Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Case Analysis – Mkt 642

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Case Analysis – Mkt 642"— Presentation transcript:

1 Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Case Analysis – Mkt 642
Presented by: Michael Miyagishima Peter Atmali

2 Bronner Slosberg Humphrey
Founded in 1980 as Eastern Exclusives Distributing coupon books Early customers: American Express and AT&T Provides relationship marketing services Mission Statement: “Enable and assist clients to maximize the value of their customer base, and return on their customer base investments, across all points of contact”

3 Bronner Slosberg Humphrey
Small client roster 80-20 rule Strategic Interactive Group (SIG) Wholly owned separate entity Internet capabilities Ways to grow - add customers, add capabilities, both? Now known as Digitas

4 Eastern Exclusives Direct marketing
Bring companies together to create value American Express & local establishments AT&T & GE, American Air, JC Penney Measurements based on response rates Segmenting customers by value Profitable customers

5 Behavior Optimization
Behavior gap analysis Customer’s actual behavior Desired behavior Economic value of closing gap Focus on market communications Relied on database management & modeling, teleservices, and creative advertising

6 Customer Base Management
Evolved from Behavior Optimization Includes all sales and service interactions Client may have to undergo structural changes Example: FedEx

7 Bronner’s Contribution to FedEx
FedEx’s Problems Weak market Increased competition Stagnant growth Information overload Little understanding of customers FedEx’s Marketing Strategy Mass marketing – list rate structure Solution: Construct a more comprehensive database

8 Bronner’s Contribution to FedEx
What Bronner learned: Dual account Volumes & classes of service with other shippers Service requirements Who values on-time delivery vs. fast shipment Early delivery options Greater use of computers

9 Bronner’s Contribution to FedEx
Pilot test: different prices and services to some customers Segmenting the market Cost: less than $5 million ROI: $50 million in incremental revenue

10 Reducing Behavior Gap Assigning segment managers responsibilities
Implement customer base management procedure Learning from experience Placing high value on FedEx’s best customers Deepened customer loyalty

11 Would All Companies Benefit?
Segmenting and targeting customers is important to all companies Need to have resources available to implement this approach organizational support customer information Packaged or soft goods may be difficult

12 Would All Companies Benefit?
Need to have direct channels of communication direct mail Internet Teleservices Bronner needs international capabilities Conclusion: Not all companies would benefit

13 Wal-Mart Would Not Benefit
Bargain Efficient – Retail Link, no excess, no shortages Economies of Scale Speed 70% of its merchandise is rung up at the register before the company has paid for it Point: Suppliers are doing the behavior gap analysis

14 Wal-Mart Would Not Benefit
Mass Appeal 60% of ad budgets go to retailers for in-store promotions One-Stop Shop Economies of Scope Rotating Seasonal Items Most Product Categories Point: Market segmentation not crucial

15 Wal-Mart Would Not Benefit
MASS MARKETING DIRECT MARKETING Average customer Individual customer Customer anonymity Customer profile Standard product Customized market offering Mass production Customized production Mass distribution Individualized distribution Mass advertising Individualized message Mass promotion Individualized incentives One-way message Two-way messages Economies of Scale Economies of Scope Share of market Share of customer All customers Profitable customers Customer attraction Customer retention

16 Bronner’s Contribution to Coca-Cola - Background
1984 – Coca-Cola was losing market share Pepsi Challenge Studies on possible launch of “New Coke”

17 “New Coke” Findings Behavior Gap: Coca-Cola had a place in the heart, not refrigerator Consumers don’t mind line extensions Consumers were never told about “New Coke”

18 “New Coke” Blunder Coca-Cola executives wanted to make Coca-Cola #1
Even at the cost of Coke loyalists (11%) Lesson: Coca-Cola is more than a soft-drink icon Coca-Cola stood for traditional values

19 Bronner’s Contribution to Coca-Cola
Can Bronner come up with this conclusion using their methods? Customer Database Questionaires and Interviews Metaphors

20 Next Step Segment the market Target the market segments Coke loyalists
“Dual” drinkers Non-drinkers Target the market segments Trigger the love for the brand Line extensions Brand extensions

21 Questions?


Download ppt "Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Case Analysis – Mkt 642"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google