1. Cross Collection Discovery in the Yale Digital Commons Youn Noh November 19, 2010

2. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

3. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

4. Digital Collections at Yale

5.  Yale faculty and students access Yale’s extensive collections for teaching and research.  Some Yale faculty would also like to archive their personal collections.  Yale’s Information Technology Services supports web site development for particular classes. Web sites are typically developed as one offs.  Yale’s Office of Digital Dissemination, in the Office of the Secretary, promotes the internationalization of Yale and the dissemination of Yale’s collections to the world.

6. The Problem of Silos

7.  Thematically related content is separated.  User interfaces have to be built for each collection.  Users may not know where to look.  The information architecture for Yale’s search environment is still largely based on organizational structure.  There is no easy way to drill down to content based on interests or information need.  Resources may not be organized or described in a consistent manner across collections.

8. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

9. Cross Collection Search (2007)  Mellon-funded Collections Collaborative re-grant project to enhance discovery, search, and access to Yale’s special collections.  Partnership led by Yale University Library and Yale’s Information Technology Services.  Proof-of-concept metadata aggregation using OAI-PMH.  Challenges and lessons learned  Reusable infrastructure requires upfront investment.  Payoffs are not immediate.  Sustainability is always an issue.

10. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

11. Single Search for Library, Archive and Museum Collections  Project sponsored by OCLC to create guidelines for the implementation of single search for local aggregations of LAM collections.  Working Group  Getty Research Institute  Minnesota Historical Society  Smithsonian Institution  Wellcome Trust  UC Berkeley  University of Calgary  Victoria and Albert Museum  Yale Center for British Art  Yale University  Final deliverable will be a white paper based on an internal survey that addresses issues identified by the Working Group.

12. ARTstor Shared Shelf  Project to develop a cataloging and image management system that integrates with the ARTstor Digital Library.  Target audience  Library visual resources collections  Instructional technology (and faculty)  Fills a gap.  No single image cataloging system has market dominance.  Leverages strengths.  The ARTstor Digital Library has a broad user base.  Cataloging interface is being developed iteratively based on requirements gathering and user testing at partner institutions.  Business model is being developed in consultation with the Shared Shelf Steering Committee, which includes Cornell and Yale.

13. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

14. Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Provides strategic and operational leadership for the development of Yale’s digital assets and infrastructure.  Leads and coordinates collaboration among campus units.  Galleries, libraries, archives, and museums  Office of Digital Dissemination  Office of Public Affairs and Communications  Yale University Press  Identifies overlaps and gaps in infrastructure for teaching and research.  Arts Area Advisory Committee  Collections and Educational Technology  Provost’s Committee on Scholarly Publishing  Mass Storage Working Group

15. Yale Digital Commons  Provides a collaborative framework for developing services to support Yale’s digital assets throughout their lifecycle.  Supports digital production, collaboration, dissemination, and stewardship functions.  Improves sustainability of programs through larger-scale adoptions.  Services  Digital asset management  Digital preservation  Persistent linking  Cross collection discovery

16. Isilon Mass Storage C1C2 Messaging Yale Digital Commons Components DAM Digital Preservation Metadata iTunes U Cross Collection Discovery Collection Management Systems - Orbis - TMS - eMU DataWarehouse/Reporting You Tube Web CDN Drupal OAI Search Persistent Linking ContentExport MMMMMM Aggregate MMMM MMMMMMMM Metadata MM Kaltura

17. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

18. Cross Collection Discovery Goals and Deliverables  Goals  Develop shared practices and infrastructure.  Provide broader access to Yale’s collections.  Deliverables  Metadata aggregation service (built on OAICat)  Central OAI service provider harvests metadata from campus partners.  File transfer option for partners that do not implement providers.  Central OAI data provider provides aggregated metadata to external harvesters.  User interface and search service (built on VuFind)  Customized record displays based on metadata format.  Crosswalk for indexing, advanced search, and facets.  Normalized local controlled vocabularies for key fields.  Programmatic access provided via APIs.

19. Cross Collection Discovery Campus Partners and Collections  Yale Center for British Art  Paintings and Sculpture  Prints and Drawings  Rare Books and Manuscripts  Yale Peabody Museum  All departments  Yale University Art Gallery  All departments  Yale University Library  Map Collection  Lewis Walpole Library Prints and Drawings  Office of Digital Dissemination  Yale University on iTunes U

20. Cross Collection Discovery Architecture

21. Cross Collection Discovery Metadata  Crosswalks and mappings  Local database schemas  eMU  TMS  Yale NetCast tool  Standard metadata formats  CDWA-Lite  Darwin Core  Dublin Core  MARC  VuFind / Solr index fields  Based roughly on MARC.  New fields added as needed.  XSL used for transformations.

22. Cross Collection Discovery Metadata  Facets and local controlled vocabularies  Access  Metadata must be in the public domain.  Assets may be restricted.  Important distinction to make in user interface for non-Yale users.  Local controlled vocabulary of integer values (0 for public domain and 1 for restricted access) used to designate type of access.  Providers host assets and handle user authentication.  Institution  Important for campus partners.  Collection  Corresponds to museum departments, library collections, and categories in iTunes U.  Provided as OAI sets.  Means of bringing together similar resources held by different units.

23. Cross Collection Discovery Metadata  Facets and controlled vocabularies  Creator (1XX)  For specimens? Scientific name author.  Type (LDR/06)  Museums use normalized local controlled vocabulary for classification developed for digital asset management system object models.  Topic (6XX)  Topical or iconographic description is important for access.  Museums are exploring social tagging to broaden access.  Genre (655)  Region (651, 650z, 690z)  Museums use culture.  Era (648, 650y, 690y)  For specimens? Periods, epochs, ages, groups, and formations.

24. Cross Collection Discovery Demo  Search  Item record display  Resource dissemination  Refine search

25. Outline  Introduction  Project background  Related work  Project context  Office of Digital Assets and Infrastructure  Yale Digital Commons  Current phase  Goals and deliverables  Campus partners and collections  Architecture and metadata  Demo  Future work

26. Cross Collection Discovery Future Work  Usability  Stakeholder survey  User testing  Search analytics  Controlled vocabulary services  Use ARTstor vocabulary services.  Search optimization  Tweak Lucene / Solr to boost fields and records in search.  Topic modeling  Apply probabilistic text mining technique for learning topics across collections.