1. © The Aerospace Corporation 2011 AIM-1 Bill Lotko and Jim Clemmons The Aerospace Corporation 8 March 2011 SCIENCE GOAL Resolve Energetics, Sources and Couplings of Atmosphere-Plasma ESCAPE

2. SBU – Heliophysics Decadal Survey Internal Use Only AIM-1 (Atmosphere-Plasma Outflows) Determine how ionospheric outflows are energized, the processes controlling their fluxes and distributions, and how they affect the AIM system Plasma and energy sources  Coupling between thermosphere and ionospheric upflow, outflow  Conversion of EM energy to charged- particle energy  Altitude distribution of ion energization, outflow Observations/measurements –Electromagnetic and particle drivers –Thermal (3D), superthermal (2D) electron/ion phase-space densities –Local neutral gas density, composition, velocity (3D) –Auroral context from FUV images, plasma density sounding Field Instruments –Vector electric, magnetic fields: dc to 8 MHz (f pe ) –Langmuir probe – local electron density and temperature –Plasma density sounder – ionospheric density profiles Thermal Electron/Ion Spectrometers –Quasi-3D electron and ion velocity distributions – 0.1 to 20 eV Superthermal Electron/Ion Spectrometer –Energy-pitch angle distributions (e -, H +, He +, O + ) – 5 eV to 30 keV Wind Sensor – 3D neutral gas velocity Mass Spectrometer – neutral gas composition Ionization Gauge – neutral gas density FUV imager – 1356, LBH-S,L emissions Optimize orbits and s/c phasing for magnetic conjunctions in outflow regions –In cusp region, near nightside convection throat, auroral regions Connect low-altitude source regions with outflows observed near apogee –Ion dispersion mixes convective and field-aligned motions –O + transit time between s/c (> 1 minute) Differentiate ion energization processes –Stochastic, resonant, convective pick-up energization processes –Influence of neutral gas properties on outflow fluxes –Scale couplings: Meso/micro cavitation, upwelling, energization Mission Science Objectives Key Instrument Parameters 117 kg, 96 W, 510 kbps Key Challenges 2 2 identical s/c, 3-axis stabilized Launch mass: XXXX kg per s/c Launch date: Near solar maximum 2 Taurus 3110 launches 84  inclination, coplanar orbits –Maintain common line of apsides –Apogees 180  out of phase –Topside, bottomside phases 1.500 km  2500 km (1 yr) 2.200 km  2500 km (1 yr) 3. 275 km  2500 km (25-yr decay)

3. 3 e-mail address Department/subdivision name Top Risks and Challenges Dual-satellite mission –Early failure of one s/c or instrumentation would diminish scientific return –New types of single-point measurements would continue to provide novel scientific results, but lack of magnetically conjugate measurements would impede the goal of understanding connections between outflows observed at higher altitude and their generation in the ionosphere and coupling to thermospheric processes Dual-phase mission –Resolving both bottomside and topside processes contributing to outflow requires 2 mission phases: Diminished scientific return if one s/c or instrumentation fails prior to 2 nd phase –Topside (phase 1) measurements in the energization region are a higher priority in understanding outflow processes Possible interference issues between soundings and other measurements Radiation exposure may limit instrument performance during an extended mission

4. 4 e-mail address Department/subdivision name Unique Investments and Technologies First topside sounder since ISIS-2 (1971) Two-point in-situ measurements along a single magnetic flux tube FUV images with 7 km auroral resolution,10 sec/frame, 900 km FOV Leverages Heliophysics System Observatory with in-situ measurements and images in a critical region of geospace No new technologies are required, but the science would benefit from instrument developments in measuring low-density neutral gas properties near mission apogee (e.g., neutral polar wind) Measurements of the ionospheric plasma den- sity profile, combined with SOA measurements of EM fields, charged particles, neutral gas and auroral emissions, provide unique opportunities to determine how ionospheric structure controls and is influenced by ionospheric outflows.

5. 5 e-mail address Department/subdivision name Operational Strategy Minimal delay between launches and commissioning of 2 s/c Nominal 2 year mission in 2 phases –Topside: 500 km x 2500 km (1 year) –Bottomside: 200 km x 2500 km (1 year) –EOL orbit at 275 km x 2500 km would allow a useful extended mission and critical observations for the Heliophysics System Observatory Orbit maintenance –Maintain coplanarity of orbits and common line of apsides –Orbital phase to maximize measurements in primary outflow regions (cusp, auroral) during magnetic conjunctions Burst-mode data acquisition would be desirable for campaigns, e.g. coordination with ground-based instruments and intervals of active management of magnetic conjunctions Choice of perigee may depend on solar-cycle phase at launch

6. 6 e-mail address Department/subdivision name PackageInstrumentMeasured ParametersHeritage Fields Double probeVector E, dE DE-2, San Marco, Polar, C/NOFS MagnetometerVector B, dB DMSP, MGS, ACE, NEAR, WIND, STEREO, CHAMP Langmuir probePlasma density, temperature FAST, C/NOFS, MAVEN Plasma Thermal electron/ion spectrometers Electron, ion distributions 0.1 eV – 20 eV Freja, SCIFER, DE, JOULE, Polar, Akebono, GEODESIC, SWARM Superthermal electron/ ion spectrometer Electron, H +, He +, He ++, O + distributions 5 eV – 30 keV RBSP, MMS, JUNO, ROSETTA Gas Ionization gaugeNeutral density AE, Streak Wind sensorVector winds C/NOFS Mass spectrometerIon, neutral composition OGO, AE, PVI, Cassini Remote FUV imager 1356, LBH-S, LBH-L Images of auroral Q, E 0 ; O/N 2 ; TEC IMAGE, FORMOSAT-2 Ionospheric sounderElectron density profile Alouette, ISIS, IMAGE Instrument Heritage and Analogies

7. 7 e-mail address Department/subdivision name Spacecraft Heritage and Analogies Placeholder –Placeholder

8. 8 e-mail address Department/subdivision name Schedule Matrix Placeholder –Placeholder

9. SBU - Astro2010 Internal Use Only Mission Name - Cost Analogies 9 Analogies PM/SE/MAInstrumentSpacecraftMOS/GDSPhase E Mission 1 XXX Mission 2 X Mission 3 XX Mission 4 XX Mission 5 XXX Mission 6 XX Mission 7 X Mission 8 XXXXX Mission 9 X

10. 10 e-mail address Department/subdivision name Cost Box – Summary Chart Placeholder –Placeholder