Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Peter Xiang Gao, S. Keshav University of Waterloo.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Peter Xiang Gao, S. Keshav University of Waterloo."— Presentation transcript:

1 Peter Xiang Gao, S. Keshav University of Waterloo

2 HVAC Energy use Buildings use 1/3 of all energy 30-50% of building energy is for HVAC Can save energy by changing temperature setpoint: 1 o C higher when cooling ≈ 10% saving 1 o C lower when heating ≈ 2-3% saving

3 Focus of this work Consider a single office heating system in winter Assume Thermal isolation Personal thermal control (heater)

4 Personal Office Thermal Comfort Management Office Corridor

5 SPOT+: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System Occupancy Prediction Learning-Based Modeling 500W f () + 1 o C -> Personal Thermal Comfort Evaluation Arrive officeLunch Setpoint Scheduling

6 SPOT+: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System Occupancy Prediction Learning-Based Modeling 500W f () + 1 o C -> Personal Thermal Comfort Evaluation Arrive officeLunch Setpoint Scheduling

7 Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) model Air Temperature, Background Radiation, Air Velocity, Humidity, Metabolic Rate, Clothing Level ColdCoolSlightly CoolNeutralSlightly WarmWarmHot -3-20123 ASHRAE Scale

8 SPOT [1] Clothing Sensing Microsoft Kinect: Detects occupancy Detects location of the user 5° infrared sensor: Detects users’ clothing surface temperature _______________________________ [1] P.X. Gao, S. Keshav, SPOT: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System, e-Energy 2013 WeatherDuck: Senses other environmental variables

9 Clothing level estimation Estimate clothing by measuring emitted infrared More clothing => lower infrared reading Clo = k * (t clothing – t background ) + b t clothing is the infrared measured from clothes on human body t background is the background infrared radiation k and b are parameters to be estimated by regression

10 Personalization PMV model represents the average for a single office, only the occupant’s vote matters Predicted Personal Vote (PPV) Model ppv = f ppv (pmv) where f ppv () is a linear function

11 SPOT+: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System Occupancy Prediction Learning-Based Modeling 500W f () + 1 o C -> Personal Thermal Comfort Evaluation Arrive officeLunch Setpoint Scheduling

12 Learning-Based Model Predictive Control We model the thermal characteristics of a room using LBMPC The model can predict future temperature = f lbmpc (current temperature, heater power)

13 Learning-Based Model Predictive Control

14

15 SPOT+: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System Occupancy Prediction Learning-Based Modeling 500W f () + 1 o C -> Personal Thermal Comfort Evaluation Arrive officeLunch Setpoint Scheduling

16 Occupancy Prediction We predict occupancy using historical data. Match Previous similar history Predict using matched records 0.3 1 1 1.3 0 _______________________________ [1] James Scott et. al., PreHeat: Controlling Home Heating With Occupancy Prediction, UbiComp 2011

17 SPOT+: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System Occupancy Prediction Learning-Based Modeling 500W f () + 1 o C -> Personal Thermal Comfort Evaluation Arrive officeLunch Setpoint Scheduling

18 Optimal Control We use the optimal control strategy to schedule the setpoint over a day. The control objective is to reduce energy consumption and still maintain thermal comfort Overall energy consumption in the optimization horizon S Weight of comfort, set to large value to guarantee comfort first Predicted occupancy, we only guarantee comfort when occupied. aka m(s) = 1 Thermal comfort penalty. Both term equal zero when the user feels comfortable

19 Optimal Control - Constraints ε is the tolerance of predicted personal vote (PPV) So when | ppv(x(s)) | is smaller than ε, there is no penalty Otherwise, either β c (s) or β h (s) will be positive to penalize the discomfort thermal environment

20 Evaluation

21 Evaluation of clothing level estimation Root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.0918 Linear correlation = 0.9201

22 Predicted Personal Vote Estimation Root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.5377 Linear correlation = 0.8182

23 Accuracy of LBMPC The RMSE over a day is 0.17C.

24 Accuracy of Occupancy Prediction The result of optimal prediction is affected by occupancy prediction. False negative 10.4% (From 6am. to 8pm.) False positive 8.0% (From 6am. to 8pm.) Still an open problem

25 Comparison of schemes

26 Limitations SPOT+ requires thermal Insulation for personal thermal control Current SPOT+ costs about $1000 PPV requires some initial calibration State of window/door is not modelled in the current LBMPC Accuracy of clothing level estimation is affected by Accuracy of Kinect Distance effect of the infrared sensor

27 Conclusion We extended PMV model for personalized thermal control We design and implement SPOT+ We use LBMPC and optimal control for personalized thermal control SPOT+ can accurately maintain personal comfort despite environmental fluctuations allows a worker to balance personal comfort with energy use.

28

29 Relationship between PPV and Energy cost Maintaining a PPV of 0 consumes about 6 kWh electricity daily. By setting the target PPV to -0.5, we can save about 3 kWh electricity per day.

30 Average Discomfort vs Energy Consumption


Download ppt "Peter Xiang Gao, S. Keshav University of Waterloo."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google