Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
2
Presented by: Mark Hendricks mark.hendricks@humboldt.edu
3
H U M B O L D T Background Mix of centralized and de- centralized IT support 10,000 active Student/Staff/Faculty 25,000 user entries in LDAP Small technical implementation team Committed to open source solutions when available
4
IMI Authentication Technical Team Bill Cannon – Director: Information Technology/ISO Nick DeRuyter – Manager: University Computing Services System Administrators Mark Hendricks Josh Callahan DBA Peter Johnson Analyst Programmers Michael Bradley Jason Hardin Help Desk Melinda Christensen Contact: Mark Hendricks – mark.hendricks@humboldt.edu
5
IMI Authentication Priorities Security!! Uniform password strength and policy enforcement Reduce password/secret exposure and vulnerability Improve logging User Experience Reduce logins/single sign-on Unify account information (NetID/Password) Single location for password management Administration Enforcement of policies for access to campus resources & confidential data Audit compliance Improve user administration efficiency (IT Systems & Services)
6
Design Goals Open source Create authN / AuthZ capable of supporting all applications Minimize complexity Minimize auth sources Want IMI infrastructure that will support centralized and decentralized management
7
Initial IMI Auth Infrastructure
8
Password Management/Synchronization
9
Active Directory Why AD? Windows desktop majority Distributed Windows desktop management using centralized authentication and dynamic groups Supports AuthN/AuthZ for most major operating systems “out of the box”
10
Desktop AuthN AuthZ Support
11
Active Directory Windows desktop majority Distributed Windows desktop management using centralized authentication and dynamic groups Supports AuthN/AuthZ for most major operating systems “out of the box” –Windows XP/2000 –Mac OS X –Unix (Tru64) –Linux –Samba Minimal schema extensions required Based on LDAP and Kerberos Kerberos prepares for Single Sign-On
12
Kerberos MIT vs. Microsoft Benefits –Single Sign-on - Ticket Passing –Non proprietary –Unified and secure password repository –Passwords outside Windows AD –Reduces password/secret exposure –Unified logging –Easy set up/Robust Problems –Difficult to obtain functional documentation/support –Learning curve for users & technical team –Not supported by all applications –Problems with OS integration
13
Where Are We Now? Progress Password Interface Password Synchronization Group Interface LDAP/AD/Kerberos Desktop Auth Email route/alias Library authN, authZ Wireless Auth Misc. Apache Auth Future Portal Guest Accounts Meta-Directory LDAP Standard Library Student (Central) Shares Kiosk Open Directory (Apple) Email
14
CSU Support/Collaboration CSU / eduPerson / group schema - courses Functional working groups / conference - Vendors CSU web page/list for directory/authentication collaboration CSU Grants for code and documentation development CSU Certificate Authority or contract with public CA
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.