Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Michigan Birth Defects Registry Overview and Status
2
Some Key Facts Established by Act 236 of 1988 Requires Reporting by Hospitals and Cytogenetics Laboratories Passive Reporting Defined List of Reportable Conditions Reporting Began State Wide in 1992
3
Statement of Purpose Source of Statistical Data Surveillance of Birth Defects Trends Permit Research into Etiology Enable Referral to Needed Services
4
Reportable Conditions Congenital Anomalies –Excludes only minor conditions Other Conditions that Associate –Immune/Metabolic Deficiencies –Other Abnormalities Infectious Disease Exposures –Syphilis/Rubella/CMV/etc Maternal Exposures –Alcohol/Drugs/Toxic Agents
5
Current Status of the Registry Processed 393,616 reports Registry Contains 199,516 Cases Linked to Live Birth Registry Linked to Mortality Files Linked to Program Data – EHDI, CSHCS, Newborn Screening, Medicaid
6
Information Collected Case Specifics –Name and address –SSN, Medical Record Number –Mother’s Information Reportable Diagnostics Procedures Provided Live Birth Data Mortality Data
7
Data Collection Activities Process 32,000 reports annually 12,000 New Cases Annually Augment Case Reports –Pediatric Genetics Clinics –Early Hearing and Detection –Metabolic Screening Cases –Medicaid/Childrens Special Health Care Hospital Discharge Data
8
Status of Fetal Deaths Previously Prohibited Change in Law effective June 2003 –Act 562 of 2002 Implemented Certificate of Stillbirth –June 1, 2003 Stillbirth Birth Defects Reporting –January 1, 2004
9
Field Quality Assurance Activities in Michigan Monitoring Reporting Quality of the Birth Defects Registry
10
Data Quality Goals Completeness –95% or Greater Accuracy –98% or Greater Timeliness –data available within 24 months
11
Significant Issues Hospital and Lab Based Limited to under 2 Years No Interstate Exchange Live Births only until 2004 Passive Reporting
12
Findings of 2003 Data Quality Audit Completeness of 92% Diagnostic Reporting Accuracy of 97.8% False Positive Rate of 1.2%
13
Quality Improvement Activities Facility Monitoring –Reports Received/Expected Target Suspect Facilities Conduct Facility Audits –Case-finding –Re-abstracting Repeat Statewide Assessment –Evaluate 2005 reporting
14
Statistical Data Now Available www.michigan.gov/mdch 1992 through 2005 Birth Cohorts Numbers of Cases and Deaths Incidence and Mortality Rates Comparative Data on Live Births Information by Type of Condition County Level Data
17
Evaluation of Case Referrals Regional Review of Cases Review of Case Management –Medical Records Review Early On, CHSCH Referrals Source of Referral/Referral Practices Survey of Families –Utilization of Services –Perceived Need Survey of Physicians –Knowledge and Practice
18
Collaboration with EHDI Assist with Data on Screens Refer Cases of Hearing Loss Provide Statistical Assistance EHDI Confirmed Diagnosis Data to Improve Completeness and Accuracy
19
Cross Reference of Confirmed EDHI to MBDR Reports Live Births from 1997 - 2000
20
Folic Acid Education Program Basic Data on Neural Tube Defects Rapid Case Reporting -CDC Use of Case Reports for Family Contact Approved
21
Additional Collaborations Early ON, CSHCS, Medicaid Basic Statistical Data –Program Specific –Comparison Data Program Evaluation –Coverage/Penetration –Trends/Outcomes Outreach Registry Improvement
22
Early On Clients and Michigan Births by Mother’s Age Births during 1995 - 1997
23
Early On Clients and Michigan Births by Prenatal Care Trimester Births during 1995 - 1997
24
Early On Clients and Michigan Births by Birth Weight Births during 1995 - 1997
25
Registry Research Collaborations Birth Defects Among Infants Perinatally Exposed to HIV Mortality in Children with Birth Defects Evaluation of Potential Clusters Rate of Subsequent NTDs to Mothers with an NTD Child Analysis of Newborn Blood Spots for Selected Children with Birth Defects
26
Developed CSHCS Linked Study File 1998-2003 Determined MBDR/CSHCS Status Merged Birth/Death/MBDR Data Identified MBDR Cases – CSHCS Eligible Identified CSHCS Cases – MBDR Eligible
29
Differences Between CSHCS Eligible Children and MBDR Reportable Conditions Are Expected Fundamental Differences –Differences in Criteria for CSHCS and MBDR –Children Leaving CSHCS Data Comparability Issues/Problems –Late Reporting/ Timing Issues –Completeness –MBDR Primarily Hospital Based –MBDR Reportable to 2 Years
39
Considerations Geographic Variation Variation by Birth Facility Financial Need Pay Source from Birth File Diagnostics Severity
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.