Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Examining Our Campus Climate at San Jose State University Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology Dr. Rona Halualani, Communication Studies Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Examining Our Campus Climate at San Jose State University Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology Dr. Rona Halualani, Communication Studies Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology."— Presentation transcript:

1 Examining Our Campus Climate at San Jose State University Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology Dr. Rona Halualani, Communication Studies Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology Dr. Rona Halualani, Communication Studies

2 Preview & Purpose  Wiggsy Sivertsen, Chair, Campus Climate Committee

3 What Did We Do?  Purpose  Campus climate is defined as “the formal environment in which we learn, teach, and work, and live in a post-secondary setting.”  Purpose  Campus climate is defined as “the formal environment in which we learn, teach, and work, and live in a post-secondary setting.”

4 What Did We Do?  Research Method: Survey  Time Span  Procedures  Sampling  Items/Constructs  Analysis Procedures  Research Method: Survey  Time Span  Procedures  Sampling  Items/Constructs  Analysis Procedures

5 What Did We Do?  Examples of Constructs

6 What The Students Report  356 students (12% response rate)  Demographics  64% female, 33% male  40% White, 33% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 12% Latino/a, 4% Black/African American  7% gay, lesbian, or bisexual  5% with disability  356 students (12% response rate)  Demographics  64% female, 33% male  40% White, 33% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 12% Latino/a, 4% Black/African American  7% gay, lesbian, or bisexual  5% with disability

7 What The Students Report  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Many students(67%) have “somewhat” to “very” favorable” perceptions of campus climate at SJSU,  BUT several subgroups of students view the campus climate less favorably.  Most students (81%) do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of students report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.  Overall, students (54%) reported that they have learned “somewhat” to “a great deal” about racism, discrimination based on disability, sexism, homophobia in their classes at SJSU.  BUT such learning varied widely among different majors.  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Many students(67%) have “somewhat” to “very” favorable” perceptions of campus climate at SJSU,  BUT several subgroups of students view the campus climate less favorably.  Most students (81%) do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of students report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.  Overall, students (54%) reported that they have learned “somewhat” to “a great deal” about racism, discrimination based on disability, sexism, homophobia in their classes at SJSU.  BUT such learning varied widely among different majors.

8 What The Students Report  Campus Diversity  Only about 40% of students know how to officially report racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  Many students (65%-85%) do not fear for their physical safety on campus and do not feel uncomfortable disclosing their sexual orientation or discussing racially sensitive topics.  BUT several subgroups of students feel uncomfortable about one of these topics.  Most students (79%) value the work that SJSU is doing to promote diversity.  Campus Diversity  Only about 40% of students know how to officially report racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  Many students (65%-85%) do not fear for their physical safety on campus and do not feel uncomfortable disclosing their sexual orientation or discussing racially sensitive topics.  BUT several subgroups of students feel uncomfortable about one of these topics.  Most students (79%) value the work that SJSU is doing to promote diversity.

9 What The Students Report  Learning Environment  Many students (67%) report that there are role models for them on campus.  Most students (84%) agreed that SJSU staff is sensitive about ethnic/racial, sexist, and homophobic issues.  BUT several subgroups of students report that SJSSU is less sensitive to these issues.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Overall, 68% of students are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have on SJSU’s campus climate.  Learning Environment  Many students (67%) report that there are role models for them on campus.  Most students (84%) agreed that SJSU staff is sensitive about ethnic/racial, sexist, and homophobic issues.  BUT several subgroups of students report that SJSSU is less sensitive to these issues.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Overall, 68% of students are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have on SJSU’s campus climate.

10 What the Students Report  Qualitative Portion:  29% response rate (103)  Experiences of negative service at SJSU (18%; 18)  Feelings of alienation and marginalization as White students (16%; 16)  Negative experiences in specific majors with faculty (16%; 16)  Qualitative Portion:  29% response rate (103)  Experiences of negative service at SJSU (18%; 18)  Feelings of alienation and marginalization as White students (16%; 16)  Negative experiences in specific majors with faculty (16%; 16)

11 What the Students Report  Qualitative Portion:  Need better layout and services for disabled students (10%; 10)  Need for more campus safety measures (8%; 8)  No tolerance for conservative views of students (8%; 8)  Qualitative Portion:  Need better layout and services for disabled students (10%; 10)  Need for more campus safety measures (8%; 8)  No tolerance for conservative views of students (8%; 8)

12 What the Students Report  Qualitative Portion:  SJSU focuses too much on diversity (5%; 5)  Need for more community on campus (- commuter image) (5%; 5)  Need for more information about how to report discrimination (5%; 5)  Qualitative Portion:  SJSU focuses too much on diversity (5%; 5)  Need for more community on campus (- commuter image) (5%; 5)  Need for more information about how to report discrimination (5%; 5)

13 What The Faculty Report  407 Faculty (24% response rate)  Demographics  46% male, 48% female  60% White, 10% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 16% Latino(a), 3% Black/African American  10% gay, lesbian, bisexual  9% with a disability  37% tenured, 57% not tenured  34% part-time  27% full, 13% associate, 15% assistant professors, 31% lecturer, 4% instructor  407 Faculty (24% response rate)  Demographics  46% male, 48% female  60% White, 10% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 16% Latino(a), 3% Black/African American  10% gay, lesbian, bisexual  9% with a disability  37% tenured, 57% not tenured  34% part-time  27% full, 13% associate, 15% assistant professors, 31% lecturer, 4% instructor

14 What The Faculty Report  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Most faculty have “somewhat” to “very” favorable perceptions of the campus climate at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of faculty view the campus climate less favorably.  The majority of faculty do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of faculty report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Most faculty have “somewhat” to “very” favorable perceptions of the campus climate at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of faculty view the campus climate less favorably.  The majority of faculty do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of faculty report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.

15 What The Faculty Report  Job Satisfaction  Faculty (76%) are satisfied with their jobs.  BUT they are not satisfied with several aspects of their jobs.  Campus Diversity  Many faculty (75%) report that they know how to officially report racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  The majority of faculty do not fear for their physical safety on campus and do not feel uncomfortable disclosing their sexual orientation or discussing racially sensitive tics.  BUT several subgroups of faculty) feel uncomfortable about one of these topics.  Job Satisfaction  Faculty (76%) are satisfied with their jobs.  BUT they are not satisfied with several aspects of their jobs.  Campus Diversity  Many faculty (75%) report that they know how to officially report racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  The majority of faculty do not fear for their physical safety on campus and do not feel uncomfortable disclosing their sexual orientation or discussing racially sensitive tics.  BUT several subgroups of faculty) feel uncomfortable about one of these topics.

16 What The Faculty Report  The Working Environment  Faculty (76%) feel that SJSU is a good place to work.  BUT only 48% of faculty perceive that faculty morale is good at this campus.  Some faculty (30%) believe that those who are openly critical of their department’s administration have cause to fear retribution  Faculty are concerned with workload.  Faculty (47%) do not agree that ethnic minority faculty are adequately represented on important Academic Senate committees.  About 40% of the faculty report that subtle discrimination is tolerated on campus.  Several subgroups agree more.  The Working Environment  Faculty (76%) feel that SJSU is a good place to work.  BUT only 48% of faculty perceive that faculty morale is good at this campus.  Some faculty (30%) believe that those who are openly critical of their department’s administration have cause to fear retribution  Faculty are concerned with workload.  Faculty (47%) do not agree that ethnic minority faculty are adequately represented on important Academic Senate committees.  About 40% of the faculty report that subtle discrimination is tolerated on campus.  Several subgroups agree more.

17 What The Faculty Report  Concerns About Supports and Rewards for Faculty  Faculty are concerned with opportunities for professional development (i.e., funds, release time).  Only 53% of the faculty believe that they are equitably compensated in comparison to their colleagues in their own department.  Almost half of lecturers do not agree that the evaluation process for lecturers is fair and equitable.  Concerns About Supports and Rewards for Faculty  Faculty are concerned with opportunities for professional development (i.e., funds, release time).  Only 53% of the faculty believe that they are equitably compensated in comparison to their colleagues in their own department.  Almost half of lecturers do not agree that the evaluation process for lecturers is fair and equitable.

18 What The Faculty Report  Tenure and Promotion  Only 60% of the faculty agree that they receive adequate mentoring on tenure and promotion.  A small portion of the faculty (40%) do not believe that in the RTP process, their service to the campus is rewarded by their department.  Only 57% of the faculty believe that the RTP process is fair and equitable.  Tenure and Promotion  Only 60% of the faculty agree that they receive adequate mentoring on tenure and promotion.  A small portion of the faculty (40%) do not believe that in the RTP process, their service to the campus is rewarded by their department.  Only 57% of the faculty believe that the RTP process is fair and equitable.

19 What The Faculty Report  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Overall, 68% of the faculty are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have an SJSU’s campus climate.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Overall, 68% of the faculty are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have an SJSU’s campus climate.

20 What The Faculty Report  Qualitative Portion:  34% response rate (138)  Campus climate as positive (16%; 22)  Excessive workload (17%; 12)  Salary (10%; 13)  Facilities (10%; 13)  SJSU bureaucracy (10%; 13)  Diversity efforts as important (9%; 12)  Treatment of lecturers (6%; 8)  Concerns with student preparation (5%; 7)  Too much effort on diversity (5%; 7)  Qualitative Portion:  34% response rate (138)  Campus climate as positive (16%; 22)  Excessive workload (17%; 12)  Salary (10%; 13)  Facilities (10%; 13)  SJSU bureaucracy (10%; 13)  Diversity efforts as important (9%; 12)  Treatment of lecturers (6%; 8)  Concerns with student preparation (5%; 7)  Too much effort on diversity (5%; 7)

21 What The Staff Report  318 Staff (23% response rate)  Demographics  27% male and 69% female  40% White, 23% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 19% Latino(a), 3% Black/African American  4% gay, lesbian, or bisexual  8% with a disability  318 Staff (23% response rate)  Demographics  27% male and 69% female  40% White, 23% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 19% Latino(a), 3% Black/African American  4% gay, lesbian, or bisexual  8% with a disability

22 What The Staff Report  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Most staff (59%) have “somewhat” to “very” favorable perceptions of the campus climate at SJSU.  The majority of staff do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups report report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Most staff (59%) have “somewhat” to “very” favorable perceptions of the campus climate at SJSU.  The majority of staff do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups report report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.

23 What The Staff Report  Job Satisfaction  Most staff are satisfied with their jobs.  Among the staff who hand a job change, 20% of them report that they felt discriminated against on the basis of ‘inside’ candidate.  Campus Diversity  Most staff (76%) know how to officially report any racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  Job Satisfaction  Most staff are satisfied with their jobs.  Among the staff who hand a job change, 20% of them report that they felt discriminated against on the basis of ‘inside’ candidate.  Campus Diversity  Most staff (76%) know how to officially report any racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.

24 What The Staff Report  Many staff (78%) value the work that SJSU is doing to celebrate diversity.  Many staff (76%) report that they know how to officially report any racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  Some staff (24%) do fear for their physical safety and feel uncomfortable discussing racially sensitive topics on campus.  A specific subgroup of staff report they feel uncomfortable about some of these issues.  Many staff (78%) value the work that SJSU is doing to celebrate diversity.  Many staff (76%) report that they know how to officially report any racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  Some staff (24%) do fear for their physical safety and feel uncomfortable discussing racially sensitive topics on campus.  A specific subgroup of staff report they feel uncomfortable about some of these issues.

25 What The Staff Report  The Working Conditions  Most staff (82%) believe that SJSU is a good place to work.  BUT some staff (40%) believe that SJSU is not a well-managed university.  Only 53% of staff perceive that staff morale is good in their department but report (49%) that there is favoritism in their department.  The Working Conditions  Most staff (82%) believe that SJSU is a good place to work.  BUT some staff (40%) believe that SJSU is not a well-managed university.  Only 53% of staff perceive that staff morale is good in their department but report (49%) that there is favoritism in their department.

26 What The Staff Report  Compensation  Only 33% of staff indicate that they receive an equitable salary in their department or assigned work area.  Opportunities for Advancement and Career Development  Only a small % of the staff indicate that there are sufficient opportunities for advancement within their department (29%) and within SJSU (50%).  Compensation  Only 33% of staff indicate that they receive an equitable salary in their department or assigned work area.  Opportunities for Advancement and Career Development  Only a small % of the staff indicate that there are sufficient opportunities for advancement within their department (29%) and within SJSU (50%).

27 What The Staff Report  Perceptions of Supervisors  Staff have favorable views of their supervisors.  BUT, only 59% of staff feel that they can report wrongdoing by a supervisor or manager without fear of reprisal.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Only 58% of all staff are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have an SJSU’s campus climate.  Perceptions of Supervisors  Staff have favorable views of their supervisors.  BUT, only 59% of staff feel that they can report wrongdoing by a supervisor or manager without fear of reprisal.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Only 58% of all staff are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have an SJSU’s campus climate.

28 What The Staff Report  Qualitative Portion:  25% response rate (71)  Need higher salaries and compensation (28%; 20)  Management is incompetent, unfair, & unsupportive (25%; 18)  Campus climate as + (14%; 10)  Office politics as - (15%; 10)  Hostile work environment on daily basis (12%; 9)  Qualitative Portion:  25% response rate (71)  Need higher salaries and compensation (28%; 20)  Management is incompetent, unfair, & unsupportive (25%; 18)  Campus climate as + (14%; 10)  Office politics as - (15%; 10)  Hostile work environment on daily basis (12%; 9)

29 What The Staff Report  Qualitative Portion:  The number of years in job -- the more dissatisfaction with leadership ability/competence level of management  29% of all female respondents expressed personal experiences of discrimination in work departments  75% of all Mexican American respondents -- negative, lonely, unwelcoming climate  Qualitative Portion:  The number of years in job -- the more dissatisfaction with leadership ability/competence level of management  29% of all female respondents expressed personal experiences of discrimination in work departments  75% of all Mexican American respondents -- negative, lonely, unwelcoming climate

30 What The Staff Report  Qualitative Portion:  Word Matchups: 30% (21) described work environment as “unwelcoming,” “hostile,” and “harmful”  20% (14) linked management with the terms: “incompetent,” “unsupportive”  39% (27) detailed personal experiences or observations of discrimination by supervisor; accounts averaged 80 words in length.  Qualitative Portion:  Word Matchups: 30% (21) described work environment as “unwelcoming,” “hostile,” and “harmful”  20% (14) linked management with the terms: “incompetent,” “unsupportive”  39% (27) detailed personal experiences or observations of discrimination by supervisor; accounts averaged 80 words in length.

31 What The Administrators Report  99 administrators (53% response rate)  Demographics  38% male, 58% female  59% White, 6% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 9% Latino(a), 8% Black/African American  8% gay, lesbian, or bisexual  6% with a disability  99 administrators (53% response rate)  Demographics  38% male, 58% female  59% White, 6% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Islander, 9% Latino(a), 8% Black/African American  8% gay, lesbian, or bisexual  6% with a disability

32 What The Administrators Report  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Most administrators(71.5) have “somewhat” to “very” favorable perceptions of the campus climate at SJSU.  The majority of administrators do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of administrators report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.  Perceptions of the Campus Climate  Most administrators(71.5) have “somewhat” to “very” favorable perceptions of the campus climate at SJSU.  The majority of administrators do not personally experience discrimination at SJSU.  BUT several subgroups of administrators report “occasional” or “frequent” experience in discrimination.

33 What The Administrators Report  Job Satisfaction  The majority of administrators are satisfied with their jobs and with the various aspects of their jobs.  BUT those administrators with 1-10 years of tenure are less satisfied with some aspects of their jobs.  Campus Diversity  The majority of administrators (94%) know how to officially report any racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  The majority of administrators do not fear for their physical safety on campus because of their race/ethnicity/culture.  A subgroup of administrators express some discomfort.  Job Satisfaction  The majority of administrators are satisfied with their jobs and with the various aspects of their jobs.  BUT those administrators with 1-10 years of tenure are less satisfied with some aspects of their jobs.  Campus Diversity  The majority of administrators (94%) know how to officially report any racist, sexist, or other discriminatory behaviors.  The majority of administrators do not fear for their physical safety on campus because of their race/ethnicity/culture.  A subgroup of administrators express some discomfort.

34 What The Administrators Report  Most administrators (87%) value the work that SJSU is doing to celebrate diversity.  The Working Conditions  The majority (96%) feel that SJSU is a good place to work.  About 76% of administrators believe that SJSU is a well-managed university.  Only 65% of administrators and some ethnic minority administrators (i.e., Latino/a, African American) feel that the current ethnic composition of administrators at SJUS is adequate.  Most administrators (87%) value the work that SJSU is doing to celebrate diversity.  The Working Conditions  The majority (96%) feel that SJSU is a good place to work.  About 76% of administrators believe that SJSU is a well-managed university.  Only 65% of administrators and some ethnic minority administrators (i.e., Latino/a, African American) feel that the current ethnic composition of administrators at SJUS is adequate.

35 What The Administrators Report  Compensation  About 64% of administrators indicate that they are equitably compensated compared to other administrators at their level.  Opportunities for Advancement and Career Development  Many administrators (63%) indicate that there are sufficient opportunities for their advancement within the administration at SJSU.  Most administrators believe that women in their department have equal opportunities as men for advancement.  Compensation  About 64% of administrators indicate that they are equitably compensated compared to other administrators at their level.  Opportunities for Advancement and Career Development  Many administrators (63%) indicate that there are sufficient opportunities for their advancement within the administration at SJSU.  Most administrators believe that women in their department have equal opportunities as men for advancement.

36 What The Administrators Report  Perceptions of Staff  Most administrators have favorable views of their staff.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Only 67% of administrators are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have an SJSU’s campus climate.  Perceptions of Staff  Most administrators have favorable views of their staff.  Will the Survey Have an Impact?  Only 67% of administrators are at least somewhat optimistic about the impact that their responses on the survey will have an SJSU’s campus climate.

37 What The Administrators Report  Qualitative Portion:  30% response rate (29)  Need to improve communication between mgmt. levels (28%; 8)  Need more salary equity for staff (28%; 8)  Need more campus unity (17%; 5)  SJSU as + work environment (10%; 3)  Qualitative Portion:  30% response rate (29)  Need to improve communication between mgmt. levels (28%; 8)  Need more salary equity for staff (28%; 8)  Need more campus unity (17%; 5)  SJSU as + work environment (10%; 3)

38 What The Administrators Report  Qualitative Portion:  Female respondents expressed the need for more resources & opportunities than male respondents.  Qualitative Portion:  Female respondents expressed the need for more resources & opportunities than male respondents.

39 What The Administrators Report  Qualitative Portion:  Word Matchups: “Departments” and “teams” (18%)  “Hard to/difficult to” and “manage”  “Lead” not used in reference to teams, staff, or departments  Departments or units never referred to as “my”; in contrast to staff word matchups  Qualitative Portion:  Word Matchups: “Departments” and “teams” (18%)  “Hard to/difficult to” and “manage”  “Lead” not used in reference to teams, staff, or departments  Departments or units never referred to as “my”; in contrast to staff word matchups

40 Comparison of Groups

41

42

43 National Benchmarks/Indicators  CSU Campus Climate Reports (SFSU; CSUN; Cal Poly Pomona): In range; staff perceptions lower  UCLA: Higher across the board (faculty, student, staff)  University of Michigan: Lower in student ratings  CSU Campus Climate Reports (SFSU; CSUN; Cal Poly Pomona): In range; staff perceptions lower  UCLA: Higher across the board (faculty, student, staff)  University of Michigan: Lower in student ratings

44 What Does This Mean For Us?: Improving Our Campus Climate  Events and efforts toward “community building” and “perspective-sharing”  Engaging students: dialogue, perspective-taking, intercultural caring  Work on materialities (pay, rewards, professional development)  Managers -- Team building  Communication across units  Events and efforts toward “community building” and “perspective-sharing”  Engaging students: dialogue, perspective-taking, intercultural caring  Work on materialities (pay, rewards, professional development)  Managers -- Team building  Communication across units

45 What Does This Mean For Us?: Improving Our Campus Climate  Reach out to:  disabled students, staff, faculty  first-generation students, students of color  Latino/a, African American, Southeast Asian, Pacific Islander staff and faculty  Female staff and faculty  Engage ALL Campus Members; climate is “our’s”  Reach out to:  disabled students, staff, faculty  first-generation students, students of color  Latino/a, African American, Southeast Asian, Pacific Islander staff and faculty  Female staff and faculty  Engage ALL Campus Members; climate is “our’s”

46 Future Steps  Sharing the Data with Campus  Institutionalizing the Ongoing Collection of Campus Climate Data  Survey Instrument -- Every 2 years  Qualitative Focus Groups -- Every other year  Institutional Research  Student data to learning outcomes  Data --- Action (Program Development)  Need longitudinal research & contextual interviews  Sharing the Data with Campus  Institutionalizing the Ongoing Collection of Campus Climate Data  Survey Instrument -- Every 2 years  Qualitative Focus Groups -- Every other year  Institutional Research  Student data to learning outcomes  Data --- Action (Program Development)  Need longitudinal research & contextual interviews

47 Future Steps  The Rest Is Up To Us....  We Need To Work Together...  The Rest Is Up To Us....  We Need To Work Together...

48 For More Information  Go to: Institutional Research page on SJSU website  Contact Dr. Rona Halualani at 4- 1122  Go to: Institutional Research page on SJSU website  Contact Dr. Rona Halualani at 4- 1122


Download ppt "Examining Our Campus Climate at San Jose State University Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology Dr. Rona Halualani, Communication Studies Dr. Megumi Hosoda, Psychology."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google