Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lecture 13 Psyc 300A. Review Confounding, extraneous variables Operational definitions Random sampling vs random assignment Internal validity Null hypothesis.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lecture 13 Psyc 300A. Review Confounding, extraneous variables Operational definitions Random sampling vs random assignment Internal validity Null hypothesis."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lecture 13 Psyc 300A

2 Review Confounding, extraneous variables Operational definitions Random sampling vs random assignment Internal validity Null hypothesis Type I and type II errors

3 Review: Confounding and extraneous variables Extraneous variables can be confounds, but can also add variability (noise). For each, provide extraneous variable and confound: Study 1: Effect of distraction on pain perception using cold immersion. Study 2: Do girls benefit from sixth grade middle school?

4 Review: Operational definitions For each of the previous studies, operationalize the IV and DV

5 Review: Random sampling vs random assignment What is the difference between the two? Random assignment is a way to prevent confounding

6 Review: Internal validity What is internal validity? Internal validity: Ability to make valid inferences concerning the relationship between the IV and DV in an experiment. (effect on the DV is caused only by the IV)

7 Type I and Type II Errors Accept the Null Hypothesis Reject the Null Hypothesis Null is really True (chance is responsible) Correct Decision Type I Error Null is really False (chance is not responsible) Type II Error Correct Decision

8 Power Power is the probability of avoiding a Type II error. Power is related to: –Alpha level –Effect size (mean and sd) –Number of participants

9 Using More Than Two Levels of an IV What is a level of an IV? In an experiment with an experimental and control group, how many levels? Can we have more than two levels? Example: –Golf club study –Anxiety management techniques for speech-giving Graphing the relationship

10 Advantages of Multi-level Designs Efficiency (fewer participants needed and less time) Ability to see relationships better –Ex: Caffeine and Performance (0, 2, 4 cups of coffee)

11 Graphing Relationships: One IV

12 Multifactor Designs Factorial design: A design in which all levels of each IV are combined with all levels of the other IVs. Advantages of factorial designs: –More efficient (fewer participants and less experimenter time) –Allows us to see how variables interact

13 Example: Movie Preferences MenWomenMean Romantic364.5 Action745.5 Mean55

14 What a Factorial Design Tells You Main effect: The effect of an IV on the DV, ignoring all other factors in the study Interaction effect: When the effect of one IV on a DV differs depending on the level of a second IV. Graphing a factorial design Interpreting the interaction first

15 Examples of Main Effects and Interactions A1= morning A2= late afternoon B1= high fat diet B2= low fat diet DV: 0-50 rating of energy level

16 More Main Effects and Interactions A1= morning A2= late afternoon B1= high fat diet B2= low fat diet DV: 0-50 rating of energy level

17 More Main Effects and Interactions A1= morning A2= late afternoon B1= high fat diet B2= low fat diet DV: 0-50 rating of energy level

18 Group Activity: Main Effects and Interactions Make graphs of the following situations: Var AVar BAxB interaction p <.05 n.s. p <.05 n.s.p <.05 n.s. p <.05

19 Factorial Designs: Naming Conventions The first number is the number of levels in first IV, second number is number of levels in second IV, etc. 2 x 2 2 x 3 2 x 2 x 3 Between-subjects, repeated measures (within), mixed

20 A 2 x 3 Interaction


Download ppt "Lecture 13 Psyc 300A. Review Confounding, extraneous variables Operational definitions Random sampling vs random assignment Internal validity Null hypothesis."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google