1. Interactions Between Delayed Acks and Nagle’s Algorithm in HTTP and HTTPS: Problems and Solutions Arthur Goldberg Robert Buff New York University March 1999

2. 2 Client BrowserWeb Server TCP/IPApplication W1: write() less than MSS W2: write() less than MSS 175 ms (Win32) Ack delay Network 20 ms TCP segment with W1 TCP segment with W2 ACK for W1 Nagle - Delayed Ack Interaction TCP/IPApplication read() W1 read() W2 write() W1/W2 response read() W1/W2 response segment with response

3. 3 Observations Applies to request/response applications other than the Web Diagram to scale, and generous with message travel times Client blocks until receipt of response ACK delay depends on TCP implementation Occurs with client/server roles reversed, too

4. 4 Solution Opportunities: In Order of Increasing Implementation Difficulty and Impact Application: Change buffering, disable Nagle Sockets API: Broaden semantics TCP implementation: Decrease ACK delay TCP standard: Change Nagle

5. 5 Network Communications Goals Application layer: minimize median response time - deliver data to a receiver as soon as it’s ready Transport and Network layers: avoid gross inefficiencies - collect data into the largest possible segments

6. 6 Assumptions Network –modest delay –high bandwidth –minimal packet lost Application –client/server –many modules

7. 7 The Silly Window Syndrome (SWS) SenderReceiver TCP window full read 1 byte data ack Advertise 1 byte of available window 1 byte of data ack Advertise 1 byte of available window 1 byte of data Overhead: 3 packets and 3*40 = 120 bytes of TCP/IP headers transport 1 byte of data! write() some

8. 8 TCP’s SWS Avoidance Receiver –avoid advertising small TCP window advances –delay acknowledgements Sender –Nagle algorithm: delays transmission of partially filled segments until all previously transmitted data has been acknowledged

9. 9 Receiver SWS Avoidance in the TCP Spec, RFC 1122 The receiver's SWS avoidance algorithm determines when the right window edge may be advanced; –For realistic receive buffers (greater than twice the MSS) window advances are announced in increments of MSS. A TCP SHOULD implement a delayed ACK … the delay MUST be less than 0.5 seconds, and in a stream of full-sized segments there SHOULD be an ACK for at least every second segment.

10. 10 Sender SWS Avoidance in the TCP Spec A TCP SHOULD implement … [Nagle 84] to coalesce short segments. However, there MUST be a way for an application to disable the Nagle algorithm on an individual connection. The Nagle algorithm is …: If there is unacknowledged data … then the sending TCP buffers all user data … until the outstanding data has been acknowledged or until the TCP can send a full-sized segment …

11. 11 Test Application Execute 100 iterations

12. 12 Lab Machines connected by unloaded 100 Mbps Ethernet * Win95 separated by 1 router

13. 13 Linux/NT, Nagle Off

14. 14 NT/NT, Nagle On

15. 15 Solaris/NT, Nagle On

16. 16 Summary

17. 17 ACK delays

18. 18 HTTPS, new session key

19. 19 HTTPS, session key reused

20. 20 HTTPS Potential Savings

21. 21 HTTP, GIF from Netscape

22. 22 Application Alternatives

23. 23 Alternative: Disable Nagle on the last write of an application message Advantages –easy to do –removes delayed ACK from critical path –eliminate risk of small packets flood Disadvantages –two extra system calls per application message –possibly one extra IP packet –complicated for a programmer

24. 24 Related Work Nagle - delayed ACK interactions widely recognized, e.g. Stevens 98, Microsoft 98 and Sun 98 P-HTTP recorded by Heidemann 97 Nielsen 97, 98: test a typical HTTP/1.1 server page load –(Client ran on a DEC Alphastation 400 4/233, UNIX 4.0a)

25. 25 Possible Solutions Sockets API –Include a flush TCP implementation –Decrease ACK delay, especially in Win32 TCP standard –Desensitize SWS avoidance SWS avoidance clearly being triggered prematurely and introducing unnecessary delays

26. 26 Nagle modification proposed Minshall, “ A Suggested Modification to Nagle's Algorithm”, http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft- minshall-nagle-00.txt If a TCP has less than a full-sized packet to transmit, and if any previous less than full-sized packet has not yet been acknowledged, do not transmit a packet. Will not solve SSL problem above

27. 27 Todos Measure production delayed ACK costs Examine other application protocols Develop high-performance sockets

28. Interactions Between Delayed Acks and Nagle’s Algorithm in HTTP and HTTPS: Problems and Solutions Arthur Goldberg Robert Buff New York University March 1999