Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
IBS Tasks in the Bologna Process – A German Perspective 2 nd International Conference Education for All Warsaw, September 22-25, 2009
2
The clue I nformations- und B eratungs s telle Studium und Behinderung (IBS) des Deutschen Studentenwerks
3
1. IBS – Who are We? 2.The 18t h Social Survey 3.Changes – Challenges – Chances of the Bologna Process Contact Agenda 3
4
Project conducted by Deutsches Studentenwerk (DSW) Established in 1982 Fully financed by the Federal Ministry of Educatin and Research (BMBF) 1. IBS – Who are We? 44
5
a. Documentation and Information b. Counselling c. Platform and networking d. Trainings/Conferences IBS Tasks in General 55
6
T arget groups: people with disabilities who are considering to study and students with disabilities, organisations and institutions with counselling services T opics: How to organize a study? How to finance? Where to find counsellors? a. Documentation and Information 66
7
nationwide by e-mail or phone for counsellors/coordinators for students with disabilities for students and applicants: first and general information and guiding them to counsellors in the universities, in special cases. b. Counselling 77
8
Clearing house: to secure and widen equal opportunities in universities, politics and public administration to support counsellors/coordinators for pro-active work to cooperate with students with disabilities, their interest groups and our Advisory Board. c. Platform and Networking 88
9
Conferences for all interested in equal opportunities Seminars for coordinators and counsellors Trainings for application: for students and graduates d. Conferences/Seminars/Trainings: 9
10
*English short version: www.studentenwerke.de/se/2007/kurzfassung_engl.pdf www.studentenwerke.de/se/2007/kurzfassung_engl.pdf 2. The 18t h Social Survey * 2006 10
11
11
12
12 How many students feel impaired in their study? 8% of all students with health-related impairments = 143.000 students
13
3.Changes Challenges Chances of the Bologna-Process
14
14 Changes 16 Federal States and laws for higher education § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Federal Law
15
15 Growing autonomy of the Universities: - more rights to choose their students - create new study programmes - competition between universities - defining their own profile
16
16 What does this mean for students? less flexibility in BA and MA degrees less possibilities to organize their semesters following their personal needs reasonable adjustments have to be adapted to this study structure
17
17 Challenges How to secure equal opportunities? 14.367 degrees 394 universities
18
18 Accreditation procedures for new study programmes Criteria for accreditation: University governance and management Qualification objectives for concepts for study programmes Conceptual classfication for study programmes Study programmes concept Realisation Examination system Transarency and documentation
19
19 Criteria for accreditation Since 2008 the criteria reflect the issues of students with disabilities. IBS tasks: - counselling the accreditation agencies - working paper for the evaluators
20
20 Chances Accreditation process provides: - reasonable adjustments - transparency in information - qualified counselling draw attention for embedding studying and working with disabilities in higher education
21
21 Chances Recommendation “Eine Hochschule für Alle” of the 6 th Rectors Conference 2009 - a commitment to a University for All - agenda: 2010 discussion with all stakeholders 2013 evaluation
22
22 to support the coordinators for students with disabilities: - working papers - seminars - networking for collegial support IBS Tasks:
23
23 A University for All
24
Contact: Ursula Jonas Informations- und Beratungsstelle Studium und Behinderung (IBS) Deutsches Studentenwerk Monbijouplatz 11 D- 10178 Berlin Tel.: 0049/30/29 77 27 61 Fax: 0049/30/29 77 27 64 ursula.jonas@studentenwerke.de www.studentenwerke.de/behinderung
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.