Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharlotte Robertson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Biomechanical Properties of Healthy and Keratoconic Corneas Evaluated Using an Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera nznec Department of Ophthalmology University of Auckland New Zealand Prof. Charles McGhee Assoc. Prof. Dipika Patel Hans Vellara Dr Noor Ali The authors have no financial interests to disclose
2
Biomechanics Elastic Viscous The cornea is viscoelastic Energy Dissipated
3
Keratoconus – pathological process manifests as an underlying biomechanical failure Biomechanics & Keratoconus Protrusion and thinningVogt’s StriaeTomographical changes
4
What is it? Air Tonometer Ultra high speed Scheimpflug camera How does it work? Air puff indents cornea Video 4333 frames/sec Calculates a range of output measurements Parameters describe in vivo biomechanics CorVis ST
5
CorVis ST - Parameters Applanation1 Time Length Velocity Highest Concavity Deformation Amplitude Radius of Curvature Peak Distance Applanation2 Time Length Velocity Parameters describe in vivo biomechanics
6
Response to an air-pulse is not purely corneal Deformation response to an air-pulse includes: corneal deformation and the globe being pushed into the socket Air pulse Globe pushed into orbit
7
Method 134 Normal vs. 75 KC eyes Prospective cross sectional study Total Cornea Orbit Derived separated components from CST videos Using principles described by Koprowski et al Compared purely corneal component (max value)
8
Method 134 Normal vs. 75 KC eyes Temp Sym. = 1 (Elastic)Temp Sym. >1 (Viscous) We also compared the symmetry of the response 1212
9
Method 134 Normal vs. 75 KC eyes We also investigated the energy dissipated (Area within the force vs. displacement graph) Typical force vs. corneal displacement graph from a normal patient.
10
CorVis ST – Normal vs. KC Results Normal 37.7 550 0.23 1.09 0.81 KC 28.5 476 0.26 1.29 1.19 P-value 0.05 0.02 0.14 0.03 <0.001 Mean Age (years) Corneal thickness (µm) Max Corneal Deformation (mm) Temporal Symmetry Energy Dissipated
11
Results AUC = 0.77 (Max. Corneal Deformation) Normal Keratoconus Normal Keratoconus AUC = 0.60 (Temp. Symmetry) RoC Analysis – Not high enough to diagnose KC
12
Conclusion Temporal symmetry and maximum corneal deformation is significantly different between normal and KC eyes However, neither can be used alone to diagnose keratoconus
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.