1. Chromatin Modifications Vered Fishbain Reading Group in Computational Molecular Biology 21/12/2006

2. Some Definitions… Chromatin is the complex of DNA and proteins found inside the nuclei of eukaryotic cells. Chromatin is the complex of DNA and proteins found inside the nuclei of eukaryotic cells. Nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating subunits of all eukaryotic chromatin. They are made up of DNA and protein core, which is the histone core. Nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating subunits of all eukaryotic chromatin. They are made up of DNA and protein core, which is the histone core. The histone core is composed by two copies of the following set of proteins, called histones: The histone core is composed by two copies of the following set of proteins, called histones: H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. 147 bp in each nucleosome. 147 bp in each nucleosome. Heterochromatin is condensed chromatin, includes inactive genes and untranscribed regions (like the centromer). Heterochromatin is condensed chromatin, includes inactive genes and untranscribed regions (like the centromer). Euchromatin is non-condensed chromatin, includes active and repressed genes. Euchromatin is non-condensed chromatin, includes active and repressed genes.

3. 2 nm 11nm 30 nm 300 nm 700 nm 1400 nm 30 nm fiber of Packed nucleosomes Chromosomal loops Attached to nuclear scaffold Condensed section of metaphase chromosome Entire metaphase chromosome “Beads-on-a-string” Chromatin Packing Double helix 10 5  m 5-10  m ~x10 4 ~x7 ~x100

5. The Histone Core

6. Chromatin Modifications Chromatin modifications are covalent modifications that can effect transcription. Chromatin modifications are covalent modifications that can effect transcription. Acetylation Acetylation Methylation Methylation Phosphorylation Phosphorylation Ubiquitination Ubiquitination Sumoylation Sumoylation Adenosine-diphosphate ribosylation Adenosine-diphosphate ribosylation

7. Histone Acetylation Associated with transcription activation. Associated with transcription activation. Influence gene expression in (at least) two ways: Influence gene expression in (at least) two ways: 1. Neutralize Lysine’s positive charge, which can weaken DNA-histone contacts, or histone-histone contacts. 2. Acetyl-Lysine is bound by a specific protein domain that is found in many transcription factors and calls bromodomain. Rapidly reversible, and can turn over rapidly in vivo. Rapidly reversible, and can turn over rapidly in vivo.

8. Histone Methylation Characterized mainly for histone 3-lysin 4 (H3K4). Characterized mainly for histone 3-lysin 4 (H3K4). The Lysine can be mono-, di- or tri-methylated. The Lysine can be mono-, di- or tri-methylated. Doesn’t change the Lysine charge (naturally positive). Doesn’t change the Lysine charge (naturally positive). methyl-Lysine can be bound by a methyl-lysin binding domain, such as chromodomain, WD40 domain, Tudor domain, etc. methyl-Lysine can be bound by a methyl-lysin binding domain, such as chromodomain, WD40 domain, Tudor domain, etc. Long-lived. Long-lived.

9. Research Challenges Absence of sufficient verified data. Absence of sufficient verified data. Contradictory evidences. Contradictory evidences. The available data is in a low resolution. The available data is in a low resolution.

10. About immunoprecipitation. About immunoprecipitation.

11. Outline TAF1 as an acetyltransferase (HAT). TAF1 as an acetyltransferase (HAT). - TAF1 and Gcn5 – is there a redundancy? - TAF1 and other HATs in yeast (Durant and Pugh). Acetylation and methylation across promoters and ORFs (Pokholok et al.) Acetylation and methylation across promoters and ORFs (Pokholok et al.) High resolution mapping of acetylation and methylation (Liu et al.) High resolution mapping of acetylation and methylation (Liu et al.) - Identifying two major groups with similar modification patterns within. Summary (Millar and Grunstein) Summary (Millar and Grunstein)

12. Genome-Wide Relationships between TAF1 and Histone Acetyltransferases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Melissa Durant and B. Franklin Pugh Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2006

13. The transcription machinery assembles at promoters via two complexes, TFIID and SAGA, which have a compensatory function (Inna’s lecture…). The transcription machinery assembles at promoters via two complexes, TFIID and SAGA, which have a compensatory function (Inna’s lecture…). Both complexes contain subunits (TAF1 and Gcn5) that harbor bromodomain and acetyltransferase (HAT) activity. Both complexes contain subunits (TAF1 and Gcn5) that harbor bromodomain and acetyltransferase (HAT) activity. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the bromodomains appear on the TFIID-interacting protein Bdf1. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the bromodomains appear on the TFIID-interacting protein Bdf1.

15. Do TAF1 and Gcn5 play redundant role in yeast? Gcn5, and not TAF1, is important for bulk H3 acetylation levels. H3 Lysines:

16. Promoter vs. Non-promoters regions TAF1 is not a major H3K9, H3K14 acetyltransferase (HAT). Gcn5 is a HAT at most yeast promoters.

17. Acetylation and Transcription A strong correlation between H3 K9, K14 in W.T and without transcription (without PolII). A little REAL biology … Same Acetylation level in mutant and WT. Decrease in K8 acetylation. Acetylation of H4K8 is dependant on Elp3, a HAT that is associated with PolII during elongation, while acetylation in other sites in H4 might be less PolII dependent.

18. Gcn5 and TAF1 contribution to Gene Expression Recent studies: changes in gene expression for about 25% were observed only when both Gcn5 and TAF1 are eliminated. Recent studies: changes in gene expression for about 25% were observed only when both Gcn5 and TAF1 are eliminated. If Gcn5 and TAF1 each make independent contributions to transcription, the loss of both should be equivalent to the multiplicative result (additive on a log scale) of losing each individually. If Gcn5 and TAF1 each make independent contributions to transcription, the loss of both should be equivalent to the multiplicative result (additive on a log scale) of losing each individually. If the two are functionally redundant, the double mutant should result in an effect that is substantially greater than the multiplicative effects of the individual mutants. If the two are functionally redundant, the double mutant should result in an effect that is substantially greater than the multiplicative effects of the individual mutants.

19. Gcn5 and TAF1 contribution to Gene Expression TAF1 and Gcn5 make independent contribution to gene expression - No redundancy in TAF1 and Gcn5 function.

20. TAF1 redundancy with other HATs Sas3 Elp3 Hpa2 Hat1 Esa1 Their is no (or a very little) redundancy between TAF1 and each of the 5 tested HATs.

21. Some Other HATs and Acetylation Why there is no effect of any HAT mutant on acetylation? (i) Having highly selective gene targets. (ii) Having Lysine specificities other than those tested. (iii) Making transient contributions. (iv) Being highly redundant with other HATs.

22. TAF1 and Esa1 Esa1 is the main HAT for H4 acetylation of K5, K8, K12. 

23. What is the relationship between TFIID, TAF1, Bdf1 and Esa? Genes whose expression was significantly dependent on Esa1 or Taf1 were clustered by K- means into eight groups. Genes whose expression was significantly dependent on Esa1 or Taf1 were clustered by K- means into eight groups. Can the current model explain this behavior?

24. The current model

25. Acetylated H4 tails primarily bind Bdf1 which generally (but not always) bind TFIID.

26. Conclusions Taf1 and Gcn5 have no redundancy. In fact, Taf1 may not be a HAT in yeast. Taf1 and Gcn5 have no redundancy. In fact, Taf1 may not be a HAT in yeast. Transcription depends upon acetylation, but acetylation doesn’t depend upon transcription. Transcription depends upon acetylation, but acetylation doesn’t depend upon transcription. Gcn5 and Esa1 have a major gene regulatory HATs, but not Hat1, Elp3, Hpa2 and Sas3. Gcn5 and Esa1 have a major gene regulatory HATs, but not Hat1, Elp3, Hpa2 and Sas3. A model is suggested to define the mechanism linking Esa1, H4 acetylation, Bdf1 binding and TFIID recruitment. A model is suggested to define the mechanism linking Esa1, H4 acetylation, Bdf1 binding and TFIID recruitment.

27. Conclusions Taf1 and Gcn5 have no redundancy. In fact, Taf1 may not be a HAT in yeast. Taf1 and Gcn5 have no redundancy. In fact, Taf1 may not be a HAT in yeast. Transcription depends upon acetylation, but acetylation doesn’t depend upon transcription. Transcription depends upon acetylation, but acetylation doesn’t depend upon transcription. Gcn5 and Esa1 have a major gene regulatory HATs, but not Hat1, Elp3, Hpa2 and Sas3. Gcn5 and Esa1 have a major gene regulatory HATs, but not Hat1, Elp3, Hpa2 and Sas3.

28. Genome-wide Map of Nucleosome Acetylation and Methylation in Yeast Dmitry K. Pokholok, Christopher T. Harbison, Stuart Levine, Megan Cole, Nancy M. Hannett, Tong Ihn Lee, George W. Bell, Kimberly Walker, P. Alex Rolfe, Elizabeth Herbolsheimer, Julia Zeitlinger, Fran Lewitter, David K. Gifford, and Richard A. Young Cell, August 2005

29. Global Nucleosome Occupancy Nucleosome occupancy at the promoter of CPA1, a gene encoding an amino acid- biosynthetic enzyme. A composite profile of histone occupancy at 5,324 genes.

30. …Surprise! Differential enrichment of intergenic and genic regions also occurred in control experiments lacking antibody. After normalization to the control: No substantial differences in the relative levels of intergenic vs. genic DNA at the average gene, but 40% of the promoters have lower level of histones than their transcribed genes.

31. Is there a correlation between gene expression and nucleosome occupancy? The genes were divided into five classes of transcription level. Before NormalizationAfter Normalization Nucleosome occupancy is reduced maximally at the promoters of active genes.

32. Histone Acetylation Two HATs were checked: Gcn5, which acetylates H3K9 and H3K14, and Esa1, which acetylates the four residues of H4. Two HATs were checked: Gcn5, which acetylates H3K9 and H3K14, and Esa1, which acetylates the four residues of H4. The acetylation level were measured relative to the histones level. The acetylation level were measured relative to the histones level.

33. Histone Acetylation – results:

34. Histone Acetylation – Conclusion: There is a positive association between Gcn5, the modifications known to be catalyzed by Gcn5, and transcriptional activity. There is a positive association between Gcn5, the modifications known to be catalyzed by Gcn5, and transcriptional activity. There is also a positive association between Esa1, the modifications known to be catalyzed by Esa1, and transcriptional activity, although the association is not as strong as that observed for Gcn5. There is also a positive association between Esa1, the modifications known to be catalyzed by Esa1, and transcriptional activity, although the association is not as strong as that observed for Gcn5.

35. להוסיף למה המחקר שונה מהמחקר של קורדיסטאני ?

36. Three interesting trimethylation patterns were observed (Will be discusses later to details…) 1

37. 2 3

38. Histone Methylation - conclusions There is a positive correlation between H3K4 trimethylation near the 5’ end of transcribed gene and transcription rate. There is a positive correlation between H3K4 trimethylation near the 5’ end of transcribed gene and transcription rate. There is also a positive correlation between H3K36 trimethylation near the 3’ end of transcribed gene, and transcription rate. There is also a positive correlation between H3K36 trimethylation near the 3’ end of transcribed gene, and transcription rate. Somewhat correlation exists between H3K79 trimethylation and transcription rate. Somewhat correlation exists between H3K79 trimethylation and transcription rate.

39. http://web.wi.mit.edu/young/nucleosome/

40. Single-Nucleosome Mapping of Histone Modifications in S. cerevisiae Chih Long Liu, Tommy Kaplan, Minkyu Kim, Stephen Buratowski, Stuart L. Schreiber, Nir Friedman, Oliver J. Rando PLoS Biology, October 2005

41. For the first time, high-resolution measurement of histone modifications.

42. We can already see that: Histone modifications generally occur in broad range. Histone modifications generally occur in broad range. Modifications were generally homogeneous for all the probes within a given nucleosome. Modifications were generally homogeneous for all the probes within a given nucleosome. Correlations could be observed between a nucleosome’s position relative to coding regions and its modification pattern. Correlations could be observed between a nucleosome’s position relative to coding regions and its modification pattern. Low acetylation on heterochromatic regions. Low acetylation on heterochromatic regions.

43. Acetylation of H4K16 Transcription start site Genes

44. Methylation of H3K4: Gradient from tri- methylion in 5’, to di- methylation, and then to mono-metylation on the 3’. Transcription- independent modifications Transcription- dependent modifications

45. Nucleosomes

46. Correlation between modification the matrix of correlations between the 12 modifications shows that there are two groups of strongly correlated acetylations: Tri-methylation of H3K4 correlates with the larger group. Mono- and di- methylation orrelates with the smaller group.

47. Principal Component Analysis - PCA 81% of the variance in histone modification patterns is captured by these two principal components. Nucleosomes have continuous variation, both in the total level of acetylation, and in the relative ratio of the two groups of modifications, but they do not show much complexity beyond these two axes.

48. Principal Component Analysis - PCA Component #1: Overall level of histone modification. Component #1: Overall level of histone modification. Component #2: Relative levels of two groups of histone modification - the “Transcription - dependent modifications” that occur in 5’ to 3’ gradients over coding regions, and the “Transcription - independent modifications” that characterized by short hypo-acetyl domains surrounding TSS. Component #2: Relative levels of two groups of histone modification - the “Transcription - dependent modifications” that occur in 5’ to 3’ gradients over coding regions, and the “Transcription - independent modifications” that characterized by short hypo-acetyl domains surrounding TSS.

49. Association Between Chromosomal Location and Histone Modification

50. In the PCA plot, it is easy to distinguish between the promoters nucleosomes and the genic nucleosomes. Promoter Coding region

51. Moreover, it is possible to distinguish between the promoters nucleosomes and different coding regions (5’, middle and 3’). 5’ end Middle 3’ end

52. Conclusion Specific genomic regions are characterized by distinct modification patterns, with little overlap in modification types between the different regions. But… This correlation is imperfect, and it might be due to the different expression level of the genes. Is there a better correlation while separate genes according to the PolII activity level?

53. Highly Transcribed Genes Poorly Transcribed Genes

54. An arbitrary gene:

55. High PolII activity level Medium PolII activity level Low PolII activity level 5’ coding region nucleosomes Correct classification: 75.4%

56. Is there a difference between TSS proximal nucleosomes and TSS distal nucleosomes? TSS proximal nucleosomes TSS distal nucleosomes Modifications occur proximal to transcribed gene contain data about transcription level. Modifications occur distal to transcribed gene can’t help predict transcription level. Correct classification: 72.8% Correct classification: 58.4%

57. Association Between Modifications and Transcription Factor Domains

58. Modification Boundaries Tri-methylation for nucleosome N Tri-methylation for nucleosome N-1

59. Example of “punctate” nucleosome

60. Conclusions For the first time, modifications mapping in a single-nucleosome resolution. For the first time, modifications mapping in a single-nucleosome resolution. Two distinct groups of acetylation modifications. Two distinct groups of acetylation modifications. The modification patterns can be explained by only two principle components. The modification patterns can be explained by only two principle components. There is no “Histone Code”. There is no “Histone Code”.

61. Genome-wide patterns of histone modifications in yeast Catherine B. Millar and Michael Grunstein Nature, September 2006

62. Histone Modification Enzymes Substrate preference: In yeast, all known HMT methylate only one substrate. In yeast, all known HMT methylate only one substrate. HATs and HDACs act on several sites, but have distinct preferences. HATs and HDACs act on several sites, but have distinct preferences. Enzyme targeting: Specific targeting – recruitment by a transcription factor/repressor. This can result in a class-specific modification. Specific targeting – recruitment by a transcription factor/repressor. This can result in a class-specific modification. Global – function over large regions, irrespective of promoters and coding regions, and without TFs. Global targeting thought to be independent on transcription status. Global – function over large regions, irrespective of promoters and coding regions, and without TFs. Global targeting thought to be independent on transcription status.

63. Histone Modification Enzymes – cont. Some HATs function as subunits in a few complexes, one of them has a speciofic targeting and the other has a global targeting. Some HATs function as subunits in a few complexes, one of them has a speciofic targeting and the other has a global targeting. Some HATs have a large but limited region – usually enzymes that are involved in heterochromation formation. Some HATs have a large but limited region – usually enzymes that are involved in heterochromation formation. No specific HMTs are known to interact with TFs, but some do recruit specifically to coding regions. No specific HMTs are known to interact with TFs, but some do recruit specifically to coding regions.

64. Histone Modification Enzymes HAT HDAC HMT HDM

65. Distinct patterns in chromosomal locations Heterochromatin – no acetylation, methylation. Heterochromatin – no acetylation, methylation. Centromeric locations - usually surrounded by heterochromatin, but have a distinct modification pattern and also distinct from euchromatin modification patterns: dimethylation on H3K4 and hypoacetylation on h3K9, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12 and H4K16. Centromeric locations - usually surrounded by heterochromatin, but have a distinct modification pattern and also distinct from euchromatin modification patterns: dimethylation on H3K4 and hypoacetylation on h3K9, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12 and H4K16. H3 is replaced by the histone variant cenH3, with present no modifications on yeast. H3 is replaced by the histone variant cenH3, with present no modifications on yeast. CEN sequence… CEN sequence…

66. HAST domains and HZADs HAST domains and HZADs Hda1-affected subtelomeric domain (HAST) - groups of contiguous genes that are deacetylated by the HDAC Hda1, and are located in the subtelomeric euchromatin. Hda1-affected subtelomeric domain (HAST) - groups of contiguous genes that are deacetylated by the HDAC Hda1, and are located in the subtelomeric euchromatin. Htz1-activated domain (HZAD) - Adjacent subtelomeric genes, the expression of which is downregulated in the absence of the H2A variant Htz1. Htz1-activated domain (HZAD) - Adjacent subtelomeric genes, the expression of which is downregulated in the absence of the H2A variant Htz1.

68. Gradient of histone modifications in Active Genes

69. Patterns of multiple histone modification K-means clustering – identified groups of at least 20 promoters that have a similar acetylation state at 11 different sites, 53 clusters were defined (kurdistany et al.). K-means clustering – identified groups of at least 20 promoters that have a similar acetylation state at 11 different sites, 53 clusters were defined (kurdistany et al.). The promoters within 55% of these clusters share DNA-sequence motifs, whereas 26% bind similar transcription factors, and 23% of clusters contain promoters that lie upstream of genes that belong to the same functional category. The promoters within 55% of these clusters share DNA-sequence motifs, whereas 26% bind similar transcription factors, and 23% of clusters contain promoters that lie upstream of genes that belong to the same functional category.

70. Histone modifications in two different clusters

72. Thanks for your listening, and חנוכה שמח !!!