Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TECHNICAL ISSUE DISCUSSION Dave Peckitt, Senior Scientific Officer.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "TECHNICAL ISSUE DISCUSSION Dave Peckitt, Senior Scientific Officer."— Presentation transcript:

1 TECHNICAL ISSUE DISCUSSION Dave Peckitt, Senior Scientific Officer

2 Technical Basis for reforms  Derived primarily from MWHS 2011 Codes:  How to Control and Manage Asbestos in the Workplace  How to Safely Remove Asbestos  Retains prohibitions from existing HAR–some flexibility  Dovetail with:  Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste) Regulations 2004  Contaminated Sites Act 2003  Varied to cover wider range of scenarios & to afford greater public protection & rural needs

3 Main areas of reform  Mainly relate to ARW, particularly, removal  Requirement for licensed removalist if >10m 2 bonded ACM  Provision for justified exemptions  Notification requirement for <10m 2 removal  Requirement for licensed person for any ‘friable’  Prohibition on relocating AC building  Temporary removal & re-instatement of limited ACM  Pre-demolition asbestos survey/report & AMP

4 Contd.  Greater prescription of safe work practices – ‘beyond reasonable measures’  Greater enforcement power –act on suspicion, improvement, infringement notices, any ARW,  Others– storage deadlines? rural/remote locations? in situ management ? ………..

5 Requirement for licensed removalist for >10m 2 bonded ACM  10m² is the figure used nationally by OHS  Whilst arbitrary it an accepted threshold  If different, how high or low- or none?  <10m² potentially low risk versus cost of removalist e.g. for very small job  Inconsistency with OHS - undesirable

6 Provision for justified exemptions  Based on risk, remoteness, competence, etc,  Would apply to fences, & low risk situations  Guidance, templates & checklists to be provided  Additional work to LG as approving body?

7 Notification requirement for <10m 2 removal  Some LG favour a permit system for removal of <10m² of bonded ACM - any amount  EHD considers permit system too ambitious.  Foreseeable admin, resource& compliance issues  Prefer education or at most, a notification system (which would allow info provision & monitor/auditing)  In any case EHD will provide tools for agreed process

8 Temporary removal & re-instatement of limited ACM  Would allow access to areas behind/under bonded ACM e.g. wall panels & fences-  Required access to a service, or rear of property,  Code proposes <6m² max but WorkSafe prohibits reinstallation, once removed  Probably best to be consistent with OHS and not allow this?  If no re-instatement then notification required

9 Requirements for demolition of buildings  To include:  Survey & report  Providing report to demolisher & approving authority  Found or suspect ACM subject to management plan  Inspection of debris after demolition for ACM  Goes beyond 2005 and 2011 Codes  Some LG already have pre demo survey requirements  EHD hopes to also engage with Building Commission

10 Other Issues …………………… I’ll stop at this point thanks for your patience!


Download ppt "TECHNICAL ISSUE DISCUSSION Dave Peckitt, Senior Scientific Officer."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google