Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElwin Watson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Failure Mode Effects Analysis Effects Analysis Risk Identification FMEA Risk Identification FMEA
2
Failure at 30,000 feet Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions2
3
Bottle Top Failure Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions3
4
Cause of Failure Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions4
5
Different Design Removes Risk Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions5
6
Happy Customer Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions6
7
Risks of Failure in both Design and Process Identified risks for customers, the business, our personnel and the environment, etc. Tool to help identify and prioritize risks Types of FMEA: Design FMEA – DFMEA Process FMEA - PFMEA Implementation FMEAs (for starting new processes) Special PFMEA (used as a specific problem solving tool) FMEA Tool Identifies Risks Quality Solutions7
8
n What in the process can go wrong? –Potential Failure Modes n When failure happens what is the effect on the customer and how bad is ailure? – Effect and Severity n Why does it happen and how often? –Causes and Occurrence n How will failure be detected and corrected before it leaves the process? –Controls and Detection PFMEA - Critical Questions Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions8
9
Risk Identification Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Function: Process Step Failure Mode Effects Severity (1-10) Causes Occurrence (1-10) Controls Detectability (1-10) RPN =Risk Priority Number RPN = S x O x D = 1 to 1000 RPN =Risk Priority Number RPN = S x O x D = 1 to 1000 Quality Solutions9
10
PFMEA Form 10
11
Quality by Design DFMEA Design Failure Mode Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions11
12
Design - DFMEA Format Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions12
13
Benefits -Design FMEA n Aids in design to reduce risks. n Evaluates design requirements / alternatives. n Identifies how a product may fail to meet its intended function. n Examines potential consequences of failure. n Prioritizes corrective actions needed. Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions13
14
Information Source n Boundaries for Customer change notification n Identifies special characteristics for PFMEA n Ranks potential failure modes according to their effect on the custome n Prioritizes risks & improvement opportunities n Problem Solving Tool when analyzing customer product concerns Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions14
15
Team Requirement ? n Team Activity Team Leader / FacilitatorTeam Leader / Facilitator Design and Development EngineersDesign and Development Engineers Process EngineersProcess Engineers Manufacturing Supervisors and OperatorsManufacturing Supervisors and Operators n Others Participate as Needed Quality AssuranceQuality Assurance Quality EngineersQuality Engineers Customers of ProductCustomers of Product Suppliers of Raw Materials and EquipmentSuppliers of Raw Materials and Equipment Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions15
16
Function, Expectation, Failure 1. List Product Functions Appearance, Performance, Processability,...Appearance, Performance, Processability,... 2. List Customer Expectations Appearance – Looks Good; Clean; Shiny; No defects...Appearance – Looks Good; Clean; Shiny; No defects... Performance – Resistant to damage; Starts and runs...Performance – Resistant to damage; Starts and runs... Processability – Easy to use & Easy to make...Processability – Easy to use & Easy to make... 3. Translate into Failure Modes Looks Good – Not shiny; Dirty; Not at expectations...Looks Good – Not shiny; Dirty; Not at expectations... No Defects – Scratches; Dents; Broken parts...No Defects – Scratches; Dents; Broken parts... Starts Easy – Will not start; Hard to start...Starts Easy – Will not start; Hard to start... Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions16
17
Functions & Failure Modes Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions17
18
Effects or Consequences n Identify Effects as perceived by Customer. n What could be the result of failure mode? n Describe in terms of what the customer might experience or notice. –Customer Dissatisfaction –Warranty Costs and Production Line Rework n Consider “Customer” to also be “internal customers” as well as final or ultimate end users. Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions18
19
Severity Ratings Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions19
20
Design Matrix n Materials and Parts Select Materials, Parts and Quantity Levels Select Materials, Parts and Quantity Levels – Material - Failure under 47% to over 58% by Weight –Part - Failure under X % to over Z % n Material and Part Characteristics Establish Material and Part Specifications Identify significant properties which have a major impact on final product performance – Material: Failure under or over amounts used –Part : Failure to meet specification (under/over ) Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions20
21
Design Matrix n Product Characteristics Select tests and specifications which determine the ultimate performance of the product. –Time to Temp.: Failure under or over specification –Solids - Failure under 65% to over 73% by weight –Pressure Test: Failure @ 5 psi n Process Constraints Identify significant manufacturing constraints –Equipment Required: Stainless, special tools –Space and Line Requirements: Sq Footage; height Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions21
22
Design Matrix n Conditions for Use Identify significant constraints in the conditions involved when the Customer uses of the product. involved when the Customer uses of the product. –Film Build - Failure under 2.0 mils. –Bake Time @ 350°F - Failure under 20 minutes. –Bake Temperature @ 20 min. - Failure under 350°F. –Shelf Life - Failure after Six Month –Storage Temperature - Failure over 70°F. –Humidity - Failure over 60% relative humidity –Temperature (paint): Failure under 50°F to over 120°F Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions22
23
Design Matrix - Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions23
24
Occurrence Table Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions24
25
DFMEA Form Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions25
26
Design Controls n Identify Design Controls Designed Experiments (DOE) Customer Validation Tests, Trial Runs Test Protocols, Test Methods Subcontractor Third Party Testing Engineering General Practice Ranges Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions26
27
Detection - Chance of Escape n How likely will design failures escape through our controls to customer? High likelihood = High numberHigh likelihood = High number Low likelihood = Low numberLow likelihood = Low number n Will current Design Controls detect and stop the causes of failure. Designed Experiments (DOE)Designed Experiments (DOE) MSA and Gage R&R resultsMSA and Gage R&R results Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions27
28
Design - Detection Table Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions28
29
Improvement Action Plan n Recommended Action(s) n Responsibility & Target Dates n Actions Taken n Resulting Risk Analysis SeveritySeverity OccurrenceOccurrence DetectionDetection RPNRPN Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions29
30
DFMEA Form Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions30
31
“Living Document” n Select Areas for Improvement. (high risk) Formulate plans for corrective actions.Formulate plans for corrective actions. Implement additional corrective actions.Implement additional corrective actions. Re-compute the risk assessment (RPN).Re-compute the risk assessment (RPN). n Up-Date and Maintain Update as new information is available.Update as new information is available. Record all changes made to Product or Process.Record all changes made to Product or Process. Revise as experience grows.Revise as experience grows. Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions31
32
Importance of Prioritization Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions32
33
Priority and Practicality Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions33
34
DFMEA – Cup of Coffee Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions34
35
DFMEA for Making Coffee Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions35
36
Functions & Failure Modes Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions36
37
Design Matrix - Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions37
38
DFMEA Form Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions38
39
Design FMEA Design FMEA Jeff PrahstQuality Solutions39
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.