1. Dieter Fox University of Washington Department of Computer Science & Engineering

2.  Joint work with  Students: Brian Ferris, Julie Letchner, Lin Liao, Don Patterson, Alvin Raj, Amarnag Subramanya, Danny Wyatt  UW faculty: Jeff Bilmes, Gaetano Borriello, Henry Kautz  Intel Research Seattle: Tanzeem Choudhury, Matthai Philipose  Funded by  NSF, DARPA, MSR, Toyota Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors2573 AU-08

3.  U.S. by 2050: 80 million people over age 65 and 13-16 million Alzheimer's patients  Goal: Develop technology to  Support independent living by people with cognitive disabilities ▪ At home ▪ At work ▪ Throughout community  Improve health care ▪ Long term monitoring of activities of daily living (ADL’s) ▪ Intervention before a health crisis 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors3

4. 4  Transportation routines via Dynamic Bayes Nets  Significant places via Conditional Random Fields  Activity recognition projects  Discussion 573 AU-08

5.  Given data stream from a wearable GPS unit  Infer the user’s location and mode of transportation (foot, car, bus, bike,...)  Predict where user will go  Detect novel behavior / user errors 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors5 [Liao-Fox-Kautz: AAAI-04, AIJ-07]

6.  Dead and semi-dead zones near buildings, trees, etc.  Sparse measurements inside vehicles, especially bus  Multi-path propagation  Inaccurate street map  … 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors6

7.  Map is directed graph  Location:  Edge e  Distance d from start of edge  Prediction:  Move along edges according to velocity model  Correction:  Update estimate based on GPS reading 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors7

8. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors8 GPS reading z k-1 zkzk Edge, velocity, position x k-1 xkxk Time k-1 Time k Task: Estimate posterior over hidden states

10. Problem: Predicted location is multi-modal 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors10 e 1 e 2 e 3 k-1 x e 0 ? ?

11. Problem: GPS reading is not on the graph 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors11 e 1 e 2 e 3 z k k x

12. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors12 e 1 e 2 e 3 z k k x  if =e 1 k x Problem: GPS reading is not on the graph

13. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors13 e 1 e 2 e 3 z k k x  if =e 2 k x Problem: GPS reading is not on the graph

14. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors14 GPS reading z k-1 zkzk Edge, velocity, position x k-1 xkxk Time k-1 Time k Task: Estimate posterior over all hidden states k-1 k GPS association e k-1 ekek Edge transition

15. STREET MAP Source: Tiger / Line data BUS ROUTES / STOPS Source: Metro GIS 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors15 RESTAURANTS / STORES Source: MS MapPoint

16.  Represents posterior by sets of weighted particles:  Basic idea: Sample some variables of state space and solve other variables analytically conditioned on samples  Here: Each particle contains Kalman filter for location:  Update sets by sampling procedure (SISR) 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors16 Edge transitions, velocities, edge associations KF for position

17. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors17 GPS measurements Particles (Kalman filters)

18. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors18 GPS reading z k-1 zkzk Edge, velocity, position x k-1 xkxk Time k-1 Time k m k-1 mkmk Transportation mode Particles:

19.  Encode prior knowledge into the model  Modes have different velocity distributions  Buses run on bus routes  Get on/off the bus near bus stops  Switch to car near car location 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors19

20. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors20 Measurements Projections Bus mode Car mode Foot mode Green Red Blue

21.  Goal (destination):  workplace (home, friends, restaurant,...)  Trip segments:  Home to Bus stop A on Foot  Bus stop A to Bus stop B on Bus  Bus stop B to workplace on Foot 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors21 BAWorkplace

22. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors22 GPS reading z k-1 zkzk Edge, velocity, position x k-1 xkxk Time k-1 Time k m k-1 mkmk Transportation mode t k-1 tktk Trip segment g k-1 gkgk Goal Particles: [Bui-Venkatesh-West: JAIR-02] [Liao-Fox-Kautz: AAAI-04, AIJ-07]

23.  Customized model for each user  Key to goal / path prediction and error detection  Use low level model to learn variable domains  Goals: locations where user stays for long time  Transition points: locations with high mode transition probability  Trip segments: connecting transition points or goals  Use full model to learn parameters  Transition probabilities (goals, trips, edges) via EM 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors23

24. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors24 Predicted goal Predicted path

25. GOING TO THE WORKPLACEGOING HOME 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors25 High probability transitions: bus car foot

26. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors26 0.5 43 0.5 5

27. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors27 GPS reading z k-1 zkzk Edge, velocity, position x k-1 xkxk Time k-1 Time k m k-1 mkmk Transportation mode t k-1 tktk Trip segment g k-1 gkgk Goal b k-1 bkbk Behavior mode normal / unknown / error [Patterson-Liao-etAl: Ubicomp-04]

28. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors28

29. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors29 Untrained flat model Trained model Instantiated model

30. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors30

31. Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors31  Transportation routines via Dynamic Bayes Nets  Significant places via Conditional Random Fields  Activity recognition projects  Discussion 573 AU-08

32.  So far  No distinction between different types of goals  Model not transferable to other person  Goals learned solely based on duration 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors32 [Liao-Fox-Kautz: NIPS-05,IJCAI-05,IJRR-07]

33. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors33 Store Home Bus stop Parking Friend Restaurant Work

34.  Undirected graphical model  Introduced for labeling sequence data [Lafferty-et al: ICML-01]  No independence assumption on observations!  Trained discriminatively from labeled data  Applied successfully to  Natural language processing [McCallum-Li: CoNLL-03], [Roth-Yih: ICML-05]  Computer vision [Kumar-Hebert: NIPS-04], [Quattoni-Collins-Darrel: NIPS-05]  Robotics [Limketkai-Liao-Fox: IJCAI-05], [Friedman-Pasula-Fox: IJCAI-07] Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors34573 AU-08

35.  Posterior factorizes into log-linear clique potentials  Local potentials link states to observations / features  Neighborhood potentials link states to neighboring states Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors35 Hidden states x Observations z 573 AU-08 Conditional Random Fields

36.  Posterior factorizes into log-linear clique potentials  Local potentials link states to observations / features  Neighborhood potentials link states to neighboring states Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors36 Hidden states x Observations z 573 AU-08 Conditional Random Fields

37.  Posterior factorizes into log-linear clique potentials  Local potentials link states to observations / features  Neighborhood potentials link states to neighboring states Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors37 Hidden states x Observations z 573 AU-08 Conditional Random Fields Partition function WeightsFeature functions

38.  Conditional distribution parameterized via weights w:  Maximize conditional log-likelihood with shrinkage prior:  Maximization via stochastic / conjugate gradient, L-BFGS  Alternative: maximize pseudo log-likelihood Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors38573 AU-08 [Besag: 1975]

39.  BP computes posteriors via local message passing  Sum-product for posterior  Max-product for MAP  Exact if network has no loops  Otherwise, run loopy belief propagation and hope it works  Alternatives: ICM, graph-cut, MCMC, … Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors39573 AU-08....

40.  Temporal pattern: duration, time of day, etc.  Geographic evidence: is there a restaurant / store / bus stop nearby?  Transition relation: adjacent activities  Spatial feature: relation between place and activity  Summation constraint: number of places labeled home or workplace 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors40

41. GPS trace 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors41 … … Activity sequence walk, drive, ride bus, work, visit, sleep, pickup, get on/off bus a1a1 a2a2 a3a3 a4a4 a5a5 a N-2 a N-1 aNaN [Liao-Fox-Kautz: NIPS-05]

42. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors42 … GPS trace  Two weeks data (> 50,000 gps points)  Inference: loopy BP (10 minutes); Learning: Pseudo-likelihood (3 minutes) … Activity sequence walk, drive, ride bus, work, visit, sleep, pickup, get on/off bus a1a1 a2a2 a3a3 a4a4 a5a5 a N-2 a N-1 aNaN … Significant places home, work, bus stop, parking lot, friend’s home p1p1 p2p2 p3p3 pKpK Global, soft constraints # homes, workplaces wh [Liao-Fox-Kautz: NIPS-05]

43.  Generalize from people with labeled data to others without labeled data  Relational Markov Networks to specify CRFs and parameter sharing via templates 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors43 Training data User1 User2 User3 Generic model Other users Supervised learning Shared parameters [Taskar-Abbeel-Koller: UAI-02]

44. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors44

45. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors45

46. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors46

47. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors47 Cross-validation using data from 4 persons

48. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors48

49. Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors49  Transportation routines via Dynamic Bayes Nets  Significant places via Conditional Random Fields  Activity recognition projects  Discussion 573 AU-08

50. Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors50 [Ferris-Haehnel-Fox: RSS-06]

51.  GP regression  nonparametric  smooth interpolation  uncertainty estimates 573 AU-08 Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors 51 Mean Variance

52. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors52

53. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors53 Battery Camera (on ribbon cable) GPS receiver iMote2 + two sensor boards MicrophoneCamera Light sensors 2 GB SD card Indicator LEDs  Records 4 hours of audio, images (1/sec), GPS, and sensor data (accelerometer, barometric pressure, light intensity, gyroscope, magnetometer)

54. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors54 Courtesy of G. Borriello

55. 55573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors [Subramanya-Raj-Bilmes-Fox: UAI-06, ISRR-06]  Boosted cassifiers [Lester-Choudhury-etAl: IJCAI-05]  Virtual evidence boosting [Liao-Choudhury-Fox-Kautz: IJCAI-07] Accuracy: 88% activities, 93% environment

56. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors56 GPS traces Image sequence (currently in car) Timeline of soldier activities

57. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors57 [Patterson-Fox-Kautz-Philipose: ISWC-05] [Philipose-Fishkin-etAl: Pervasive-04]

58. 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors58

59. 59573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors

60.  Performs object aggregation and smoothing over object types Accuracy: 88% SED: 6.4 60573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors

61. 61  Transportation routines via Dynamic Bayes Nets  Significant places via Conditional Random Fields  Activity recognition projects  Discussion 573 AU-08

62.  Graph-based representation well suited to compactly represent and learn motion patterns  Hierarchical graphical models (DBN, CRF) powerful tools for bridging gap between continuous sensor data and abstract states  Conditional Random Fields can handle high- dimensional / dependent feature vectors  Sensor-based activity recognition is an exciting research area with potentially huge impact! 573 AU-08Dieter Fox: Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors62