0. This chapter has two main objectives
This chapter has two main objectives. First, to motivate the study of business cycles, the subject of the five chapters in Part IV. Second, to introduce the model of aggregate supply and demand, thus providing students with an overall context for what follows. Having this context will allow students to better understand the role played by each of the more detailed pieces of the model (Keynesian Cross, IS-LM, theories of short-run aggregate supply, etc) as students learn them in the following chapters.
This chapter is less difficult and a bit shorter than most other chapters in the text, and all of the concepts it introduces are all developed in more detail in the following chapters of Part IV. Therefore, you might consider spending a little less class time on this chapter than on other chapters in the book.
This chapter derives the AD curve from the Quantity Theory of Money, a simple theory that students learned in an earlier chapter; hence, this provides a simple and quick way of deriving an AD curve from theory. As a theory of aggregate demand, though, the Quantity Theory is very incomplete - it omits fiscal policy, interest rates, and net exports, among other things. But, this chapter merely aims to introduce the AD curve and the AD/AS model, and makes clear that the following three chapters will develop the theory of aggregate demand in greater detail.
Some professors, when teaching this chapter, merely present the downward-sloping AD curve rather than deriving it from the Quantity Theory. Although this approach is more ad hoc than deriving the AD curve from a theory, these professors offer the following arguments: First, most students have taken a macro principles course in which they were introduced to the AD curve, so they are likely to accept it even without a formal derivation from theory. (Indeed, deriving it from the Quantity Theory may seem at odds with what students learned in their principles course). Second, these professors believe that deriving the AD curve from the Quantity Theory requires students to learn things that they will have to “un-learn” in the following three chapters (such as the intuition for the AD curve’s negative slope). Finally, the ad-hoc approach saves class-time.
I think good arguments can be made for either position, and encourage you to do whatever you find most appropriate, effective, and comfortable for you and your students.

1. Chapter objectives difference between short run & long run
introduction to aggregate demand
aggregate supply in the short run & long run
see how model of aggregate supply and demand can be used to analyze short-run and long-run effects of “shocks”

2. Real GDP Growth in the U.S., 1960-2004
Average growth rate = 3.4%
NOTE: The growth rate here is calculated as the percentage change in real GDP over the previous quarter, multiplied by four to express as an annual rate. If you instead want to show your students a graph of the growth rate calculated as the percentage change in real GDP over 4 quarters earlier, then “hide” this slide and “unhide” the next one. I prefer this slide, because the recession of 2001 is easier to see here. However, quarterly growth rates are more volatile than annual ones, so you may prefer the less scattered look of the graph on the following slide to this one.
Point out the recessions, where GDP growth is negative for two or more quarters.
1974:2 through 1975:2
1980:2 through 1980:4
1982:1 through 1982:4
1991:1 through 1991:3
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis: Growth rate of real GDP (chained 1996 dollars)
Note: Recession dates may not precisely match official NBER recession dates, but data here do match that used in the text.

3. Real GDP Growth in the U.S., 1960-2004
Average growth rate = 3.4%
Point out the recessions, where GDP growth is negative for two or more quarters.
1974:2 through 1975:2
1980:2 through 1980:4
1982:1 through 1982:4
1991:1 through 1991:3
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis: Growth rate of real GDP (chained 1996 dollars)
Note: Recession dates may not precisely match official NBER recession dates, but data here do match that used in the text.

4. Time horizons Long run: all factors of production can adjust
Prices are flexible, respond to changes in supply or demand
Short run: some factors of production are fixed (i.e. capital K)
Many prices are “sticky” at some predetermined level
The material on this slide was introduced in Chapter 1. Since it’s been a while since your students read that chapter, it’s probably worth repeating at this point, especially since the behavior of prices is so critical for understanding short-run fluctuations.
It might also be worth reminding them that they (and most adults) are already aware of the concept of sticky prices. If they have a favorite beverage at Starbucks, ask if they can remember when its price was last increased. If they work, ask how long they go between wage changes. Sticky prices are a fact of everyday life, even if most adults have not heard the term “sticky prices” or studied the implications of sticky prices for short-run economic fluctuations.

5. The Quantity Equation as Agg. Demand
From Chapter 4, recall the quantity equation
M V = P Y
For given values of M and V, these equations imply an inverse relationship between P and Y:

6. The downward-sloping AD curve
An increase in the price level causes a fall in real money balances (M/P ),
causing a decrease in the demand for goods & services. AD Y P
The textbook explains different ways of thinking about the AD curve’s slope.
Here’s one that uses the idea of the simple money demand function introduced in chapter 4 (M/P = kY, where k = 1/V):
An increase in the price level causes a fall in real money balances, and therefore a fall in the demand for goods & services (because the demand for output is proportional to real money balances according to the simple money demand function that is implied by the quantity theory of money).
Here’s an explanation of the AD curve slope that doesn’t refer to the simple money demand function:
A fall in P reduces real money balances. In order to buy the same amount of stuff, velocity would have to increase. But, by definition, velocity is constant along the AD curve. For simplicity, suppose V = 1. With lower real money balances (or, equivalently, the same nominal balances but higher goods prices), people demand a smaller quantity of goods and services.

7. Shifting the AD curve
AD2
AD1 Y P
An increase in the money supply shifts the AD curve to the right.
For future reference (a bunch of slides later in this chapter), it will be useful to see how a change in M shifts the AD curve.
The tops of p.244 and 245 give some simple intuition for the shift. Here’s the idea: With velocity fixed, the quantity equation implies that PY is determined by M. An increase in M causes an increase in PY, which means higher Y for each value of P, or higher P for each value of Y.
Or: for a given value of P, an increase in M implies higher real money balances. In the simple money demand function associated with the Quantity Theory, the demand for real balances is proportional to the demand for output, so output must rise at each P in order for real money demand to rise and equal the new, higher supply of real balances M/P.
Or, if you like, just have your students take on faith that an increase in the money supply shifts the AD curve to the right for now, telling them that they will learn how this works in Chapters 10 and 11.

8. Aggregate Supply in the Long Run
In the long run, output is determined by factor supplies and technology
is the full-employment or natural level of output, the level of output at which the economy’s resources are fully employed.
Some textbooks also use the term “potential GDP” to mean the full-employment level of output.
“Full employment” means that unemployment equals its natural rate.

9. Natural Rate of Unemployment
Labor market does not clear due to:
Frictional unemployment (finding a job is a time consuming process, high flows of people who quit jobs, who search for new jobs) ~ 3% in US
Peculiarities of labor market (labor unions, unemployment benefits, labor market legislations)

10. The long-run aggregate supply curve
LRAS
The LRAS curve is vertical at the full-employment level of output.
Sometimes it takes students a little while to understand why the LRAS curve is vertical, when the supply curves they learned in their micro principles class were mostly upward-sloping.
Here’s an explanation that they might find helpful:
“P” on the vertical axis is the economy’s overall price level – the average price of EVERYTHING. A 10% increase in the price level means that, on average, EVERYTHING costs 10% more. Thus, a firm can get 10% more revenue for each unit it sells. But the firm also pays an average of 10% more in wages, prices of intermediate goods, advertising, and so on. Thus, the firm has no incentive to increase output.
Another thought: We learn from microeconomics that a firm’s supply depends on the RELATIVE price of its output. If all prices increase by 10%, then each firm’s relative price is the same as before, hence no incentive to alter output.

11. Long-run effects of an increase in M
AD2
AD1 Y P
LRAS
An increase in M shifts the AD curve to the right.
In the long run, this increases the price level… P2 P1
[The textbook does a fall in AD (Figure 9-5 on p.246); these slides do an increase.]
Notice that the results in this graph are exactly as we learned in chapters 3-8: a change in the money supply affects the price level, but not the quantity of output. Here, we are seeing these results on a graph with different variables on the axes (P and Y), but it’s the same model.
…but leaves output the same.

12. Aggregate Supply in the Short Run
In the real world, many prices are sticky in the short run.
For now (and throughout Chapters 9-12), we assume that all prices are stuck at a predetermined level in the short run…
…and that firms are willing to sell as much at that price level as their customers are willing to buy.
The assumption that all prices are fixed in the short run is extreme. Chapter 13 derives the SRAS curve under more realistic assumptions, and Chapter 19 (section 19-2) explores price stickiness in more detail. ke
Yet, the extreme assumption here is worth making.
The short-run response of output & employment to policies and shocks is the same (qualitatively) whether the SRAS curve is upward-sloping or horizontal. But the horizontal SRAS curve makes the analysis much simpler: a shift in AD leaves P unchanged in the short run. This greatly simplifies analysis in the IS-LM-AD model (chapters 10 and 11).
(With an upward-sloping SRAS curve, a shock to the IS and AD curves would change prices in the short run in addition to changing output. The change in prices would change the real money supply, which would shift the LM curve.)

13. The short run aggregate supply curve
The SRAS curve is horizontal:
The price level is fixed at a predetermined level, and firms sell as much as buyers demand.
SRAS

14. Short-run effects of an increase in M
AD2
AD1 Y P
In the short run when prices are sticky,…
…an increase in aggregate demand…
SRAS Y2
[The textbook (Figure 9-7 on p.248) does a decrease in AD, these slides do an increase.]
What about the unemployment rate? Remember from chapter 2: Okun’s law says that unemployment and output are negatively related. In the graph here, in order for firms to increase output, they require more workers. Employment rises, and the unemployment rate falls.
…causes output to rise. Y1

15. The SR & LR effects of M > 0
AD2
A = initial equilibrium
AD1 Y P
LRAS
B = new short-run eq’m after Fed increases M C P2
SRAS B A Y2
This slide puts together the pieces that have been developed over the previous slides: the short-run and long-run effects, as well as the adjustment of prices over time that causes the economy to move from the short-run equilibrium at point B to the long-run equilibrium at C.
The economy starts at point A; output and unemployment are at their “natural” rates. The Fed increases the money supply, shifting AD to the right. In the short run, prices are sticky, so output rises. The new short-run equilibrium is at point B in the graph.
In order for firms to increase output, they hire more workers, so unemployment falls below the natural rate of unemployment, putting upward pressure on wages. The high level of demand for goods & services at point B puts upward pressure on prices.
Over time, as prices become “unstuck,” they begin to rise in response to these pressures. The price level rises and the economy moves up its (new) AD curve, from point B toward point C.
This process stops when the economy gets to point C: output again equals the “natural rate of output,” and unemployment again equals the natural rate of unemployment, so there is no further pressure on prices to change.
C = long-run equilibrium

16. Stabilization Policy
Definition: policy actions aimed at reducing the severity of short-run economic fluctuations
i.e. Using monetary policy to combat the effects of adverse supply shocks
Shocks: exogenous changes in aggregate supply or demand. Shocks temporarily push the economy away from full-employment.
[The example in the textbook is an exogenous INCREASE in velocity.]
The exogenous decrease in velocity corresponds to an exogenous increase in demand for real money balances (relative to income & transactions). This might occur in response to a wave of credit card fraud, which presumably would make nervous consumers more inclined to use cash in their transactions. If there’s an exogenous increase in real money demand (i.e., an increase NOT caused by an increase in Y), then M/P must increase as well; if the Fed holds M constant, then P must fall. Thus, the increase in real money demand causes a decrease in the value of P associated with each Y, and the AD curve shifts down.
The velocity shock is the only AD shock we can analyze at this point, because (for this chapter only) we have derived the AD curve from the Quantity Theory of Money. However, if you have not derived the AD curve from the Quantity Theory, as discussed in the notes accompanying the title slide of this chapter, then you could pick any number of AD shocks: a stock market crash causes consumers to cut back on spending; a fall in business confidence causes a decrease in investment; a recession in a country with which we trade causes causes an exogenous decrease in their demand for our exports.

17. Aggregate Demand Shocks
Exogenous changes in velocity of money:
Invention and widespread use of ATMs
Increase velocity
Banking crisis
Reduce velocity

18. The effects of a negative demand shock
AD1
The shock shifts AD left, causing output and employment to fall in the short run Y P
AD2
LRAS
SRAS B A Y2
Over time, prices fall and the economy moves down its demand curve toward full-employment. C P2
Note the economy’s “self-correction” mechanism:
When in a recession, the economy --- left to its own devices --- “fixes” itself: the gradual adjustment of prices helps the economy recover from the shock and return to full employment.
Of course, before the economy has finished self-correcting, a period of low output and high unemployment is endured.

19. Supply shocks
A supply shock alters production costs, affects the prices that firms charge. (also called price shocks)
Examples of adverse supply shocks:
Bad weather reduces crop yields, pushing up food prices.
Workers unionize, negotiate wage increases.
New environmental regulations require firms to reduce emissions. Firms charge higher prices to help cover the costs of compliance.
(Favorable supply shocks lower costs and prices.)

20. CASE STUDY: The 1970s oil shocks
Early 1970s: OPEC coordinates a reduction in the supply of oil.
Oil prices rose 11% in % in % in 1975
Such sharp oil price increases are supply shocks because they significantly impact production costs and prices.
Oil is required to heat the factories in which goods are produced, and to fuel the trucks that transport the goods from the factories to the warehouses to Walmart stores. A sharp increase in the price of oil, therefore, has a substantial effect on production costs.

21. CASE STUDY: The 1970s oil shocksAD
The oil price shock shifts SRAS up, causing output and employment to fall. Y P
LRAS
SRAS2 B
In absence of further price shocks, prices will fall over time and economy moves back toward full employment. Y2
SRAS1 A A
And, as output falls from Ybar to Y2 in the graph, we would expect to see unemployment increase above the natural rate of unemployment. (Recall from chapter 2: Okun’s law says that output and unemployment are inversely related.)
Note the phrase “in absence of further price shocks.” As we will see shortly, just as the economy was recovering from the first big oil shock, a second one came along.

22. CASE STUDY: The 1970s oil shocks
Predicted effects of the oil price shock:
inflation 
output 
unemployment 
…and then a gradual recovery.
This slide first summarizes the model’s predictions from the preceding slide, and then presents data (from the text, p.253) that supports the model’s predictions.

23. CASE STUDY: The 1970s oil shocks
Late 1970s:
As economy was recovering, oil prices shot up again, causing another huge supply shock!!!
Data source: See p.254 of the textbook.
This second shock was associated with the revolution in Iran. The Shah, who maintained cordial relations with the West, was deposed. The new leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, was considerably less friendly toward the West. (He even forbade his citizens from listening to Western music.)

24. CASE STUDY: The 1980s oil shocks
1980s: A favorable supply shock-- a significant fall in oil prices.
As the model would predict, inflation and unemployment fell:
A few slides back, we did the analysis of an adverse supply shock. It might be worth noting that the predicted effects of a favorable supply shock are just the opposite: in the short run, the price level (or inflation rate) falls, output rises, and unemployment falls.
Looking at the graph: at first glance, it may seem that the fall in oil prices doesn’t occur until But remind students to look at the left-hand scale, on which 0 is in the middle, not at the bottom. Oil prices fell about 10% in 1982, and generally fell during most years between 1982 and 1986.

25. Stabilizing output with monetary policy
AD1 Y P
LRAS
The adverse supply shock moves the economy to point B.
SRAS2 B Y2
SRAS1 A

26. Stabilizing output with monetary policy
AD2
AD1
But the Fed accommodates the shock by raising agg. demand. Y P
LRAS
SRAS2 B C Y2 A
results: P is permanently higher, but Y remains at its full-employment level.
Note: If the Fed correctly anticipates the sign and magnitude of the shock, then the Fed can respond as the shock occurs rather than after, and the economy never would go to point B - it would go immediately to point C.

27. Chapter summary
1. Long run: prices are flexible, output and employment are always at their natural rates, and the classical theory applies.
Short run: prices are sticky, shocks can push output and employment away from their natural rates.
2. Aggregate demand and supply: a framework to analyze economic fluctuations

28. Chapter summary 3. The aggregate demand curve slopes downward.
4. The long-run aggregate supply curve is vertical, because output depends on technology and factor supplies, but not prices.
5. The short-run aggregate supply curve is horizontal, because prices are sticky at predetermined levels.

29. Chapter summary
6. Shocks to aggregate demand and supply cause fluctuations in GDP and employment in the short run.
7. The Fed can attempt to stabilize the economy with monetary policy.