1. Shielding options Jean Paul Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, UK ESA Study: WP2 24 th November 2006

2. Presentation TitleConference Name, Conference Date2 Solutions  A brief comparison materialShielding effectiveness (dB) Interference power (40 dB µ V reference) Carbon fibre12050 aluminium12050 Outer casing of a DB 25 to DB 9 cover -40-50 MULLE sensor (unshielded) -87

3. Presentation TitleConference Name, Conference Date3 Options  No global shielding method  Carbon expensive but light  Mesh structures with small holes  Best practice is to use Conductive box  D – type connectors