Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Collective motion of birds and locusts David J. T. Sumpter Department of Mathematics Uppsala University
9
Are there simple behavioural rules which explain all these very different outcomes?
10
How the two birds x and y change position:
13
β=1 β=0.98
14
Does distance between established routes explain these very different outcomes?
16
a c b C 2 C 1 C 4 C 3 W 1 W 2 W 3 W 5 W 6 W 4 G 5 G 2 G 12 G 6 G 7 G 9 G 8 G 3 G 1 G 11 G 10 G 4 Dominance Hierarchy
17
Proportion improvement in paired flight by singly more efficient bird Proportion improvement in paired flight by singly less efficient bird dcdc
20
1D self-propelled particles Position: Velocity: Czirok, Vicsek et al. (1999)
21
1D self-propelled particles Position: Velocity: Time SpaceTime Average direction
22
1D self-propelled particles Position: Velocity: Time SpaceTime Average direction
23
1D self-propelled particles Position: Velocity: Time SpaceTime Average direction
24
1D self-propelled particles Particle Density Average Direction
28
Model vs data
30
Collective vs individual motion 0 – 60 minutes 60 – 180 minutes Treatment Control
31
High density treatment
32
Control experiments
33
Alignment Activity (moving locusts)
34
Activity vs Alignment
35
Some conclusions Activity is the key parameter in predicting alignment in locusts. Degree of conflict is the key parameter in predicting compromise in pigeons. In both cases there is a sharp transition from one type of behaviour as this parameter is changed.
36
Collective Animal Behaviour www.collective-behavior.com
37
Collective Animal Behaviour www.collective-behavior.com
38
Collective Animal Behaviour www.collective-behavior.com
39
Collective Animal Behaviour www.collective-behavior.com
40
Collective Animal Behaviour www.collective-behavior.com
41
References Biro, D., Sumpter, D. J. T., Meade, J. & Guildford, T. (2006) From compromise to leadership in pigeon homing, Current Biology, 2006 16: 2123-2128. Buhl, J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Couzin, I. D., Hale, J. J., Despland, E., Miller, E. & Simpson, S. J. (2006) From disorder to order in locust marching, Science, 312, 1402 - 1406.. Yates, C., Erban, R., Escudero, C., Couzin, I. D.,Buhl, J., Kevrekedis, I., Maini, P. K., Sumpter, D. J. T. (2009) Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, almost accepted. Hale, J. J. (2008) Automated tracking of locusts and humans, DPhil thesis, University of Oxford. Sumpter, D. J. T., Krause, J. James, R., Couzin, I. D. and Ward A. J. W (2008) Consensus decision-making by fish, Current Biology, 18, 1773–1777. Ward, A. J. W., Sumpter, D. J. T., Couzin, I. D., Hart, P. J. B. and Krause, J. (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6948-6953. Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006) The principles of collective animal behaviour, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 361, 5-22. Webpage: http://www.math.uu.se/~david/web/
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.