Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKaren Hardy Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rachel Edmondson – Adult Learner Analyst Tim Anderson – Data Collections Analyst
2
STARR Collection to Date 2014 STARR Collection Summary Overview of the changes to the 2015 Collection Reports on MI School Data
3
Quality of STARR data The reporting process Stakeholders MI School Data
4
Improvements of moving STARR to MSDS ◦ Same look and feel as IHE Request for UIC ◦ Field level validation, no longer just file level ◦ XML schema enforced ◦ Less embedded elements ◦ View student records
5
Challenges ◦ XML file structure changed ◦ Caused some submission errors, delays in submission ◦ Later submissions forced later Data Quality reports ◦ New Data Quality reports surprised some colleges ◦ UIC resolution process was cumbersome ◦ New software issues
6
Data surprises ◦ Duplicate session records Students in more than 1 academic program at a time ◦ GPA records 0.00 GPA rules ◦ Academic year Manual needed clarification
7
DQ Process ◦ Sent out Email detailing the DQ process Timeline Issues identified (Pre, Mid and Post) Internal Checks
8
Two New Data Elements ◦ Primary Academic Level flag Allows to designate primary academic program ◦ Military Status
9
Changes ◦ Residency Status Refine definitions Added OutOfDistrict ◦ High school student Moved to academic session, not student level Added enumerations ◦ Course Credit Basis New enumerations ◦ Entry Date & CTE Concentrator Moved to student level, not session level (this slide has changed from the presentation slide)
10
Changes ◦ Improved UIC system Eliminate duplicate resolutions ◦ Business Rules Eliminated business rules ◦ Include student data from May 2014 to April 2015 ◦ Greater emphasis for on-time submission
11
Concentrate on ◦ CIP Codes Degree Program Course ◦ Award and Program Data ◦ Transfer courses PostsecondaryEnrollmentType CourseAcademicGradeStatusCode
12
What is it? ◦ Portal for education data ◦ Helps citizens, educators and policy makers make decisions on the success of students
13
Reports ◦ Postsecondary Outcomes (by High School) College Enrollment by High School 24 College Credits College Remedial Coursework ◦ STARR Data Fields Entry Date, Session Designator, Academic Year Designator, Credits Earned, CourseCreditBasis
14
Reports ◦ Postsecondary College Undergraduate Enrollment College Transfer STARR Data Fields Entry Date, Academic Year Designator, Session Name, Session Designator, Student Level Code (degree seeking non-degree seeking), Postsecondary Enrollment Type, Race/Ethnicity, Cumulative GPA,
15
How many postsecondary students are prior-year high school graduates, degree seeking, or 24 years and under? 74.7% were age 24 and under 80.75% degree seeking 13.55% prior year MI high school graduates
16
How many students are transferring from and to 4-year Michigan public colleges? 49.7% of Macomb Communit y College students transferred to a 4-year MI public university 14.4% transferre d from a MI public 4-year to MSU
17
What is it ◦ Secure data file ◦ Student level data for each school, each session ◦ Coursework ◦ Cumulative credit, GPA ◦ Credentials earned No longer need to request performance data from higher ed MENU: OTHER/DATA FILES/STUDENT PATHWAYS OTHER/DATA FILES/STUDENT PATHWAYS (requires secure login)
18
WCC created a set of Access database shells to help educators take a closer look at Student Pathways data. Click on How-Tos & News
19
Send any questions to: ◦ Rachel Edmondson: Edmondsonr2@Michigan.govEdmondsonr2@Michigan.gov ◦ Tim Anderson AndersonT18@Michigan.govAndersonT18@Michigan.gov (this slide has changed from the presentation slide)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.