1. Day: Thursday 10 th November Session: 14.30am - 15.30 Coordinators: Ian Williamson & Stig Enemark Topic:Components of the vision- break out groups

2. Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9 th Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Report Back - Discussion European Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby Evaluate – Components of the vision

3. Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Report Back - Discussion Australian Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle Evaluate – Components of the vision Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10 th

4. Report Back - Discussion Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Day 3 – Friday Nov 11 th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel

5. The Paradigm 1.What is the vision for an ICT enabled LAS to support sustainable development? 2.Is a common understanding possible? 3.Is this “land management” or “land information management”?

6. The Paradigm/framework/model 1.Summary -People dimension to the paradigm -Process aspect – two way interaction e.g. two way arrows, interaction between policy and land information -Outcome related model – need to try and capture outcomes in the model -Capacity building at society, institutional, data process and individual level – renewable self sustaining cycle -What sort of society, quality of life, personally and as a community do you want and hence what are the systems/infrastructure needed to deliver this ie. Distribution of wealth, identification an protection of assets, protection and enhancement of the environment. All of this requires core information (including land) to underpin decision making and the outcomes -How do you quantify the linkages between the land information systems and outcomes -Need to take into account culture and value systems

7. Key Drivers 1.Rank in importance the key drivers 2.Is tax (in all its forms) a driver?

8. Key Drivers 1.Summary -Remaining responsive to user needs at a whole of government level -Productivity as a result of IT application -Environmental needs – monitoring -Security -Revenue raising through tax -Image/pride -Knowledge – how do we unpack the knowledge capital – intangibles (systems, processes, people) within an organisation -Meeting public expectation – servicing the citizen -The drivers we have now are a natural extension of the data collection effort to meet public expectation

9. Key Components and Tools 1.Authentic registers? 2.The IT architecture to deliver the vision? 3.The spatial dimension- SDI? 4.Infrastructure to support trading in complex commodities?

10. -Will we feel confident about the quality of our registers/datasets that we will guarantee them -Quality assurance framework -Strong engagement of local government needed – missing from the model -Built environment is an element that we are not capturing information on as well as natural environment - local government could have a greater impact here -Must be a spatial dimension to LAS Key Components and Tools

11. 1.Summary -Core business -Spatial dimension -RRR dimension -Tax and valuation -Land development -Modern planning is a value adding user of our information which should lead to sustainable development -Role of providing information to land users that want to make decisions about the use of land -Land management will be more sustainably practised as a result of land information -Interoperability – connectivity between the user and the need – taking into account the needs of the future -We are in the business of land information management for the plethora of user needs and land management outcomes

12. Future Challenges, Issues & Improvements 1.Achieving a national system in a federated country 2.Achieving spatially enabled government 3.Should the land registry system contribute to SD? How? 4.Relationship between the land registry and spatial cadastre 5.Can international comparative monitoring be established? 6.Administration of restrictions and responsibilities 7.Is the land parcel still central to LA? 8.The role of buildings in land administration

13. Future Challengers, Issues & Improvements 1.Summary -Engagement and interaction between all levels of government -Shared vision, values and systems within a federated system that facilitates interoperability -Need for unified data models, semantics and structures to support this – progressed to a greater extent in Europe -Find catalyst (such as counter terrorism) to accelerate achievements of a national significance e.g. increased tax and more functional property markets through e-conveyancing -Heading towards national systems -Marketing and presentation – recognising the client -Remember SDI is an infrastructure and enabling platform for data integration, data sharing, data access – not an end in itself -Data to data and data to people -Bundling / unbundling of rights – does this service sustainable development – recognising that we still need to identify RRR of which some will have a value -Value of property street address – this is what people use, not Lot/Plan number