1. J. Mehilli, MD, G. Richard, F-J. Neumann, S. Massberg, K-L. Laugwitz, J. Pache, J. Hausleiter, I. Ott, M. Fusaro, T. Ibrahim, A. Schömig, A. Kastrati Deutsches Herzzentrum & 1st Med. Klinik rechts der Isar, Technische Universität Munich, Germany ISAR-CABG: Randomized, Superiority Trial of Drug-Eluting-Stent and Bare Metal Stent in Safenous Vein Graft Lesions

2. Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Lecture fees from Abbott Vascular

3. Background Years After Randomization Patients at Risk SES BMS 2486 2472 1891 1639 1099 902 921 773 682 621 491 395 0 10 20 30 40 50 Sirolimus-eluting stent 012345 Bare metal stent Probability of Death, MI and Reintervention, % HR 0.43 (0.34, 0.54) 14 Trials, 4958 pts DES are more effective and as safe as their BMS predecessors in native coronary artery lesions Kastrati …Schömig, NEJM 2007 HR 0.46 (0.38, 0.55) 5 Trials, 3513 pts Stone …Leon, NEJM 2007

4. DES vs. BMS in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions Vermeersch et al., JACC 2007 DELAYED RRISC Trial N=75 months % TLR P=.55 Survival SES BMS

5. All-cause DeathTarget Lesion Revascularization Cardiac death 7% (PES) vs. 13% (BMS) HR 0.62 [0.15-2-6]; P=0.51 DES vs. BMS in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions Brilakis et al., JACC Intv 2011 SOS Trial N=80

6. Objective of the of ISAR-CABG Trial: …to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting stents against bare metal stents – in a trial powered for clinical events Participating Centers Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich 1.Med. Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen Bad Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg Germany

7. Inclusion criteria Patients with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥50 % de novo stenosis located in saphenous vein grafts Informed, written consent Exclusion criteria Cardiogenic shock Target lesion located in arterial grafts Malignancies with life expectancy <1 year Allergies to study medication Patient Selection

8. Composite of death, myocardial infarction ischemia-related target lesion revascularization at 1-year post index PCI Primary Endpoint

9. Secondary Endpoints All cause mortality Myocardial infarction Ischemia-related target lesion revascularization Incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis at 1-year post index PCI

10. Sample Size Calculation Hypothesis: Drug-eluting stent (DES) is superior to bare metal stent (BMS) in terms of major adverse cardiac events Assumptions: Incidence of primary endpoint in BMS group of 30% Reduction of MACE with DES of 33% Power of 80%  -level of 0.05 Total number of patients needed: 600 (accounting for possible losses at follow-up)

11. DES (Cypher/Taxus/BP Sirolimus) n=303 BMS n=307 610 patients with de novo SVG lesions Is Drug-Eluting Stenting Associated With Improved Results in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts? ISAR-CABG 6 to 8-month repeat angiogram (encouraged) 12-month clinical follow-up

12. serial CK + CKMB measurements 600 mg Clopidogrel PCI ASS 500 mg 0 repeat angiography clinical follow-up 6-8 mo. 12 mo. Follow-Up Protocol 30 d clinical follow-up Clopidogrel2x75 mg/day until discharge 75 mg at least 6 months after index PCI Aspirin200 mg/d indefinitely

13. DES n=303 BMS n=307 Age, years71.4± 9.0 71.5± 9.3 Female, %1316 Art. hypertension, %7173 Diabetes, %3735 Current smoker, %86 Hyperlipidemia, %8886 SVG age, years13.8± 5.5 13.5± 5.1 History of MI, %5655 Baseline clinical characteristics

14. DES n=303 BMS n=307 Clinical presentation, % acute MI1713 unstable angina2127 stable angina6260 Multivessel disease, %9899 Multilesion PCI, %2422 >1 SVGs treated/patient, %4.03.6 LV ejection fraction, %49.2± 12.2 49.5± 13.8 Baseline clinical characteristics, II

15. Angiographic characteristics DES n=386 BMS n=385 Recipient vessel, % LAD/diagonal32.031.0 LCx/marginal35.036.0 RCA/PDA33.0 Vessel size, mm3.36± 0.67 3.38± 0.73 Total stented length, mm26.8± 15.4 27.5± 17.7

16. DES % >75%50%-75%25%-50% Distribution of SVG Degeneration Score < 25% BMS %

17. DES % medialproximalcoronary Distribution of Lesion Location within the SVGs aortal BMS % distaldiffuse

18. 100 60 20 % 100 60 20 % Distribution of TIMI Flow Rates DESBMSDESBMS Prior to PCI After PCI TIMI 3TIMI 2TIMI 1TIMI 0

19. 30-Day Clinical Outcomes % BMS DES P=.57P=.66P=.07P=.05 Cardiac deathMyocardial infarction * No TLR occurred and only 1 pt (DES) died suddenly (probable stent thrombosis) during 30-day follow-up MACE*All-cause death

20. Months After Randomization Cumulative Incidence (%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0123456789101112 Primary Endpoint: Death/MI/TLR 22.1% 15.4% P=.03 RR 0.65 [0.45-0.96] BMS DES

21. All-cause Death Months After Randomization 0 10 20 30 40 50 0123456789101112 Cumulative Incidence (%) 4.7% 5.2% P=.82 RR 1.09 [0.52-2.25] BMS DES

22. Months After Randomization 0 10 20 30 40 50 0123456789101112 Cumulative Incidence (%) Myocardial Infarction 6.0% 4.2% P=.27 RR 0.66 [0.32-1.37] BMS DES

23. Death or Myocardial Infarction Cumulative Incidence (%) P=.27 RR 0.75 [0.45-1.26] BMS DES Months After Randomization 0 10 20 30 40 50 0123456789101112 10.9% 8.5%

24. Definite/Probable Stent Thrombosis Months After Randomization 0123456789101112 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cumulative Incidence (%) P=.99 RR 1.01 [0.14-7.18] BMS DES 0.7%

25. Target Lesion Revascularization 0 10 20 30 40 50 0123456789101112 Cumulative Incidence (%) P=.02 RR 0.52 [0.30-0.90] BMS DES 13.1% 7.2% Months After Randomization

26. Target Vessel Revascularization % BMSDES TLR % TVR P=.02 RR 0.52 [0.30-0.90] P=.03 RR 0.61 [0.39-0.95]

27. Summary Out to 12 months drug-eluting stents are superior to bare metal stents in a large-scale study powered for clinical endpoints. The need for repeat revascularizations was reduced by ~50% with DES as compared to BMS. DES were comparable to BMS regarding safety parameters – stent thrombosis, death or MI.