1. 1 Johannes Schneider Transactional Memory: How to Perform Load Adaption in a Simple And Distributed Manner Johannes Schneider David Hasenfratz Roger Wattenhofer

2. 2 Johannes Schneider “computer science will become washing machine science.“ Without easy and efficient parallel programming methods…

3. How to handle access to shared data?  Locks, Monitors…  Coarse grained vs. fine grained locking easy but slow program demanding, time consuming but fast programs  Problems  difficult  error prone  Composability …… Johannes Schneider lock all data modify/use data unlock all data lock A lock B modify/use A,B lock C modify/use A,B,C unlock A modify/use B,C unlock B,C lock B lock A modify/use A,B unlock A,B Deadlock! Only 1 thread can execute 3 Thread 1 Thread 2

4. Transactional memory(TM) - a possible solution  Simple for the programmer  Composable  Idea from database community  Many TM systems (internally) still use locks  But the TM system (not the programmer) takes care of  Performance  Correctness (no deadlocks...) Johannes Schneider Begin transaction modify/use data End transaction Method A.x() Begin Transaction B.y() … End Transaction Method B.y() Begin transaction … End transaction 4

5. Transactional memory systems  If transactions modify different data, everything is ok  the same data, conflicts arise that must be resolved  Transactions might get delayed or aborted  Job of a contention manager  A transaction keeps track of all modified values  It restores all values, if it is aborted  A transaction successfully finishes with a commit Johannes Schneider 5

6.  Abort or delay a transaction, i.e. adapt load  Distributed  Each thread has its own manager  Example  Initially: A=1, B=1 Manager 1 Manager 2 T1 Trans. 1 T1 Trans. 2 B:=2 … A:=3 … conflict … A:=2 … ‏ Abort (undo all changes, i.e. set A:=1)‏ and restart (after a while) T1 Trans.1 … A:=2 … Trans. 2 B:=2 … A:=3 … conflict Abort (set B:=1) and restart OR wait and retry Conflicts – A contention manager decides Johannes Schneider 6 Manager 1 Manager 2 Delay to adapt load!

7. Prior work  Contention Managers [PODC03,PODC05,ISAAC09…]  System load was not (explicitly) considered  Load adaption (based on contention)  Estimate contention intensity: CI [SPAA08]  If abort: CI = a CI + (1-a) with parameter a [0,1]  If commit: CI = a CI  If CI > parameter b then resort to central scheduler  Keep a transaction queue per core [PODC08]  Central dispatcher assigns transactions to a core, i.e. its queue  Each core iteratively executes transactions from queue  If transaction A on core 1 is aborted due to B on core 2 then A is appended to the queue of core 2  Central scheduler will become a bottleneck Johannes Schneider 7 Core 1 Core 2 A B C D Core 1 Core 2 A B C D B aborts A

8. This paper  Theoretical analysis  Decentralized (simple) approaches to load adaption  based on contention Johannes Schneider 8

9. Strategies  Ignore: Do not learn from conflicts  ImmediateRestart  Stay real: Remember faced conflicts  SerializeFacedConflicts  Do not schedule prior conflicting transactions concurrently  Be cautious: Assume additional conflicts  SerializeAll  All transactions in a subgraph are assumed to conflict Johannes Schneider 9 B A D C Conflict graph A conflicted with C D conflicted with B A D C B A D C B A C B D

10. Load Adaption Strategies  AbortBackoff  If aborted wait for a random time [0,2 #aborts ]  Priority = number of aborts #aborts  Who wins a conflict?  2 strategies  Estimate the work done  Unrelated to work done Johannes Schneider 10

11. Theory Part - Model  n transactions (and threads)  Start concurrently on n cores  Transaction  sequence of operations  operation takes 1 time unit  duration (number of operations) t T is fixed  2 types of operations  Write = modify (shared) resource and lock it until commit  Compute/abort/commit  Ignore overhead of load adaption  Remembering transactions, scheduling… Johannes Schneider 11 Core 1 Core 2 B A Core n Z … A

12. Moderate parallelism  Shared counter  Conflicts directly after transaction start  Linked List  Conflicts at arbitrary time  Expected time span until all transactions committed  Speed-up log n (at best) Johannes Schneider 12 PolicyCounterList ImmediateRestart AbortBackoff SerializeFacedConflicts SerializeAll Transaction run time #transactions

13. Substantial parallelism  Worst case  Conflict graph is d-ary tree of logarithmic height  Exponential gap in worst case  SerializeAll and others Johannes Schneider 13 PolicyTime until transactions committed ImmediateRestart AbortBackoff SerializeFacedConflicts SerializeAll T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 …

14. Practical investigation  Remembering conflicts causes too much overhead  Good for analysis but not for implementation  Quickadapter  Serializes transactions  Each core has a “waiting” flag  If aborted, set flag and wait until flag unset  If commit, unset some flag  AbortBackOff  (Also considered some variants) Johannes Schneider 14

15. Practical investigation  Evaluation on 16 core machine  DSTM2 system  Visible readers  Six benchmarks  Little parallelism  Shared counter, Sorted List (accessed objects not released), Listcounter  Considerable parallelism  Red Black Tree, LFUCache, RandomAccessArray  Compare new load adaption policies to existing contention managers Johannes Schneider 15

16. Discussion  Hard to keep maximum throughput, also in [SPAA08, PODC08]  Even without conflicts  Improvement for 1 benchmark worsens another  On average better than schemes without load adaption 16 Johannes Schneider

17. Conclusion  Simple and distributed load adaption strategies  Theory  (For now) constants and parameters matter a lot  Practice  Hard to keep load at peak for all usage patterns 17 Johannes Schneider

18. 18 Johannes Schneider \vspace{10pt} Thanks for your attention! Questions? ???

19. Analysis AbortBackoff for counter  Recall: If aborted wait for a random time [0,2 #aborts ]  Assume #aborts ~ log (nt T ) + x (for some x)  Define: a(x) := fraction of active nodes  a(0) = 1 (after time ~2 log (nt T ) = nt T a constant fraction still active)  Chance conflict for interval [0,2 #aborts ] Interval [0, 2 log(ntT)+x ] ~ a(x) nt T / 2 log (nt T ) +x = a(x) /2 x  a(x+1) = a(x)/2 x = 1/2 ∑ i=0..x i ~ 1/2 x 2  a(√log n) = 1/2 (√log n) 2 = 1/n  ∑ i=0.. log (nt T ) +√log n length interval = ∑ i=0.... log (nt T ) +√log n 2 i = nt T 2 √log n+1 Johannes Schneider 19 T1 T2 T3 a(x)nt T = 3/n n t T = 3t T