLP.

3. 3 Finite State Automata FSAs recognize the regular languages represented by regular expressions –SheepTalk: /baa+!/ q0 q4 q1q2q3 ba a a! Directed graph with labeled nodes and arc transitions Five states: q0 the start state, q4 the final state, 5 transitions

4. 4 Formally FSA is a 5-tuple consisting of –Q: set of states {q0,q1,q2,q3,q4} –  : a finite alphabet of symbols {a,b,!} –q0: a start state –F: a set of accept/final states in Q {q4} –  (q,i): a transition function mapping Q x  to Q q0 q4 q1q2q3 ba a a!

5. 5 State Transition Table for SheepTalk SheepTalk State Input ba! 01ØØ 1Ø2Ø 2Ø3Ø 3Ø34 4ØØØ

6. 6 Recognition Recognition (or acceptance) is the process of determining whether or not a given input should be accepted by a given machine. Or… it’s the process of determining if as string is in the language we’re defining with the machine In terms of REs, it’s the process of determining whether or not a given input matches a particular regular expression. Traditionally, recognition is viewed as processing an input written on a tape consisting of cells containing elements from the alphabet.

7. 7 FSA recognizes (accepts) strings of a regular language –baa! –baaa! –… Tape metaphor: a rejected input b!aba q0q0

8. 8 Recognition Simply a process of starting in the start state Examining the current input Consulting the table Going to a new state and updating the tape pointer. Until you run out of tape.

9. 9 D-Recognize

10. 10 baaaa! q0q0 State Input ba! 01ØØ 1Ø2Ø 2Ø3Ø 3Ø34 4ØØØ q3q3 q3q3 q4q4 q1q1 q2q2 q3q3

11. 11 Key Points Deterministic means that at each point in processing there is always one unique thing to do (no choices). D-recognize is a simple table-driven interpreter The algorithm is universal for all unambiguous languages. –To change the machine, you change the table.

12. 12 Key Points Crudely therefore… matching strings with regular expressions (ala Perl) is a matter of –translating the expression into a machine (table) and –passing the table to an interpreter

13. 13 Recognition as Search You can view this algorithm as a degenerate kind of state-space search. States are pairings of tape positions and state numbers. Operators are compiled into the table Goal state is a pairing with the end of tape position and a final accept state Its degenerate because?

14. 14 Formal Languages Formal Languages are sets of strings composed of symbols from a finite set of symbols. Finite-state automate define formal languages (without having to enumerate all the strings in the language) Given a machine m (such as a particular FSA) L(m) means the formal language characterized by m. –L(Sheeptalk FSA) = {baa!, baaa!, baaaa!, …} (an infinite set)

15. 15 Generative Formalisms The term Generative is based on the view that you can run the machine as a generator to get strings from the language. FSAs can be viewed from two perspectives: –Acceptors that can tell you if a string is in the language –Generators to produce all and only the strings in the language

16. 16 Three Views Three equivalent formal ways to look at what we’re up to (not including tables – and we’ll find more…) Regular Expressions Regular Languages Finite State Automata

17. 17 Determinism Let’s take another look at what is going on with d- recognize. In particular, let’s look at what it means to be deterministic here and see if we can relax that notion. How would our recognition algorithm change? What would it mean for the accepted language?

18. 18 Determinism and Non-Determinism Deterministic: There is at most one transition that can be taken given a current state and input symbol. Non-deterministic: There is a choice of several transitions that can be taken given a current state and input symbol. (The machine doesn’t specify how to make the choice.)

19. 19 Non-Deterministic FSAs for SheepTalk SheepTalk q0 q4 q1q2q3 ba a a! q0 q4 q1q2q3 baa! 

20. 20 FSAs as Grammars for Natural Language q2q4q5q0q3q1q6 therev mr dr hon patl.robinson ms mrs  Can you use a regexpr to capture this too?

21. 21 Equivalence Non-deterministic machines can be converted to deterministic ones with a fairly simple construction (essentially building “set states” that are reached by following all possible states in parallel) That means that they have the same power; non- deterministic machines are not more powerful than deterministic ones It also means that one way to do recognition with a non- deterministic machine is to turn it into a deterministic one. Problems: translating gives us a not very intuitive machine, and this machine has LOTS of states

22. 22 Non-Deterministic Recognition In a ND FSA there exists at least one path directed through the machine by a string that is in the language defined by the machine that leads to an accept condition.. But not all paths directed through the machine by an accept string lead to an accept state. It is OK for some paths to lead to a reject condition. In a ND FSA no path directed through the machine by a string outside the language leads to an accept condition.

23. 23 Non-Deterministic Recognition So success in a non-deterministic recognition occurs when a path is found through the machine that ends in an accept. However, being driven to a reject condition by an input does not imply it should be rejected. Failure occurs only when none of the possible paths lead to an accept state. This means that the problem of non-deterministic recognition can be thought of as a standard search problem.

24. 24 The Problem of Choice Choice in non-deterministic models comes up again and again in NLP. Several Standard Solutions Backup (search, this chapter) –Save input/state of machine at choice points –If wrong choice, use this saved state to back up and try another choice Lookahead –Look ahead in the input to help make a choice Parallelism –Look at all choices in parallel

25. 25 Backup After a wrong choice leads to a dead-end (either no input left in a non-accept state, or no legal transitions), return to a previous choice point to pursue another unexplored choice. Thus, at each choice point, the search process needs to remember the (unexplored) choices. Standard State Space Search. State = (FSA node or machine state, tape-position)

26. 26 Example ba a a !\ q0q0 q1q1 q2q2 q2q2 q3q3 q4q4

27. 27 ND-Recognize Code

28. 28 Example Agenda:

29. 29 Example

30. 30 Example Agenda:

31. 31 Example

32. 32 Example Agenda:

33. 33 Example

34. 34 Example Agenda:

35. 35 Example Agenda:

36. 36 Example Agenda:

37. 37 Example

38. 38 Example Agenda:

39. 39 Example Agenda:

40. 40 Example Agenda:

41. 41 Example Agenda:

42. 42 Key Points States in the search space are pairings of tape positions and states in the machine. By keeping track of as yet unexplored states, a recognizer can systematically explore all the paths through the machine given an input.

43. 43 Infinite Search If you’re not careful such searches can go into an infinite loop. How?

44. 44 Why Bother? Non-determinism doesn’t get us more formal power and it causes headaches so why bother? –More natural solutions –Machines based on construction are too big

45. 45 Compositional Machines Formal languages are just sets of strings Therefore, we can talk about various set operations (intersection, union, concatenation) This turns out to be a useful exercise

46. 46 Union Accept a string in either of two languages

47. 47 Concatenation Accept a string consisting of a string from language L1 followed by a string from language L2.

48. 48 Negation Construct a machine M2 to accept all strings not accepted by machine M1 and reject all the strings accepted by M1 –Invert all the accept and not accept states in M1 Does that work for non-deterministic machines?

49. 49 Intersection Accept a string that is in both of two specified languages An indirect construction… –A^B = ~(~A or ~B)

50. 50 Why Bother? ‘FSAs can be useful tools for recognizing – and generating – subsets of natural language –But they cannot represent all NL phenomena (Center Embedding: The mouse the cat... chased died.)

51. 51 Summing Up Regular expressions and FSAs can represent subsets of natural language as well as regular languages –Both representations may be impossible for humans to understand for any real subset of a language –But they are very easy to use for smaller subsets Next time: Read Ch 3 For fun: –Think of ways you might characterize features of your email using only regular expressions