Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
EHE Neutrino Search with the IceCube Aya Ishihara The University of Wisconsin - Madison for the EHE Verification working group
2
Outline Expected the highest energy region signal neutrinos How they might look like from the point of IceCube detector Results from MC simulation analysis with full and this year’s configuration Outlook toward real data analysis with 9 strings
3
Recent Activities by EHE Working Group Convener: Shigeru Y. Muon Reconstruction: Sean G., Keiichi M., David B. Tau Reconstruction: Rodin P. MC study: Shigeru, Kotoyo H., Aya I. MC (semi-) mass production: Paolo D., Keiichi Data check: Hiroko M., Kotoyo, Aya See Shigeru’s talk @ analysis session on Thursday
4
Extremely High Energy Neutrino Possible Signals… Standard scenarios Ex. GZK mechanism – EHE cosmic-ray induced neutrinos ( E ~ 10 9-10 GeV ) Exotic scenarios Ex. Top-Down – decays/interaction of massive particles ( E ~ 10 11-15 GeV )
5
EHE Neutrino with km 3 Detector (I) Where to look for events? Filtering from large background - Atmospheric distinguishable by their energy Need good energy resolution EHE neutrino mean free path ~ 100 km << R Earth down-going up-going EHE neutrino events are down-going Not up-going
6
EHE Neutrino with km 3 Detector (II) How do they look like? Series of cascade Energy deposit indicates the primary particle energy e+e-e+e- pair-creation bremsstrahlung photo-nuclear
7
IceCube EHE Event Channels Possible EHE particles in depth Atm Secondary and E GZK >> E Atm Fluxes at the IceCube depth
8
MC Simulation Setup Event Samples Muon events with E -1 spectra 95,000 events Muon events with E -2 spectra 110,000 events Tau events with E -1 spectra 99,000 events 10 5 GeV ~ 10 11 GeV
9
Simple Primary Energy Indicator Estimated total number of photo-electrons per event Contained Uncontained Contained Uncontained
10
How NPE is Estimated from Waveforms (I) Log 10 ( ATWD estimated NPE ) Estimated number of photo-electrons per DOM ATWD or FADC? Log 10 (FADC based estimated NPE ) Log 10 (ATWD based estimated NPE ) Log 10 ( FADC estimated NPE) Log 10 (MC Truth NPE ) Red: DOM of which ATWD charge is larger Blue: DOM FADC is larger Integrated charge over a waveform divided by single pe charge
11
How NPE is Estimated from Waveforms (II) MC Truth NPE vs. Larger Charge waveform based estimated NPE per DOM Log 10 (MC Truth NPE ) Log 10 ( Best estimated NPE ) This, “use the larger charge waveform”, in principle applies also for the finer waveform based reco
12
Signal vs. Background: Energy/event-sum NPE GZK Atmospheric GZK Contained events only
13
Event Rate without Background Cut GZK GZK Atmospheric GZK GZK Atmospheric Zenith angle NPE up down
14
Signal Domain: Zenith/NPE GZK Atmospheric
15
Event Rate in Signal Domain GZK 3.5 events/year GZK 0.56 events/year Atmospheric 0.33 events/year GZK GZK Atmospheric GZK GZK Atmospheric
16
Event Rate based on simple reconstruction GZK GZK Atmospheric GZK GZK Atmospheric
17
Event Rate with 9-strings GZK 0.67 events/year Atmospheric 0.0085 events/year GZK Atmospheric GZK Atmospheric AMANDA IceCube
18
For taus… GZK Atmospheric Assuming we have extremely good geometrical reconstruction,
19
Event Rate with the optimistic cut GZK GZK Atmospheric GZK GZK Atmospheric
20
Muon Effective Area – Full String Black (up-going): -1.0 < cos( MC ) < -0.8 Red: -0.6 cos( MC ) < -0.4 Blue (horizontal, slightly up-going) -0.2 < cos( MC ) < 0.0 Pink: 0.4 < cos( MC ) < 0.6 Green (down-going): 0.8 < cos( MC ) < 1.0
21
Effective Area – 9 strings ~10 % strings are much more than 10 % as an effective area ! Black (up-going): -1.0 < cos( MC ) < -0.8 Red: -0.6 cos( MC ) < -0.4 Blue (horizontal, slightly up-going) -0.2 < cos( MC ) < 0.0 Pink: 0.4 < cos( MC ) < 0.6 Green (down-going): 0.8 < cos( MC ) < 1.0
22
Summary and Outlook IceCube is indeed capable of detecting EHE neutrinos with both full and this year’s 9-string configuration First-level background filtering can be done with very simple parameters such as NPE-sum, zenith Further understandings of detector performance Comparison between real data and MC simulation Energy and geometrical reconstructions!!
23
Extra
24
N_DOM vs. NPE with 9 strings
25
April 11, 2006IceCube Collaboration Meeting25 Event Rate vs. Primary Energy
26
Predicted Fluxes
27
9-string Geo
28
The IceCube Detector
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.