1. 1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th 2007. Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering. CFD group The University of Manchester

2. 2 Summary Introduction: LES on a complex geometry Conservation of mass, momentum and total energy in the Navier-Stokes equations Test case: Taylor-Green vortices Results Future work

3. 3 Scales separation and levels of approximation. DNS LES RANS

4. 4 Various approaches to LES. Spectral method: High numerical accuracy Not suitable for complex geometries Finite Difference method: based on conservation law in differential form easy to implement and obtain high order scheme (on regular grid) not conservative method, need a special attention historically used only with structured meshes Finite Volume method: based on the conservation equations in their integral form easy formulation in any type of grid => easy implementation of unstructured meshes difficult to implement higher order scheme because of the three level of approximation (interpolation, differentiation, integration) Finite Element method: equations are approximated with polynomial functions Easy to use on arbitrary geometries and very strong mathematical background Linearized matrices not well structured => difficult to have efficient solutions PWR lower Plenum ( EDF Code Saturne)

5. 5 Span = 1 cell to 64 cells on body) Embedded refinement strategy 1 to 2 refinement with central differencing leads to spurious oscillations 2 to 3 refinement now systematically used

6. 6 Energy conservation in a continuous sense Energy Equation Kinetic energy Convective term Temporal term Pressure term Final Equation

7. 7 Colocated unstructured Finite Volumes - Ferziger & Peric: Computational Fluiid Dynamics, 3rd edt. Springer 2002. -“Face based” data-structure => simple - Fine for convection terms - Approximations come from interpolations and Taylor expansions from cell centres to cell faces

8. 8 Energy conservation in a discrete sense mass flux across face between cells I and J interpolation on IJ face contains the non-orthogonality correction interpolation weighing. If regular grid convection term for cell I is cancel locally if is constant cancel 2x2 if and FV conserves mass & momentum, Energy can only be conserved? Conservation of convective flux of “energy” between cells I and J ? Requirements: - centered in space and time, - regular mesh spacing, and no non-orthogonality corrections - mass flux may be explicit

9. 9 Energy conservation: Taylor-Green vortices test case.

10. 10 Taylor-Green vortices test case: mesh generation. Two different resolutions were tested: 1.40 x 40 2.60 x 60

11. 11 Taylor vortices 40 x 40 resolution: Energy conservation. Convective Flux Formulation: CD Velocity-pressure: SIMPLE 1e-4 Time step: 0.01 => CFL max < 0.2

12. 12 Taylor vortices 40 x 40 resolution: Energy conservation. Convective Flux Formulation: CD Velocity-pressure: SIMPLE 1e-4 Time step: 0.01 => CFL max < 0.2

13. 13 Energy conservation: effects of the mesh resolution. Convective Flux Formulation: CD Velocity-pressure: SIMPLE 1e-4 Time step: 0.01 => CFL max < 0.2

14. Energy conservation: Taylor-Green vortices test case. Mesh smoothing for LES see also Iaccarino & Ham, CTR briefs 05

15. Energy conservation: Taylor-Green vortices test case. Error map for the U velocity component for the Cartesian mesh 60x60 Error map of U for the Cartesian mesh 60x60 + 5-8 refinement Error map of U for the Cartesian mesh 60x60 + 1-2 refinement. Max error where the velocity is min and the V component is max. Max error in the middle

16. Energy conservation: Taylor-Green vortices test case. Velocity components are pointing in the wrong directions. Taylor- Green vortices for non conformal mesh ratio 1-2. The legend refers only to this graph. The time is 19 sec

17. 17 Taylor vortices 60 x 60 resolution: Effects of the velocity pressure coupling.

18. 18 Taylor vortices 60 x 60 resolution: Effects of the numerical scheme

19. 19 Taylor vortices 60 x 60 resolution: Effects of the velocity pressure coupling. Compression Factor: control the accuracy of the advection scheme.

20. 20 Conclusions and future work  Using of non conformal mesh can introduce spurious oscillation in the solution (noise).  Refinement ratio (RR) higher then 0.75 even with-out a specific sub-pattern.  When the Refinement Ratio is lower then 0.75 a defined sub-pattern is fundamental to have energy conservation.  RR = 0.5 (1-2) is affecting the solution also far from the interface, resulting in very bad energy conservation. Mesh adaptation didn’t produce any improvements.  Energy conservation is weakly influenced by the velocity-pressure coupling, it is instead highly influenced by the numerical scheme. Future work  Different way of interpolation of the fluid at the cell faces can produce improvements in the energy conservation properties  Possibility of new numerical schemes that provide energy conservation in unstructured meshes.  Effects of the viscosity.  Application of non conformal mesh for LES in complex geometries (Heated Rod Bundle)Acknowledgements This work was carried out as part of the TSEC programme KNOO and as such we are grateful to the EPSRC for funding under grant EP/C549465/1.