Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmil Allison Modified over 9 years ago
1
Last Week… We looked at environmental influences on managing:
internally, it’s the organizational culture externally, it’s about indirect and direct influences, including the role of uncertainty and various stakeholders We examined the complexity of the interdependencies between a business and their stakeholders. We also examined influences on management resulting from the “interconnectedness” of our world – the impact of “globalization”
2
This Week’s Objectives
Understand corporate social responsibility and it’s impact on management Look at the role of values in management Understand ethics and the movement to address ethics in management
3
Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Ethics
Chapter 4 Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Ethics Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
4
When managing, who do you answer to? and… Who is watching?
The Questions… When managing, who do you answer to? and… Who is watching?
5
What Is Corporate Social Responsibility?
The Classical View Maximize profits for the benefit of the stockholders Doing “social good” unjustifiably increases costs Learning Objective #1 Managers regularly face decisions that have a dimension of social responsibility. We define social responsibility as a business’s obligation, beyond that required by law and economics, to pursue long-term goals that are good for society. This definition assumes that a business obeys laws and pursues economic interests. But also note that this definition views business as a moral agent. That is, in its effort to do good for society, it must differentiate between right and wrong. The more obvious examples include: employee relations, philanthropy, pricing, resource conservation, product quality, and doing business in countries that violate human rights. There are two opposing views of what social responsibility is. 1. The classical view is the view that management’s only social responsibility is to maximize profits. a. Milton Friedman is the most outspoken advocate of this view. b. He argues that managers’ primary responsibility is to operate the business in the best interests of the stockholders—the true owners of the organization. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
6
What Is Corporate Social Responsibility?
The Socio-economic View Management should also protect and improve society’s welfare Corporations are responsible not only to stockholders Firms have a moral responsibility to larger society “to do the right thing” 2. The socio-economic view is the view that management’s social responsibility goes beyond the making of profits to include protecting and improving society’s welfare. a. The argument behind this view is that corporations are not independent entities responsible only to stockholders. b. Also, modern organizations are no longer just economic institutions. Society expects businesses to become involved in social, political, and legal issues. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
7
Arguments For Social Responsibility
Public expectations Long-run profits Ethical obligation Public image Better environment Discouragement of further governmental regulation Balance of responsibility and power Stockholder interests Possession of resources Superiority of prevention over cure How do socially responsible activities affect a company’s economic performance? A. The majority of studies found a positive relationship between social involvement and economic performance, but some caution is necessary because of methodological questions associated with trying to measure social responsibility and economic performance. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
8
Arguments Against Social Responsibility
Violation of profit maximization Dilution of purpose Costs Too much power Lack of skills Lack of accountability How do socially responsible activities affect a company’s economic performance? A. The majority of studies found a positive relationship between social involvement and economic performance, but some caution is necessary because of methodological questions associated with trying to measure social responsibility and economic performance. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
9
The Range of Social Conscience
Social Obligation You act to positively impact society because of obligations to meet certain economic and legal responsibilities Social Responsiveness You act to positively impact society in response to a popular social need. (Pragmatic, responsive, medium/short term). Corporate Social Responsibility You act to positively impact society because of held values about right and wrong, and organization’s social role. (Ethical, ends-focused, long term). Values-based management is an approach to managing in which managers establish, promote, and practise an organization’s shared values. A. Purposes of Shared Values (see Exhibit 4.3) 1. They act as guideposts for managerial decisions and actions. 2. They also serve to shape employee behaviour and to communicate what the organization expects of its members. 3. The shared corporate values also can influence the organization’s marketing efforts. 4. Finally, shared values are a way to build team spirit in organizations. B. The Bottom Line on Shared Corporate Values 1. A 2002 survey on corporate values by the AMA showed that managers at a number of organizations have made a commitment to a set of core values (see Exhibit 4.4 for the survey results). 2. Only 64% said that their corporate values were linked to performance evaluations and compensation. 3. An organization’s values are revealed in the decisions and actions of employees. 4-9 9
10
Examples of Social Responsibility
Tom’s of Maine: Herman Miller: Timberland: Meritas Mutual Funds: Business Ethics Magazine: Values-based management is an approach to managing in which managers establish, promote, and practise an organization’s shared values. A. Purposes of Shared Values (see Exhibit 4.3) 1. They act as guideposts for managerial decisions and actions. 2. They also serve to shape employee behaviour and to communicate what the organization expects of its members. 3. The shared corporate values also can influence the organization’s marketing efforts. 4. Finally, shared values are a way to build team spirit in organizations. B. The Bottom Line on Shared Corporate Values 1. A 2002 survey on corporate values by the AMA showed that managers at a number of organizations have made a commitment to a set of core values (see Exhibit 4.4 for the survey results). 2. Only 64% said that their corporate values were linked to performance evaluations and compensation. 3. An organization’s values are revealed in the decisions and actions of employees. 4-10 10
11
Values-Based Management
Managers establish and uphold an organization’s shared values Purposes of Shared Values Guiding managerial decisions Shaping employee behaviour Influencing the direction of marketing efforts Building team spirit The Bottom Line on Shared Corporate Values An organization’s values (or lack of) are reflected in the decisions and actions of its employees Values-based management is an approach to managing in which managers establish, promote, and practise an organization’s shared values. A. Purposes of Shared Values (see Exhibit 4.3) 1. They act as guideposts for managerial decisions and actions. 2. They also serve to shape employee behaviour and to communicate what the organization expects of its members. 3. The shared corporate values also can influence the organization’s marketing efforts. 4. Finally, shared values are a way to build team spirit in organizations. B. The Bottom Line on Shared Corporate Values 1. A 2002 survey on corporate values by the AMA showed that managers at a number of organizations have made a commitment to a set of core values (see Exhibit 4.4 for the survey results). 2. Only 64% said that their corporate values were linked to performance evaluations and compensation. 3. An organization’s values are revealed in the decisions and actions of employees. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
12
Managerial Ethics Ethics Defined: The rules and principles that define right and wrong conduct There are 4 views of ethics… Learning Objective #5 Recent corporate scandals including Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, and ImClone may cause many to conclude that corporate America has no ethics. The term ethics refers to rules and principles that define right and wrong conduct. Four Views of Ethics 1. Utilitarian view of ethics says that ethical decisions are made solely on the basis of their outcomes or consequences. 2. Rights view of ethics is concerned with respecting and protecting individual liberties and privileges such as the rights to privacy, free speech, and due process. 3. Theory of justice view of ethics is where managers impose and enforce rules fairly and impartially and do so by following all legal rules and regulations. 4. Integrative social contracts theory proposes that ethical decisions be based on existing ethical norms in industries and communities in determining what constitutes right and wrong.
13
Utilitarian View Greatest good is provided for the greatest number
Encourages efficiency and productivity and is consistent with the goal of profit maximization
14
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
Rights View Respecting and protecting individual liberties and privileges Seeks to protect individual rights of conscience, free speech, life and safety, and due process Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
15
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
The Theory of Justice Organizational rules are enforced fairly and impartially and follow all legal rules and regulations Protects the interests of underrepresented stakeholders and the rights of employees Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
16
Integrative Social Contracts Theory
Ethical decisions should be based on existing ethical norms in industries and communities Based on integration of the general social contract and the specific contract between community members Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
17
Exhibit 4.6 Factors That Affect Ethical and Unethical Behaviour
Individual Issue Characteristics Intensity Ethical Stage of Moral Ethical/Unethical Moderators Dilemma Development Behaviour Exhibit 4.6 shows the complex interactions that influence whether a person acts ethically or unethically when faced with an ethical dilemma. Structural Organizational Variables Culture Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
18
Factors That Affect Employee Ethics
Stages of moral development Individual characteristics Structural variables Organizational culture Issue intensity 1. Stages of Moral Development. Research confirms three levels of moral development (see Exhibit 4.6). Each level has two stages. First level is preconventional. Person’s choice based on personal consequences involved. b. Conventional level indicates that moral values reside in maintaining expected standards. c. Principled level has individuals make a clear effort to define moral principles apart for the authority of the groups to which individuals belong. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
19
Levels of Moral Development
Pre-conventional level (self-centred) Conventional level (peer driven) Principled level (value driven) (Within each level are two stages) Stages of Moral Development. Research confirms three levels of moral development (see Exhibit 4.7). Each level has two stages. a. First level is preconventional. Person’s choice based on personal consequences involved. b. Conventional level indicates that moral values reside in maintaining expected standards. c. Principled level has individuals make a clear effort to define moral principles apart from the authority of the groups to which individuals belong.
20
Research Conclusions on Moral Development
People proceed through the stages of moral development sequentially There is no guarantee of continued moral development Most adults are in Stage 4 (“good corporate citizen”) Whether a person acts ethically or unethically when faced with an ethical dilemma is the result of complex interactions between the stage of moral development and several moderating variables, including individual characteristics, the organization’s structural design, the organization’s culture, and the intensity of the ethical issue. (See Exhibit 4.5.) Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
21
Individual characteristics
Values Basic convictions about what is right or wrong on a broad range of issues Ego strength A personality measure of the strength of a person’s convictions Locus of Control A personality attribute that measures the degree to which people believe they control their own life Internal locus: the belief that you control your destiny External locus: the belief that what happens to you is due to luck or chance 2. The second factor that influences managerial ethics is individual characteristics. a. Our values are our basic convictions about what is right and wrong. b. Ego strength is a personality measure of the strength of a person’s convictions. Individuals high in ego strength are likely to resist impulses to act unethically and instead do what they think is right.
22
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
Structural Variables Organizational characteristics and mechanisms that guide and influence individual ethics: Performance appraisal systems Reward allocation systems Behaviours (ethical) of managers 3. The third factor that influences managerial ethics is structural variables. The existence of formal rules and regulations, job descriptions, written codes of ethics, performance appraisal systems, and reward systems can strongly influence ethical behaviour. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
23
Exhibit 4.8 Determinants of Issue Intensity
How much agreement is there that this action is wrong? How likely is it How many people that this action will be harmed? will cause harm? Consensus of Wrong Greatness Probability of Harm of Harm Issue Intensity Concentration Immediacy of 5. Finally, the intensity of an issue can affect ethical decisions. There are six characteristics that determine issue intensity (see Exhibit 4.8). a. Greatness of harm b. Consensus of wrong c. Probability of harm d. Immediacy of consequences e. Proximity to victim f. Concentration of effect According to these guidelines, the larger the number of people harmed, the more agreement that the action is wrong, the greater the likelihood that the action will cause harm, the more immediately that the consequences of the action will be felt, the closer the person feels to the victim(s), and the more concentrated the effect of the action on the victim(s), the greater the issue intensity. The more intense an issue is, the more we should expect employees to behave ethically. of Effect Consequences Proximity to How concentrated Victim(s) Will harm be felt is the effect of the immediately? action on the victim(s)? How close are the potential victims? Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
24
Ethics in an International Context
Ethical standards are not universal Social and cultural differences determine acceptable behaviours Are ethical standards universal? Hardly! Social and cultural differences between countries are important environmental factors that determine ethical and unethical behaviour. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
25
The Global Compact Initiated through the United Nations in 1999
Covers principles regarding Human Rights, Labour Standards, Environment and Anti-Corruption Asks participants to incorporate these principles in their business activities Over 3000 companies and organizations across the globe participate in this compact. At the World Economic Forum in 1999, the United Nations secretary general challenged world business leaders to “embrace and enact” the Global Compact. Global organizations have been asked to incorporate these guidelines into their business activities. The goal: a more sustainable and inclusive global economy. Today, hundreds of companies and international labour organizations from all regions of the world are engaged in the Global Compact.
26
How Managers Can Improve Ethical Behaviour in an Organization
Hire individuals with high ethical standards. Establish codes of ethics and decision rules. Lead by example. Delineate job goals and performance appraisal mechanisms. Provide ethics training. Conduct independent social audits. Provide support for individuals facing ethical dilemmas. 1. The selection process for bringing new employees into organizations should be viewed as an opportunity to learn about an individual’s level of moral development, personal values, ego strength, and locus of control. 2. A code of ethics is a formal statement of an organization’s primary values and the ethical rules it expects employees to follow. Ethical leadership is also an important element in fostering ethical behaviour. Top management’s leadership and commitment to ethical behaviour is extremely important because it’s the top managers who set the cultural tone. 4. Employees’ job goals should be tangible and realistic, because when goals are clear and realistic, they reduce ambiguity and motivate rather than punish. Job goals are usually a key issue in performance appraisal. If an organization wants its employees to uphold high ethical standards, it must include this dimension in its appraisal process. Performance appraisals should be comprehensive and not just focus on economic outcomes. 5. Ethics training should be used to help teach ethical problem solving and to present simulations of ethical situations that might arise. If it does nothing else, ethics training should increase awareness of ethical issues 6. Independent social audits evaluate decisions and management practices in terms of the organization’s code of ethics and can be used to deter unethical behaviour. 7. Finally, organizations can provide formal protective mechanisms so that employees with ethical dilemmas can do something about them without fear of reprisal. “Whistle-blowers” can be a key part of a company’s ethics program because they are willing to step forward and expose unethical behaviour, no matter what the cost professionally or personally. The company must limit these potential negative effects. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
27
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
Code of Ethics A formal statement of an organization’s primary values and the ethical rules it expects its employees to follow Be a dependable organizational citizen Don’t do anything unlawful or improper that will harm the organization Be good to customers A code of ethics is a formal statement of an organization’s primary values and the ethical rules it expects employees to follow. Also, decision rules can be developed to guide managers in handling ethical dilemmas in decision-making. A survey of companies’ codes of ethics found their content tended to fall into three categories: 1. Be a dependable organizational citizen; 2. Don’t do anything unlawful or improper that will harm the organization; and 3. Be good to customers. Source: F.R. David, “An Empirical Study of Codes of Business Ethics: A Strategic Perspective.” Paper presented at the 48th Annual Academy of Management Conference, Anaheim, California, August 1988. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
28
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
Exhibit 4.9 provides the 12 questions developed by Laura Nash that can be used to examine the ethics of a business decision. Chapter 4, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada
29
This Week’s Summary Examined Social Responsibility: what is it, what are the range of approaches, the role of values management. We also looked at perspectives on ethics, the factors that influence ethical behaviour, and international and practical trends for ethics in managing.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.