1. Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot David Sills 1, Neil Taylor 2, Craig Smith 3, Geoff Strong 4 and John Hanesiak 5 1 Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON 2 Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab, Environment Canada, Edmonton, AB 3 Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, SK 4 University of Alberta (Adjunct), Edmonton, AB 5 University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB 2009 CMOS Congress 31 May – 4 June, Halifax, NS

2. Outline Mesonet Rationale Instrument details Observation Period and Methodology Data Status Preliminary Analysis –Fixed mesonet data –Mobile mesonet data Plans for Full Experiment Summary

3. Rationale Various severe weather studies have stressed the importance of mesoscale convergence boundaries and boundary-layer water vapour in thunderstorm development Such boundaries and boundary-layer processes cannot be adequately resolved using existing synoptic-scale surface and upper-air observation networks on the Canadian Prairies Surface mesonet with high spatial (~10 km) and temporal (2 s to 1 min) resolution need to resolve important boundary-layer processes important for convective initiation and severe storm development Mobile observations needed to measure gradients and fill holes in / across mesonet on an ‘as-needed’ basis

4. Observation Periods UNSTABLE Study Period Fixed mesonet stations and other selected fixed instrumentation from 1 June to 31 August Intensive Observation Period (IOP) 9-23 July 2008 Mobile platforms in full operation

5. Mesonet - Fixed Platforms 3 x EC/CRD FOPEX Stations 1 min T, T d, P, wind, pcpn 1 min FastT, FastT d, P, 10m wind, pcpn, deltaT, insolation FOPEX = Foothills Orographic Precipitation Experiment 5 x EC/MRD ATMOS Stations ATMOS = Automated Transportable Meteorological Observing System 1 min T, T d, P, wind, pcpn, insolation 3 x ‘full’ UofC FCA Stations FCA = Foothills Climate Array

6. Mesonet - Mobile Platforms UofA Mobile2 / EC Mobile3 2 sec T, T d, P, GPS 2 sec FastT, FastT d, P, GPS, Wind, Compass, Lightning EC/MRD AMMOS Stations AMMOS = Automated Mobile Meteorological Observing System

7. Mesonet 5 ATMOS stations installed to create two mesonet lines incorporating existing FOPEX and FCA stations High-density line with ~10-15 km spacing in region with highest frequency of CG lightning Med-density line with ~15-25 km spacing in region where dryline bulging can occur, storms can affect Calgary Allows testing of station placement and spacing Two lines used as anchor points for IOD mission measurement strategies Calgary Red Deer

8. Mobile Platform Transects Routes predeter- mined given limited road network Transects selected at beginning of day depending on the mission for that day Preference given for transects with mesonet stations

9. FC/URSD Data from selected fixed and mobile mesonet platforms were available in real- time to the field coordinator / UNSTABLE RSD Mesoanalyses were generated showing current satellite / radar imagery, positions of boundaries These assisted FC with positioning of mobile platforms

10. Data Status Have developed suite of interactive quality control programs via MATLAB All ATMOS station data have been QCd AMMOS data require more attention, QC is underway All photographs taken by the AMMOS teams have been QCd (time, location, direction, etc.)

11. Preliminary Analysis 1) Impact of mesonet stations 2) Characteristics of different boundaries as sampled by AMMOS

12. Operational Stations Only… Potential Temp (K)

13. With Mesonet Stations… Potential Temp (K)

14. Operational Stations Only… Mixing Ratio (g kg -1 )

15. With Mesonet Stations… Mixing Ratio (g kg -1 )

16. AMMOS Boundary Sampling July 9 th Dryline + Outflow Boundary

17. AMMOS Boundary Sampling July 9 th Dryline + Outflow Boundary Mixing ratio gradient = 16.0 g kg -1 km -1 Potential temp gradient = 1.4 K km -1 Boundary width = ~300 m 20 sec Moving E @ ~60 km/h

18. AMMOS Boundary Sampling July 13 th Dryline Boundary Mixing ratio gradient = 4.5 g kg -1 km -1 Potential temp gradient = 1.4 K km -1 Boundary width = ~700 m Moving NE @ ~50 km/h

19. AMMOS Boundary Sampling July 21st ‘Mystery’ Boundary Mixing ratio gradient = 5.4 g kg -1 km -1 Potential temp gradient = 0.65 K km -1 Boundary width = ~860 m Moving S @ ~40 km/h

20. Plans for Full Experiment (2012?) All 10 ATMOS stations (with cell or sat phone communication) 1-2 more AMMOS units for mobile met measurements Situational awareness software for mobile units and FC (SASSI / VORTEX2) Radar at centre of mesonet to detect radar fine lines at convergence zones

21. Summary Mesonet with both fixed and mobile platforms successfully deployed for 2008 pilot study Data QC and analysis are underway Preliminary indications that dryline gradient is stronger that previously thought Planning of mesonet for full UNSTABLE experiment has begun

22. Thank you / merci! D. Sills 2008