1. Alex Norta, PhD., Department of Informatics, TTÜ@IEEE CoinBase'15, Tallinn, Estonia Designing Smart Contracts for Automating Cross- Organizational CollaborationSmart Contracts For Blockchain-Tech

2. Agenda Introduction Current state in blockchain-tech/crypto-currency – Gap and research question Business-collaboration model – Master/client- vs. P2P-collaboration – Detailed collaboration model Suitability exploration – eContract-based exploration – Pattern-based exploration Expressiveness exploration eSourcing Markup Language (eSML) eSML application Conclusion and future work

3. Introduction Many smart-contracting solutions emerge: – Digital anarchy is coming Digital anarchy – UltraCoins to eliminate mainstream financial system UltraCoins – ProofOfExistence with legal importance ProofOfExistence – Blockchain ID Blockchain ID – Blockchain changes business Blockchain changes business – Blockchain changes contract lawcontract law – Bithalo as lighweight smart contracting option Bithalo whitepaper – Ethereum as a heavy-weight smart cotracting choice Ethereum whitepaper Vitali Buterin won a price for thatwon a price – Escrows are the business-model of the future Escrows Smart Contracting HUBs in Clouds Smart Contracting HUBs BitNation as a Governance 2.0 alternative to dinosaur stateist government. BitNation as a Governance 2.0

4. Introduction New enabling concepts and technologies – service-oriented cloud computing (SOCC) – Business Process as a Service (BPaaS) – Cross-organizational eSourcing framework – Big data, mobile devices

5. Introduction BPaaS Contracting- HUB

6. Introduction Gap: Existing SOCC languages do not take into account sociotechnical suitability and expressiveness. – Lack of interaction-recognition between acting humans in organizations with technology in workplaces – Suitability: concepts/properties to formulate real-world business-collaborations – Expressiveness: semantic language-construct clarity for uniform enactment Research question: How to systematically develop a language for cross-sociotechnical and contract-based system collaboration specifications? – What is the collaboration context and model the specification language must cater for? – What are the main suitability- and expressiveness concepts and -properties?

7. Business-Collaboration Model

8. P2P-Collaboration Model

9. Suitability Exploration eContract-based collaboration – Who-concept

10. Suitability Exploration eContract-based collaboration – Where-concept

11. Suitability Exploration eContract-based collaboration – What-concept

12. Suitability Exploration Pattern-based http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218843007001664

13. Expressiveness Exploration eXchangable Routing Language (XRL) – Instance-based workflow language – Petri-net semantics and XML syntax – Control-flow patterns give strong expressiveness Every routing element has WF-net (Petri-net variant) semantics – Allows for soundness verification with tool support Syntax is a tree – root element with exactly one routing element – Simple routing: no children routing elements – Complex routing: child-routing elements of specific order

14. eSourcing Markup Language Econtracting Markup Language ECML is foundation ECML delta towards eSouring – Incomplete suitability/expressiveness Bold eSML definitions are extensions – Resource definition – Data definition Who-extensions – resource/data-definition What-extensions – Control-flow-patterns Lifecycle definitions – Tasks/processes of collaborating parties – Mapped ontologically

15. eSML Application Semantics of some Declare templates

16. Conclusion Summary: eSML evolves out of systematic – Sociotechnical suitability/expressiveness exploration Real-life contracting foundation for eSML – Process-views are subsets of larger in-house processes ECML extension with eSourcing patterns – Conjoinments, monitorability, process views WF-net based control-flow semantics – Verifyable with tool-support XRL/flower as a proof-of-concept protoype – Pattern-set extension eSML by WF-net mapping library extension Future work – Cloud-based mobile business collaboration case studies – Safeguarding e-business transactionalities – Subsequent eSML extensions

17. Thank you for listening! Q&A