Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
10-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Managing Compensation Chapter 10
2
10-2 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall What is compensation? Defined Components Designing a Compensation System Compensation tools Job-Based Compensation Skill-Based Compensation Legal Environment and Pay System Governance Chapter 10 Overview
3
10-3 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Total Compensation Sum total of quantifiable rewards Received for an employee’s labor What Is Compensation? Pay Mix—proportion of each of: Base compensation Pay incentives Indirect compensation (benefits) o Perquisites— “perks”
4
10-4 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation System— want design that: Enables firm to achieve its strategic objectives Is molded to unique characteristics of firm Nine features in compensation systems Compensation System Design Equity— perceived fairness of the design Internal—pay structure within a firm External—what other employers are paying Individual—of individual pay decisions
5
10-5 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation Systems: Equity Distributive Justice Model Perceptions of fairness within the firm Compare themselves to other employees o What they bring and what they receive Labor Market Model Wage rate determined by supply and demand
6
10-6 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation System Design Balancing Equity To improve external equity Use alternate forms of compensation E.g. bonuses, add-ons, counteroffers
7
10-7 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation System Design Fixed vs. Variable Pay Performance vs. Membership
8
10-8 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Job versus Individual Pay Job-Based Pay— best when: Jobs and technology are stable Much training required to learn a given job Turnover is relatively low Individual-Based Pay— best when: Company and environment is dynamic Workforce is relatively educated And willing and ability to learn different jobs Participation and teamwork are encouraged Are opportunities to learn new skills
9
10-9 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Egalitarian pay system— same pay system For most employees Reduces barriers between workers Easier to deploy workers to other jobs Egalitarianism vs. Elitism Elitist pay system— different pay systems For employees or groups at different organizational levels Result in more stable workforce
10
10-10 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Above vs. Below-market Above-market—minimizes turnover Below-market—save money Compensation System Design Monetary vs. Nonmonetary rewards Monetary—emphasis on achievement Nonmonetary—reinforce organization commitment
11
10-11 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Open vs. Secret pay Open—fosters trust and commitment o Forces managers to be fair administering Secret—leads to dissatisfaction with pay Compensation System Design Centralized vs. Decentralized pay Decisions Centralized—maximizes internal equity o But doesn’t handle external equity issues well Decentralized—better for large, diverse organizations
12
10-12 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Job-based compensation plans —three parts: Achieving internal equity Achieving external equity Achieving individual equity Compensation Tools: Job-Based Plans Job evaluation— to achieve internal equity Six steps Provide rational, orderly judgment of importance of each job to the firm
13
10-13 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Step 1: Conduct job analysis Steps to Achieving Internal Equity Step 2: Write job description Step 3: Determine job specifications Characteristics needed to perform job Step 4: Rate worth of all jobs Point Factor System most commonly used Uses Compensable Factors to rate jobs
14
10-14 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Step 5: Create a job hierarchy Job listing by relative value Steps to Achieving Internal Equity Step 6: Classify jobs by grade levels
15
10-15 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Achieving External Equity Step 1: Identify benchmark or key jobs Check salary surveys Step 2: Establish pay policy Lead, lag, or pay market rate
16
10-16 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Market Salary Data for Selected Benchmark Office Jobs
17
10-17 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Individual assigned pay within a range Achieving Individual Equity Within-pay-range positioning criteria: Previous experience Seniority Performance appraisal ratings
18
10-18 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation Tools: Job-Based Plans Advantages: Rational, objective, systematic Relatively easy to administer Drawbacks: Do not account for nature of business Job descriptions often too general Wage and salary data not definitive Job-based plans tend to be bureaucratic, mechanistic and inflexible
19
10-19 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation Tools: Skill-Based Plans Skill mastery increases pay Three types of skills: Depth skills—specialized area Breadth Skills—jobs/tasks in firm Vertical skills—self-management Workforce is more flexible Higher training costs Skills can become “rusty”
20
10-20 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) Exempt/Non-exempt employees Minimum wage and Overtime The Legal Environment and Pay Systems Governance The Equal Pay Act (1963) Exemptions: seniority, job performance, or other factors (e.g. shift differential) Comparable worth Office of Federal Contract Compliance
21
10-21 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Compensation: base, incentives, and benefits Summary and Conclusions Effective compensation systems: Help firm to achieve strategic objectives Suited to organization’s unique characteristics Fits organization’s environment Don’t forget: Employee input in job evaluation process Legal environment
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.