Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Computer simulations of the n- 4 He parity-violating spin-rotation experiment at NIST Bret Crawford Gettysburg College DNP Oct. 28, 2006.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Computer simulations of the n- 4 He parity-violating spin-rotation experiment at NIST Bret Crawford Gettysburg College DNP Oct. 28, 2006."— Presentation transcript:

1 Computer simulations of the n- 4 He parity-violating spin-rotation experiment at NIST Bret Crawford Gettysburg College DNP Oct. 28, 2006

2 Outline Systematic Effects –Ambient magnetic field rotations – 4 He diamagnetism –Neutron slowing down in liquid He target –Small angle scattering Simulation –Neutron transport –Modeling scattering cross section Future Plans

3 Ambient Magnetic Field Rotations Rotation angle Magnetic field suppression, longitudinal B<100  G B=100  G, L=1m, =5Ang Compare with experimental goal of Subtracting Data from Upstream and Downstream targets cancels non-target related effects

4 4 He Diamagnetism Reduces ambient external field B in target region Neutrons in target cell precess slightly less than neutrons in empty cell

5 Neutron slowing down in target Difference in indices of refraction between a full and empty target Neutron slows in target causing larger rotation in ambient field 100  G field in 1 meter

6 Small-angle scattering Upstream-downstream subtraction is incomplete –Lower energy for scattered neutrons (Up-target scatters travel farther at lower energy than down-target scatters) –path length of neutrons scattered in target is different for different target positions (down stream angle is larger) Target positions Wave guides detector

7 Small-angle scattering different detector solid angles from target positions From simulation see ~3% more scattered neutrons in Detector from Down target than Up target Amount of scattering into detector is small but not that small ~0.2% of detected neutrons have a new angle and new energy from scattering (simulation) With Up-Down subtraction non-PV rotations are in the few x10 -8 rad range Target positions Wave guides detector

8 Neutron Transport Simulation* Random trajectories within critical angle of guide If wall angle < critical angle, bounce; otherwise absorbed. wave guide (  c =1 mrad/Ang) input coil (  c =1 mrad/Ang) target cell (empty LU, full RD)s pi-coil between target output coil ASM (apertures only;  c =3 mrad/Ang) *Murad Sarsour, Mike Snow, Bret Crawford

9 Modeling the Scattering Cross section : n- 4 He Absorption is negligible Scattering is coherent Detailed knowledge of scattering at low momentum transfer is a research question Model for scattering in simulation code Choose q from S(q) Find energy from dispersion curve Calculate cross section from q and E Determine if scatters within target Follow new trajectory to target

10 Modeling the Scattering Cross section : n- 4 He S(q) Dispersion curve arbitrary q(1/Ang)

11 Scattering Cross section q<0.56 use Tsipenyuk and May results Tsipenyuk, May (arXiv:cond-mat/0207278 v1, 2002) -- unpublished data for S(0) q>0.56 use Sommers’ data Sommers, Dash and Goldstein (Phys Rev, 97)1954

12 Simulation energy at detector wavelength at detector

13 rotation angle for entire beam line – 477cm (no pi-coil) Rotation angle for B z =100  G  (all neutrons)  (scattered only)

14 rotation angle for entire beam line (pi-coil reverses rotation between targets) Rotation angle for B z =100  G Up Target  Down Target 

15 Large rotation values Up Target  Down Target  rotation angle for entire beam line (pi-coil reverses rotation between targets) Rotation angle for Bz=100  G

16 (U-D)/(U+D) Rotation angle for Bz=100  G  (mrad)

17 Simulation: Preliminary Results Neutron flux along beamline (z) * –Entering target 1 (UR): 23% –Entering target 2 (DL): 19% –Into detector: 11% Scattering Info –26% entering target scatter –0.2% entering detector have scattered, Rotation after Up-Down Subtraction, averaged over all neutrons (angles, energies, positions) – 100  G * initial angles chosen to be within critical angle of guide

18 Future Improve scattering model –Use x-ray data for low-q region of S(q) (R. Hallock, PRA 5, 1972) –Analytic calculation of double differential cross section Include multiple scattering Run for test targets

19 Neutron Transport Guide and Input Coil x[-3.05,-0.35],[0.35,305] y[-2.55,2.55] Output Coil and targets x[-3.0,-0.35],[0.35,30] y[-2.5,2.5] Supermirror x[-2.85,2.85] y[-2.25,2.25] Gaps [9.0, 6.8, 12.0] guideInput coiltargetsOutput coilASM 116cm89cm41.6cm 108cm28cm x z y Top View

20 Plots x-distribution entrancebefore target 1

21 Plots x-distribution after target 1 (UL)after target 2 (DR)

22 Plots x-distribution Before ASMdetector


Download ppt "Computer simulations of the n- 4 He parity-violating spin-rotation experiment at NIST Bret Crawford Gettysburg College DNP Oct. 28, 2006."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google