1. Construction Engineering Management 1 Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Department Partnering Health Index Developed by Oregon State University and Oregon Department of Transportation Research Team For full report, see: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP_ RES/docs/Reports/ImprovEffectPart nering.pdf

2. Construction Engineering Management 2 Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Department Strongly Disagree Neutral Strongly Agree 1. My partners are providing adequate information to execute the project. 12345 2. I believe that our partners are committed to the partnering agreement. 12345 3. Our partners our highly trustworthy.12345 4. Our activities with our partners are well-coordinated.12345 5. I believe that we are getting a raw deal.54321 6. Our partnering relationship is marked by a high degree of harmony. 12345 7. Given the opportunity, I would withdraw from the voluntary partnering agreement. 54321 COMPUTING YOUR PARTNERING HEALTH INDEX (PHI): Please circle the response that best represents your level of agreement with each statement. (Questions were reproduced from, or derived from, “Establishment of Critical Success Factors for Construction Partnering,” JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINERING, March/April 2000, by Eddie Cheng, Heng Li, and P.E.D. Love.) 1.Total the numbers of your circled responses and record in the box. 2.Average the scores for each team member surveyed. This is your project’s Partnering Health Index (PHI). 3.Each month, plot the average score on the “run chart” posted on the job trailer wall.

3. Construction Engineering Management 3 Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Department PHI Warning If PHI approaches 21 heading down, call for partnering assistance.