1. 1 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 1 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Coherent X-ray Imaging WBS 1.3 CXI Component Status, Cost and Schedule Paul Montanez CXI Lead Engineer/CAM June 3, 2009

2. 2 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 2 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Outline WBS 1.3 Scope Early Science/CD-4 Deliverables Progress since CD-2 Status Engineering/Design Status Cost & Schedule Performance Critical Path Milestones Risk Identification & Mitigation Safety Summary

3. 3 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 3 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Acronyms PRD Physics Requirements Document ESD Engineering Specifications Document SOW Statement of Work ICD Interface Control Document PDR Preliminary Design Review FDR Final Design Review BAC Budget at Completion BCR Baseline Change Request XRT X-ray Transport Tunnel FEH H5 Far Experimental Hall Hutch 5

4. 4 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 4 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 WBS 1.3 – Early Science/CD-4 Deliverables Early Science: Early Finish – April 2011 (B/L Early Finish – May 2011) CD-4: Early Finish – January 2012 (B/L Early Finish – November 2011)

5. 5 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 5 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Progress Since CD-2 CXI Engineering/Design staff Added 1 Mechanical Engineer & 1 Mechanical Designer – October 2008 Added 2 Mechanical Engineers & 1 Mechanical Designer – March 2009 Added 1 Mechanical Engineer – April 2009 All documentation completed & released PRDs, ESDs, SOW’s, etc. 1µm Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system Authorization to proceed with advanced procurement Vendor site-visits Mirror system RFP released, proposals received and vendor selection made April 27, 2009 Award in June 2009 Design Reviews Preliminary Design Reviews completed CXI 1µm Sample Chamber & Reference Laser – March 2009 CXI Detector Stage & 1µm Precision Instrument Stand – May 2009 Baseline vibration data obtained in the LCLS Far Experimental Hall Vertical/Horizontal PSD, 1-100Hz Measured near location of 1µm KB system

6. 6 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 6 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status CXI Engineering/Design staff Armin Busse, Kay Fox, Paul Montanez, William Olson, Michael Ramos, Donald Schafer, Nathaniel Stewart Diagnostics & Wavefront Monitor 1 micron Sample Environment 0.1 micron KB & Sample Environment, Particle Injector and IToF 1 micron KB Reference Laser Diagnostics/Common Optics CXI Early Science CXI CD-4

7. 7 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 7 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (2) Documentation CAD system model documentation hierarchy (CAD Drawing Tree/File Structure) released XRT/FEH H5 beamline layout complete with all available models implemented & updated 26 PRDs/ESDs released, 10 SOWs/ICDs released Hutch Design Reviewed 30%, 60%, 90% & 100% A/E drawings FEH Hutch construction – June thru December 2009 (LCLS) APP and Risk Identification/Registry complete and up-to-date

8. 8 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 8 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (3) CXI 0.1µm KB system (WBS 1.3.02.01) PRD, ESD & SOWs released Procurement included as an “option” for the CXI 1µm KB contract Delivery November 2010 BAC ≈ $1,400K CXI 1µm KB system (WBS 1.3.02.02) PRD, ESD & SOWs released Prime vendor to provide complete and integrated KB system, including: Figured & Polished Substrates Mirror Mechanics/Manipulators Vacuum chamber and support stand MOU for independent metrology/coating of the substrates LLNL likely candidate based on past experience with LCLS OMS mirrors Secured the services of an optics expert to assist with the evaluation of all procurement documents and to participate as a member of the Proposal Evaluation Committee Procurement Activities Advance Procurement Review – October 2008 (required for advanced procurement authorization) Design Review Report TR-391-003-10 “CXI 1 Micron K-B Mirror System Advanced Procurement Technical Review” Vendor site-visits by CXI staff – Q1 FY09 Prequalification of vendors – December 2008/January 2009 Posted on Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website RFP sent to vendors – January 2009 Vendor proposals received – 24 March 2009 Proposal Evaluation Committee Meeting – 9 April 2009 Recommend a vendor to the Source Selection Official on April 27 th Award in June 2009 Delivery October 2010 Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $1,280K ($970,000 in long lead procurement)

9. 9 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 9 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (4) CXI Reference Laser (WBS 1.3.03.1) PRD & ESD released Successful PDR held March 2009 Design Review Report TR-391-003-19-0 Consider Class 2, 1mW, green laser (initially Class 3R, red) Appropriate signage for laser safety Additional interlocks for equipment protection FDR scheduled for July 2009 Start fabrication drawings No significant design/cost changes since CD-2 Use mechanical designs for the vacuum chamber and 6-DOF alignment stage that have previously sustained reviews Leveraging existing designs (when applicable) reduces our overall engineering/design effort. Additionally, helps to ensure commonality within the LUSI instruments Budget at Completion (BAC) ≈ $126K Vacuum chamber cover/laser cover removed/sectioned for clarity

10. 10 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 10 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (5) Particle Injector (WBS 1.3.04.01) PRD & ESD released Existing Injector design from LLNL CXI will advance the current design Optimization of particle beam throughput Remote operation of equipment SLAC/LLNL Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed-off February 2009 “Collaboration on the sample particle injector for the Coherent X-ray Imagining (CXI) instrument” generation or exchange of research and test results, data, and know-how fabrication or exchange of equipment financial or other contributions to activities being undertaken exchange of personnel Physics Level of Effort (LOE) began upon MOU sign-off, engineering to follow as required PDR scheduled for September 2009 BAC ≈ $1,470K

11. 11 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 11 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (6) CXI Sample Chambers (WBS 1.3.05.01.01) 1µm Sample Chamber PRD & ESD released Successful PDR held March 2009 Design Review Report TR-391-003-20-0 Currently addressing PDR “Action Items” Piezo-stage vibration/stability due to stack-up Equipment protection for in-vacuum stages (potential for clashing) FDR “Early Finish” scheduled for September 2009 FDR will be accelerated to July 2009 BAC ≈ $620K 0.1µm Sample Chamber PRD & ESD released PDR scheduled for March 2010 Chamber proper will likely be an integral part of the 0.1µm KB vacuum chamber BAC ≈ $500K

12. 12 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 12 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (7) CXI Precision Instrument Stands (WBS 1.3.05.01.02) 1µm Precision Instrument Stand PRD & ESD released Support /Interface with 1µm Sample Chamber and Detector Stage (in all experimental configurations) Engineering/Design effort, beyond conceptual design, began in March 2009 PDR completed May 15, 2009: Design Review Report TR-391-003-27-0 Determine the effect of lateral seismic loads on rod ends Evaluate potential back-driving of ball screws due to seismic loading and ameliorate any effects FDR scheduled for July 2009 BAC ≈ $240K 0.1µm Precision Instrument Stand PRD & ESD released Support 0.1µm Sample Chamber, Detector Stage and 0.1µm KB System PDR scheduled for April 2010 BAC ≈ $330K

13. 13 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 13 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (8) Detector Stage (WBS 1.3.05.01.03) PRD, ESD, SOWs & ICDs released Cornell detector mechanical design progressing SLAC PPA mechanical engineering completing design for a variable aperture detector Complete assembly by October 2009 to meet LCLS CD-4 Purchase order placed in March 2009 with a local design firm for the mechanical design and drafting of the CXI Detector Stage – CXI was resource limited Move design forward in the schedule Vendor design reviews PDR completed May 15, 2009: Design Review Report TR-391-003-27-0 Explore options to prevent any interference between the detector and valve aperture Consider methods to determine the vibration amplitude of the cantilevered detector Develop plans for the fiducialization of the detector relative to the vacuum chamber FDR – July 2009 BAC ≈ $330K Cornell/SLAC detector with variable aperture CXI Detector Stage with Cornell/SLAC detector

14. 14 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 14 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (9) CXI Hutch Facilities (WBS 1.3.06.01 & 1.3.06.02) Hutch layout design Raised flooring Storage cabinets, work benches and tool chests Utilities distribution BAC ≈ $350K CXI Vacuum System (WBS 1.3.07.01 & 1.3.07.02) Requirements In general, beamline vacuum better than 10 -7 Torr Better than 10 -9 Torr for KB Systems – isolation/differential pumping from HV required Preliminary design of a compact, 2 stage, differential pump system complete Vacuum equipment: pumps, valves, gauges, etc. Bellows and Spools Use LCLS support stands where applicable (diagnostics supports/beampipe supports) to leverage existing engineering/design effort PDRs Vacuum Equipment – June 2009 Vacuum Supports – November 2009 BAC ≈ $700K B 4 C “throttles” & Guard

15. 15 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 15 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Engineering/Design Status (10) Installation (WBS 1.3.08.01) LUSI Installation Coordinator Obtain required installation permits Conduct daily tailgate meeting w/ UTR (University Technical Representative) Conduit to engineering for field installation issues Provide installation status for incorporation into LUSI schedule CXI has a “phased installation” Early Science Diagnostics/Common Optics Reference Laser 1µm Sample Chamber & Precision Instrument Stand 1µm KB System Detector Stage Vacuum Equipment/Hardware/Supports Early Finish – May 2011 CD-4 Diagnostics/Common Optics 0.1µm Sample Chamber & Precision Instrument Stand 0.1µm KB System Particle Injector/IToF Vacuum Equipment/Hardware/Supports Early Finish – January 2012

16. 16 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 16 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Cost & Schedule Performance Month end March 2009 cumulative schedule variance (-) Month end March 2009 cumulative cost variance (+)

17. 17 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 17 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 CXI Critical Path Critical path (thru 1µm KB System) has 9d of schedule contingency KB Mirror Design/Fabrication Effort KB Mirror AWARD & Vendor Design Post Vendor Effort and Installation KB Mirror Installation Effort

18. 18 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 18 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 CXI Milestones All dates are early finish

19. 19 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 19 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 CXI Milestones (2) Significant recent & near-term CXI Instrument milestones Current schedule (March 2009 data) vs. CD-2 approved schedule (October 2008) Moved FIDR to June 2009 so that subsequent activities allow for the CD-3 Review to occur in July 2009 L2: DOE Site Office Authority (COMPLETE/APPROVED) L3: Interface Milestones/Major Events L4: Systems (COMP/RCV) L6: Commitments/Awards (AWARD)

20. 20 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 20 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 CXI Milestones (3) Six month “look-ahead” of CXI Instrument milestones Current schedule vs. CD-2 approved dates (October 2008) 4 PDRs completed to-date CXI Reference Laser CXI 1µm Sample Chamber CXI Detector Stage CXI 1.0µm Prec. Inst. Std. 2 Vendor Contract Awards (KBs) 2 Vendor Preliminary Design Reviews (PDR) – KBs 5 Final Design Reviews (FDR) LCLS – Cornell Detector Packaging

21. 21 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 21 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Risk Identification & Mitigation Risk Identification/Registry complete and up to date as per “LCLS Risk Management Plan” PMD 1.1-002-r4 3 (of 17) risks retired prior to CD-2 9 (of 17) risks retired since CD-2 KB Mirror Systems Vendor can’t meet 0.1µm mirror specifications – Technical Vendor can’t meet 1µm mirror specifications – Technical No vendor willing to bid on 1µm mirrors – Technical & Schedule No vendor willing to bid on 1µm mirror mechanical system – Technical & Schedule No resident experience designing mirror mechanical system – Technical & Schedule 45˚ KB configuration – Technical Sample Chambers Custom piezo-stages for Sample Chambers cannot be made – Technical & Schedule Cornell detector Last minute changes to detector design – Technical & Schedule Detector Stage Custom linear translation stage for CXI Detector Stage – Technical Outstanding risks relate to Procurement – As discussed by Tom in his introduction (2X) Delivered KB mirror systems don’t meet specifications (2X) Particle injector Interfaces with adjacent beamlines

22. 22 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 22 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Safety LUSI Hazard Analysis Report (PM-391-001-34) complete Safety issues are considered at every stage of the design, fabrication and installation process Safety considerations (some examples) Ionizing Radiation Hutch walls will comply with SLAC Radiation Safety memo RP-RPG-080606-MEM-01 Hutch PPS Pressure/Vacuum Vessel Safety Compliant with 10CFR851 Approved vacuum procedures Seismic Safety Designs compliant with: Seismic Design Specification for Buildings, Structures, Equipment, and Systems, SLAC-I-720-0A24E-002-R002 Mechanical Interlocks for equipment protection Engineered solutions that prevent potential “pinch-points” with moving machinery Hoisting and Rigging Positioning of devices that require use of the FEH H5 overhead crane shall be performed only by qualified personnel with an approved lift plan. Laser Safety CXI Reference Laser, Class 2, 1mW Appropriate signage

23. 23 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 23 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Summary CXI designs are mature and concepts are based on proven developments made at FLASH and SR sources CXI scope is stable and has not changed since CD-2 Long Lead Procurement Committee evaluation of vendor proposals for the 1µm KB system occurred on April 9, 2009 Procurement recommendation on April 27, 2009 Contract award expected in June 2009 0.1µm KB system is an “option” included in the 1µm KB system RFP Critical Path schedule contingency is 9d – continuously monitored Most major risks associated with the KB mirror systems have been retired Remaining KB risks will be addressed during design/manufacture and testing FIDR is being held now as a prerequisite for the CD-3 review in July 2009 Replanning of LUSI WBS 1.3 (CXI) due to ARRA funding and general scheduling enhancements in process Pending BCR #2009-05-02: CXI Omnibus Replanning CXI is on track to support an accelerated schedule

24. 24 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 24 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009

25. 25 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 25 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Cost & Schedule Performance CXI month end March data BCWS BCWP ACWP SPI CPI

26. 26 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 26 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Cost & Schedule Performance – WBS 1.3

27. 27 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 27 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Cost & Schedule Performance – WBS 1.3

28. 28 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 28 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Expanded CSSR – by CAM

29. 29 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 29 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Control Accounts & Work Packages – by WBS L2

30. 30 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 30 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 P3 Files Milestones – by WBS L2

31. 31 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 31 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Labor/Non-labor Split – WBS 1.3

32. 32 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 32 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Split by Phase – WBS 1.3

33. 33 Paul Montanez, P.E. montanez@SLAC.Stanford.EDU 33 CXI Final Instrument Design Review June 3, 2009 Procurements and Dollars – WBS