1. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview CM/GC Plan & Status Systems Description Cost Estimate Construction Schedule Risks and Challenges Summary

2. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Plan Why do we need a CMGC (Construction Manager & General Contractor) SLAC does not have the in-house expertise to independently manage a project of this magnitude

3. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Plan SOW for CM/GC has been developed and continues to have the highest priority in the CF group as largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS project Currently being reviewed by SLAC SO DOE Comments being updated as we speak Once approved by SLAC SO DOE, the plan is to submit to DOE Headquarters for approval (Chicago → DC) Once plan is approved, there will not be a need to go back for multiple review and approval of bid packages

4. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Plan – cont’d Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) has been written and continues to be updated as necessary (signed copy on LCLS website) Meeting planned Milestones are crucial! Advertisement placed in construction periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb

5. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Plan – cont’d CM/GC services will be solicited as firm-fixed price contracts Phase 1 – preconstruction services Phase 2 – construction services of underground and major excavation effort, and construction services of above ground buildings CM/GC Award 6/30/05 CM/GC qualifications – partial list Technical competence Similar previous experience Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors Financial strength

6. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Plan – cont’d Outstanding safety record Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <.81 EMR 1.0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that are considered average among their industry group EMR > 1.0 indicated that the company files more claims than other similar companies EMR<0.81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims than those compared against similar companies Injury frequency and severity rates Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnel OSHA citation history References from previous projects Evaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work practices LCLS has decided to place all contractors working on projects to have an EMR of <.81, go no-go

7. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CMGC P3 Schedule

8. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Phase 1 Effort Phase 1 – preconstruction activities to include: Provide effective overlap period and oversight of effort during Title II Estimates during Title II CPM Schedule Identify lead-time for critical items Design coordination Constructability reviews Value Engineering reviews Site investigation

9. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d Develop Project Management Plan (PMP) Construction Management Plan – outlines project scope, organization, and specific approach to accomplish project Project Safety Plan – project specific identifying job hazards, safety performance and individuals responsible for project safety Procurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and procedures for solicitation to subcontractors Quality Control and Assurance Plan – method of controlling time, cost and quality of various management tasks specific to the project

10. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d Develop construction bid packages Develop list and contact potential bidders Develop prequalification criteria Solicit bids Recommend award to SLAC for approval of subcontractor Award contract to subcontractors

11. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CM/GC Phase 2 Effort Phase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials, labor, and services required to construct the Project All general conditions including field personnel, office staff, temporary offices, temporary construction, safety implementation, construction equipment, coordination of all subs, project administration, construction waste management, commissioning

12. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Below Grade Plan Beam Transport Hall Undulator Hall Near Hall Far Hall XRTDT

13. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Beam Transport Hall – 227m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 300 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops Front End Enclosure – 30m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam Undulator Hall – 175m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment Electron Beam Dump – 40m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams New Facilities (below grade)

14. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 LCLS Site Plan Spear Pep Ring Road SLC SLC Tunnel Research Yard Pep Tunnel Survey Tower Beam Transport Hall Future Beam Lines NEH X-Ray Transport Beam Dump Front End Enclosure Office Complex Undulator Hall Future Office Space

15. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 IN RESEARCH YARD 227 M LONG 15’ x 14’-9” (W x H) 63 M HEADHOUSE 72” THICK WALLS 48” THICK CEILING 3 SERVICE AREAS ENDS IN HEADWALL HEADWALL LABYRINTH BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

16. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 BEAM TRANSPORT HALLUNDULATOR HALL UNDER HILL 175 M LONG 21’-11” x 14’-6” (W x H) 33 UNDULATORS HEAVY GRANITE SLABS MONOLITHIC FLOOR THERMAL BARRIERS

17. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 BEAM TRANSPORT HALLUNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP UNDER PEP RING RD. 40 M LONG 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H) CAST-IN-PLACE GROOVED FLOORS E-BEAM DIPS DOWN HEAVY METAL SHEILD

18. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 FRONT END ENCLOSURE EAST OF BEAM DUMP 29 M LONG BETWEEN SHEILDS 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H) CAST-IN-PLACE NUMEROUS EQUIP. BEAM TRANSPORT HALLUNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP

19. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALLFRONT END ENCLOSURE EAST OF FEE 39 M LONG 2 FLOORS 3 HUTCHES LASER BAY (ABOVE) CLOC FACILITY ABOVE PREP & CONTROL AREA FREIGHT ELEVATOR CUT & FILL TECHNIQUE BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP

20. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 FRONT END ENCLOSURE WITHIN NEH TOTAL 3 (CURRENT) ANOTHER 3 (FUTURE) 10 M x 10 M SHEILDING NEEDED HEAVY SLIDING DOOR NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL NEH HUTCHES BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP

21. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL FRONT END ENCLOSURENEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL EAST OF NEH 250 M LONG 18’ WIDE CONSTANT BEAM SPLITS IN THREE LABYRINTH TO FEH WALKWAY ALONG BEAM BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP

22. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALLFRONT END ENCLOSURENEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALLX-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL END OF X-RAY TUNNEL 29 M LONG 2 CAVERN/TUNNELS 31’ x 21’ (W x H) CONNECTING TUNNELS OFFICES IN EXTENDED CAVERN ACCESS TUNNEL BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP

23. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CLOC Floor Plans Headcount of CLOC Personnel = 284 Capacity of Conf Center = 150 Gross square footage of CLOC (offices and labs) = 68,800sf CLOC Exterior Elevations

24. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CLOC Exterior Elevations

25. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CLOC Exterior Elevations

26. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 CF FY Total Estimated Cost CMGC is responsible for ~$500K for Phase I (Award CMGC thru March 06) and $59.5M for Phase II (Mar 06 thru 08)

27. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 LCLS CF Construction Schedule Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces Site-work at NEH is key! Added additional time for CM/GC procurement phase: DOE approval and CM/GC subcontractor bidding phase

28. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Title-II Draft Schedule Interactive Planning session is scheduled for April 13,14 This is essentially JE 100% stage (6/05) CMGC has real value added input early during design phase

29. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Risks and Challenges Construction Safety All construction activities to comply with Federal and State environmental, safety, health and building codes Subcontractor activities In-house activities SLAC will approve construction safety program prior to start of construction Enhanced construction program is a must Special consideration is being addressed Tunnel construction RSY due to the congestion in the area

30. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Risks and Challenges – cont’d Bay area construction market Materials Labor Schedule concerns Annual lab shut-down periods Schedule for site characterization & remediation FFTB decommissioning On-site support

31. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Summary Confidence is high for the successful implementation of the model chosen as it has already been proved at LBNL Molecular Foundry CMGC holds the paper Actual cost will be determined by competitive bids from subcontractors Total estimated pricing established by SLAC

32. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 End of presentation

33. David Saenz CM/GC Overviewsaenzd@slac.stanford.edu April 8, 2005 Additional data All subcontractor bids and award of contracts will be pre-approved by SLAC Subcontractor bid award amounts added to CM/GC contract Technical Documents: CM/GC Statement of Work General Requirements (01010) Special Requirements (01210) Schedules (01325) Construction Waste Management (01570) Schedule of Performance Milestones