Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Realizability of Graphs Maria Belk and Robert Connelly
2
Motivation: the molecule problem A chemist determines the distances between atoms in a molecule: 7 7 4 4 7 4 2 5
3
Motivation: the molecule problem 1.Is this a possible configuration of points in 3 dimensions? 2.What is a possible configuration satisfying these distances? 7 7 4 4 7 4 2 5
4
Motivation: the molecule problem 1.Is this a possible configuration of points in 3 dimensions? 2.What is a possible configuration satisfying these distances? Unfortunately, these questions are NP-hard. We will answer a different question.
5
Definitions Definition: A realization of a graph is a function which assigns to each vertex of a point in some Euclidean space. Definition: A graph is -realizable if given any realization , …, of the graph in some finite dimensional Euclidean space, there exists a realization , …, in -dimensional Euclidean space with the same edge lengths.
6
Example: A path is 1-realizable.
7
Examples A tree is 1 - realizable. is 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. A cycle is also 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. Any graph containing a cycle is not 1-realizable.
8
Examples A tree is 1 - realizable. is 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. A cycle is also 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. Any graph containing a cycle is not 1-realizable.
9
Examples A tree is 1 - realizable. is 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. A cycle is also 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. Any graph containing a cycle is not 1-realizable. 1 11 0 0
10
Examples A tree is 1 - realizable. is 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. A cycle is also 2-realizable, but not 1-realizable. Any graph containing a cycle is not 1-realizable.
11
Theorem (Connelly) A graph is 1-realizable if and only if it is a forest (a disjoint collection of trees).
12
Definition. A minor of a graph is a graph obtained by a sequence of Edge deletions and Edge contractions (identify the two vertices belonging to the edge and remove any loops or multiple edges). Theorem. (Connelly) If is - realizable then every minor of is - realizable (this means -realizability is a minor monotone graph property).
13
Graph Minor Theorem Theorem (Robertson and Seymour). For a minor monotone graph property, there exists a finite list of graphs , …, such that a graph satisfies the minor monotone graph property if and only if does not have as a minor. Example: A graph is 1-realizable if and only if it does not contain as a minor.
14
Graph Minor Theorem By the Graph Minor Theorem: For each , there exists a finite list of graphs , …, such that a graph is -realizable if and only if it does not have any as a minor.
15
Forbidden Minors 1-realizable 2-realizable + ? 3-realizable + ?
16
-sum Suppose and both contain a . The -sum of and is the graph obtained by identifying the two ’s.
17
-trees -tree: -sums of ’s Example: a 1-tree is a tree
18
-trees -tree: -sums of ’s Example: 2-tree
19
-trees -tree: -sums of ’s Example: 3-tree
20
Partial -trees Partial -tree: subgraph of a -tree Example: partial 2-tree
21
Partial k-trees Theorem (Connelly). Partial -trees are -realizable.
22
2-realizability Theorem (Wagner, 1937). is a partial 2-tree if and only if does not contain as a minor. Theorem (Belk, Connelly). is 2-realizable if and only if does not contain as a minor.
23
Forbidden Minors 1-realizable 2-realizable 3-realizable + ?
24
Theorem (Arnborg, Proskurowski, Corneil) The forbidden minors for partial 3-trees.
25
Which of these graphs is 3-realizable?
26
Which of these graph is 3-realizable? NO
27
Which of these graph is 3-realizable? NO NO
28
Which of these graph is 3-realizable? NO NO YES YES
29
Are there any more forbidden minors for 3-realizability? Lemma (Belk and Connelly). If contains or as a minor then either contains or as a minor, or can be constructed by 2-sums and 1-sums of partial 3-trees, ’s, and ’s (and is thus 3-realizable). Theorem (Belk and Connelly). The forbidden minors for 3-realizability are and .
30
Are there any more forbidden minors for 3-realizability? Lemma (Belk and Connelly). If contains or as a minor then either contains or as a minor, or can be constructed by 2-sums and 1-sums of partial 3-trees, ’s, and ’s (and is thus 3-realizable). Theorem (Belk and Connelly). The forbidden minors for 3-realizability are and . NO
31
Forbidden Minors 1-realizable 2-realizable 3-realizable +
32
is not 3-realizable
40
and Theorem (Belk). and are 3-realizable. Idea of Proof: Pull 2 vertices as far apart as possible.
41
Conclusion Forbidden Minors Building Blocks 1-realizable 2-realizable 3-realizable , , ,
42
Open Question Which graphs are 4-realizable? – is a forbidden minor. –There is a generalization of , using a tetrahedron and a degenerate triangle. –However, there are over 75 forbidden minors for partial 4-trees.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.