1. MARK BECKMAN JON BROCK ERIK VAN KAMPEN TYLER WIERS TEAM 8 ATLAS|LIFT grip it ‘n flip it

2. Outline Team Project Overview Revised Scope Design Alternatives and Decisions Proposed Solution Future Challenges Questions

3. The Team JONBROCKJONBROCK TYLERWIERSTYLERWIERS ERIKVANKAMPENERIKVANKAMPEN MARKBECKMANMARKBECKMAN

4. Project Background Project Descriptions Vertellus Specialties Inc.  Makers of Mouthwash and Gum Favor Improve Employee Safety  Manual to Automatic Lifting of Barrels  Less Strenuous  More Efficient Design a Machine to Lift and Pour Fiber Drums  Pour Powdered Chemicals into Reactors

5. Revised Scope The Reactors 36” - 46” High 15” - 26” Deep 2 Buildings Financial Stewardship Increased focus on stewardship

6. Power System Power Options  Manual  Electric/gearbox  Pneumatic  Air over Oil  Hydraulics

7. Manual Pros: simple, inexpensive Cons: slow, strenuous to worker Pros: lift and compact, precise control Cons: explosion proof Electric/Gears

8. Pneumatic Pros: relatively inexpensive, high speed Cons: poor control, not enough power Pros: large lift capacity, explosion proof, fast Cons: relatively expensive, possibility of fluid leaks Hydraulic

9. Hydraulics Uses the simple principle of leverage

10. Hydraulic Components Power Options  Electric Motor  Air Motor  Reciprocating  Rotating Motion Options  Rotary Actuator  Linear Actuator

11. Proposed Solution Simple Tilting Frame Manual Height Adjustment Linear Hydraulic Cylinder Rotary Air Motor Over Center Valve Manual Control Valves

12. Future Challenges Hydraulic system analysis Chemical material properties  Flow Optimize Frame strength and weight  FEA Possible use of obsolete machinery Finalize PPFS

13. Questions?