1. Automatic Facets: Faceted Navigation and Entity Extraction Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com

2. 2 Agenda  Introduction: Elements – Facets, Taxonomies, Software, People  3 Environments – E-Commerce, Enterprise, Internet  Design Issues – Facets and Entities  Conclusion – Integrated Solution

3. 3 KAPS Group: General  Knowledge Architecture Professional Services  Virtual Company: Network of consultants – 12-15  Partners – Inxight, FAST, etc.  Consulting, Strategy, Knowledge architecture audit  Taxonomies: Enterprise, Marketing, Insurance, etc.  Services: – Taxonomy development, consulting, customization – Technology Consulting – Search, CMS, Portals, etc. – Metadata standards and implementation – Knowledge Management: Collaboration, Expertise, e-learning – Applied Theory – Faceted taxonomies, complexity theory, natural categories

4. 4 Elements  Facet – orthogonal dimension of metadata  Entity / Noun Phrase – metadata value of a facet  Entity extraction – feeds facets, signature, ontologies  Taxonomy and categorization rules  Auto-categorization – aboutness, subject facets  People – tagging, evaluating tags, fine tune rules and taxonomy

5. 5 Essentials of Facets  Facets are not categories – Categories are what a document is about – limited number – Entities are contained within a document – any number  Facets are orthogonal – mutually exclusive – dimensions – An event is not a person is not a document is not a place.  Facets – variety – of units, of structure – Numerical range (price), Location – big to small – Alphabetical, Hierarchical – taxonomic  Facets are designed to be used in combination Wine where color = red, price = excessive, location = Calirfornia, And sentiment = snotty

6. 6 Advantages of Faceted Navigation  More intuitive – easy to guess what is behind each door Simplicity of internal organization 20 questions – we know and use  Dynamic selection of categories Allow multiple perspectives Ability to Handle Compound Subjects  Systematic Advantages – fewer elements – 4 facets of 10 nodes = 10,000 node taxonomy – Ability to Handle Compound Subjects  Flexible – can be combined with other navigation elements

7. 7 Essentials of Taxonomies Internal Organization  Formal Taxonomy – parent – child relationship – Is-A-Kind-Of ---- Animal – Mammal – Zebra – Partonomy – Is-A-Part-Of ---- US-California-Oakland  Browse Classification – cluster of related concepts – Food and Dining – Catering – Restaurants  Taxonomies deal with complex, not compound – Conceptual relationships – category membership – Contextual relationships – Computers & Software  Taxonomies deal with semantics & documents – Multiple meanings and purposes – Essential attributes of documents are not single value

8. 8 Developing Facets: Tools and Techniques Software Tools  Text Analytics – Taxonomy management, entity extraction, categorization, sentiment  Search – Integrated features, at index, Internet sources  CM – Enterprise environment, taggers and policy  Programmable Rules – Business and Subject matter expertise – Auto-populate variety of metadata – author, title, date, etc. – Relevance – best bets to weights and classes of documents  People – refine, monitor – it’s not automatic

9. 9 Developing Facets: Tools and Techniques Software Tools – Auto-categorization  Auto-categorization – Training sets – Bayesian, Vector Machine – Terms – literal strings, stemming, dictionary of related terms – Rules – simple – position in text (Title, body, url) – Advanced – saved search queries (full search syntax) – NEAR, SENTENCE, PARAGRAPH – Boolean – X NEAR Y and Not-Z  Advanced Features – Facts / ontologies /Semantic Web – RDF + – Sentiment Analysis – positive, negative, neutral

10. 10 Developing Facets: Tools and Techniques Software Tools – Entity Extraction  Dictionaries – variety of entities, coverage, specialty – Cost of update – service or in-house – Inxight – 50+ predefined entity types – Nstein – 800,000 people, 700,000 locations, 400,000 organizations  Rules – Capitalization, text – Mr., Inc. – Advanced – proximity and frequency of actions, associations – Need people to continually refine the rules  Entities and Categorization – Total number and pattern of entities = a type of aboutness of the document – Bar Code, Fingerprint

11. 11 Elements: People  Programmers, Librarians, Taxonomists, Metadata specialist – Integrate, design, develop rules, monitor activity & quality  Authors, Subject Matter Experts – Input into design (important facets), rules, activity meaning  Users – Web 2.0 – Feedback – quality and usability – Suggestions – missing terms, bad categorization & entity – Tags Clouds & folksonomy – for social networking features, not for information retrieval

12. 12 Three Environments  E-Commerce – Catalogs, small uniform collections of entities – Uniform behavior – buy this  Enterprise – More content, more types of content – Enterprise Tools – Search, ECM – Publishing Process – tagging, metadata standards  Internet – Wildly different amount and type of content, no taggers – General Purpose – Flickr, Yahoo – Vertical Portal – selected content, no taggers

13. 13 Three Environments: E-Commerce

14. 14 Three Environments: E-Commerce

15. 15 Enterprise Environment – When and how add metadata  Enterprise Content – different world than eCommerce – More Content, more kinds, more unstructured – Not a catalog to start – less metadata and structured content – Complexity -- not just content but variety of users and activities  Combination of human and automatic metadata – ECM – Software aided - suggestions, entities, ontologies  Enterprise – Question of Balance / strategy – More facets = more findability (up to a point) – Fewer facets = lower cost to tag documents  Issues – Not enough facets – Wrong set of facets – business not information – Ill-defined facets – too complex internal structure

16. 16 Facets and Taxonomies Enterprise Environment – Case One – Taxonomy, 7 facets  Taxonomy of Subjects / Disciplines: – Science > Marine Science > Marine microbiology > Marine toxins  Facets: – Organization > Division > Group – Clients > Federal > EPA – Instruments > Environmental Testing > Ocean Analysis > Vehicle – Facilities > Division > Location > Building X – Methods > Social > Population Study – Materials > Compounds > Chemicals – Content Type – Knowledge Asset > Proposals

17. 17 External Environment – Text Mining, Vertical Portals  Internet Content – Scale – impacts design and technology – speed of indexing – Limited control – Association of publishers to selection of content to none – Major subtypes – different rules – metadata and results  Complex queries and alerts – Terrorism taxonomy + geography + people + organizations  Text Mining – General or specific content and facets and categories – Dedicated tools or component of Portal – internal or external  Vertical Portal – Relatively homogenous content and users – General range of questions

18. 18 Internet Design  Subject Matter taxonomy – Business Topics – Finance > Currency > Exchange Rates  Facets – Location > Western World > United States – People – Alphabetical and/or Topical - Organization – Organization > Corporation > Car Manufacturing > Ford – Date – Absolute or range (1-1-01 to 1-1-08, last 30 days) – Publisher – Alphabetical and/or Topical – Organization – Content Type – list – newspapers, financial reports, etc.

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22 Integrated Facet Application Design Issues - General  What is the right combination of elements? – Faceted navigation, metadata, browse, search, categorized search results, file plan  What is the right balance of elements? – Dominant dimension or equal facets – Browse topics and filter by facet  When to combine search, topics, and facets? – Search first and then filter by topics / facet – Browse/facet front end with a search box

23. 23 Integrated Facet Application Design Issues - General  Homogeneity of Audience and Content  Model of the Domain – broad – How many facets do you need? – More facets and let users decide – Allow for customization – can’t define a single set  User Analysis – tasks, labeling, communities Issue – labels that people use to describe their business and label that they use to find information  Match the structure to domain and task – Users can understand different structures

24. 24 Automatic Facets – Special Issues  Scale requires more automated solutions – More sophisticated rules  Rules to find and populate existing metadata – Variety of types of existing metadata – Publisher, title, date – Multiple implementation Standards – Last Name, First / First Name, Last  Issue of disambiguation: – Same person, different name – Henry Ford, Mr. Ford, Henry X. Ford – Same word, different entity – Ford and Ford  Number of entities and thresholds per results set / document – Usability, audience needs  Relevance Ranking – number of entities, rank of facets

25. 25 Putting it all together – Infrastructure Solution  Facets, Taxonomies, Software, People  Combine formal power with ability to support multiple user perspectives  Facet System – interdependent, map of domain  Entity extraction – feeds facets, signatures, ontologies  Taxonomy & Auto-categorization – aboutness, subject  People – tagging, evaluating tags, fine tune rules and taxonomy  The future is the combination of simple facets with rich taxonomies with complex semantics / ontologies

26. Questions? Tom Reamy tomr@kapsgroup.com KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com