1. Offshore Developments
Topside Weight vs. Capacity
and Total Installed Power
Rev April 2015

2. Document Number : Rev Date Description DRL Engineering DRL Prepared
Checked
Approved
Review Date
Approve Date 1
6 April 2015
Topside Weight vs.BOE JS 2
7 April 2015
Update after Fact Check 3
13 April 2015
Simplify and combine BOE and MW 4
19 April 2015
Additional Data 5
21 April 2015
Schedule added 6
23 April 2015
Project Weight Update
Document Number :

3. PROCESS : OIL and GAS

4. HULL FORM

5. TOPSIDE WEIGHT vs. BOE by HULL FORM
Topside Weight is noticeably impacted by Hull Form Type
It is recommended that Data Analysis is carried out by Hull Form

6. TOPSIDE WEIGHT vs. BOE by HULL FORM
Topside Weight (excl. Rig) vs. BOE Comparison by Hull Form. Based on a Daily Design Throughput of 150,000 BOE the “Benchmark” Topside Dry Weight for each concept is :-
Multiple Deck FPSO 19,700 tonnes (131 kg/BOE)
Fixed Structure 14,500 tonnes (97 kg/BOE)
Conventional TLP 12,500 tonnes (83 kg/BOE)
Semi Submersible 12,500 tonnes (83 kg/BOE)
FPSO Conversion 10,500 tonnes (70 kg/BOE)
Single Lift SPAR ,600 tonnes (64 kg/BOE)

7. TENSION LEG PLATFORM

8. TENSION LEG PLATFORM

9. SPAR

10. SEMI SUBMERSIBLE

11. NEW BUILD FPSO

12. FPSO CONVERSIONS

13. Single Deck New Build FPSO’s
FPSO Conversions and
Single Deck New Build FPSO’s

14. FIXED STRUCTURES

15. BEST IN CLASS WEIGHT PERFORMANCE
New Build FPSO
Skarv
Bonga
Angola 18
Girassol
Dalia
Schiehallion
Balder
Terra Nova
Captain
Norne
FPSO Conversion
Vincent
Fife
Espadarte
Peregrino
Curlew
Bijipira & Salema
Cidade de Anchieta
Alvheim
Conkauati
Leadon
Ettrick
Abo
Tension Leg Platforms
Marco Polo
Shenzi
Prince
Mars A
SPAR
Horn Mountain
Neptune
Nansen
Boomvang
Gulfstar
Gunnision
Perdido
Semi Submersible
Independence Hub
Who Dat
Delta House
Na Kika
Visund
Njord
Atlantis
Thunder Horse
Thunder Hawk
Fixed Structures
Guntong A
North Cormorant
Nelson
Kepodang (Indonesia)
Lay Tay (Vietnam)
Erawan (Thailand)
North Rankin B
Draugen
Troll C
Petronious
Eider
Solan
KBB
Alen

16. Offshore Developments
Topside Weight vs. Total Installed Power in MW
(PGTs + Process GTs)

17. PROCESS : OIL and GAS

18. HULL FORM

19. TENSION LEG PLATFORM

20. SPAR

21. SPAR

22. SEMI SUBMERSIBLE

23. NEW BUILD FPSO

24. FPSO CONVERSIONS

25. FIXED STRUCTURES : OIL

26. FIXED STRUCTURES : GAS

27. BEST IN CLASS WEIGHT PERFORMANCE
Tension Leg Platforms
Mars A
Brutus
Magnolia
Prince
Marco Polo
Shenzi
SPAR
Gulfstar
Horn Mountain
Neptune
Medusa
Perdido
Mad Dog
Semi Submersible
Independence Hub
Atlantis
New Build FPSO
Bonga
Knarr
Angola 18
Schiehallion
Anasuria
Triton
Balder
FPSO Conversion
Abo
Peregrino
BC 10
Bijupira & Salema
Fixed Structures
Oil
Guntong
Kittiwake
Eider
Gas
Bunga Raya A
Jerneh
Laggan

28. Some of the TOP Weight Performers
HORN MOUNTAIN SPAR
INDEPENDENCE HUB
SEMI SUBMERSIBLE
MARCO POLO
MINI TLP
NEPTUNE
SPAR
MARS A
CONVENTIONAL TLP
SHENZI
MINI TLP

29. Some of the NON Gulf of Mexico TOP Weight Performers
GUNTONG A (MALAYSIA)
FIXED STRUCTURE
NORTH CORMORANT (NORTH SEA)
FIXED STRUCTURE
MODULAR
BUNGA RAYA A (MALAYSIA)
FIXED STRUCTURE – INTEGRATED DECK
NELSON (NORTH SEA)
FIXED STRUCTURE
INTEGRATED DECK

30. Some of the NON Gulf of Mexico TOP Weight Performers
BONGA (NIGERIA)
MULTIPLE DECK FPSO
PEREGRINO (BRAZIL)
FPSO CONVERSION
ANASURIA (NORTH SEA)
SINGLE DECK FPSO
SCHIEHALLION
(West of Shetland)
SINGLE DECK FPSO

31. Execution Duration vs. Topside Weight