Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
FPS Social Security DG Strategy & Research Performance agreements in the Belgian social security network July 2009
2
Page 2 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Context Performance agreements (PA) in the Federal state of Belgium 1
3
Page 3 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Governance framework at the federal level Executive bodies : Federal Law of 16 March 1954 on the control on public institutions of general interest A A B B C C D D 1993 : Autonomous State’s owned enterprises / public anonymous corporation (PA) 1997-2003 : Public institutions from social security PA, ops autonomy, ind responsibility for CEO 1997-2003 : Public institutions from social security PA, ops autonomy, ind responsibility for CEO ’90 : privatization Central ministries 1999-2003 : Copernicus Reform Matrix structure, reorganisation in Federal Public services (FPS) 1999-2003 : Copernicus Reform Matrix structure, reorganisation in Federal Public services (FPS) 1 1 2 2 2008 : Policy plan Minister for Civil Service PA / operational autonomy for FPS and remaining A & B bodies To ex post control 2008 : Policy plan Minister for Civil Service PA / operational autonomy for FPS and remaining A & B bodies To ex post control 3 3 4 4 2001-2003 Individual responsibility for CEO’s 2001-2003 Individual responsibility for CEO’s
4
Page 4 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Governance framework within the Regions and Communities Executive bodies : Federal Law of 16 March 1954 for the control on public institutions of general interest A A B B C C 1993 : Autonomous State’s owned enterprises / public anonymous corporation (PA) General ministries Brussels Capital Region Within & unchanged Wallon Region French Community Wallon Region French Community Within & developed 2004 : Management decrees for executive institutions : control, PA, CEO responsibility 2004 : Management decrees for executive institutions : control, PA, CEO responsibility 2007 : Plan Marcourt (Walloon Region) reorganisation in departments, CEO-mandate Flemish Community Outside 2000-2008 : For a Better Management Policy Reform Reorganisation in policy fields, agencies, CEO-mandate, PA for agencies 2000-2008 : For a Better Management Policy Reform Reorganisation in policy fields, agencies, CEO-mandate, PA for agencies 2007 : PA for departments
5
Page 5 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Performance agreements in the Kingdom of Belgium Flemish Community 56 executive agencies 13 central departments Flemish Community 56 executive agencies 13 central departments Walloon Region 27 executive bodies or public enterprises Walloon Region 27 executive bodies or public enterprises French Community 6 executive bodies or public enterprises French Community 6 executive bodies or public enterprises Brussels Capital Region 5 executive bodies or public enterprises Brussels Capital Region 5 executive bodies or public enterprises Federal authority 11 State’s owned enterprises 15 executive institutions from social security Federal authority 11 State’s owned enterprises 15 executive institutions from social security
6
Page 6 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Contractmanagement within the Belgian Social Security network 2 Actual situation Contracting parties Options taken in the implementation of the PA
7
Page 7 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Performance agreements within the Belgian social security network Performance agreements in 15 Social Security Public Institutions (SSPI) : Between the Federal State and each SSPI 12.000 employees concerned Operational budget +/- 1billions €/year Three years period + prolongation 1ste generation (2002-2005) – second generation (2006- 2009) Performance agreements in 15 Social Security Public Institutions (SSPI) : Between the Federal State and each SSPI 12.000 employees concerned Operational budget +/- 1billions €/year Three years period + prolongation 1ste generation (2002-2005) – second generation (2006- 2009) Why ? Need for a well performing social security network because of external threats Greater demands from citizen for a qualitative service More and more budgetary constraints Need for adequate policy support
8
Page 8 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Who ? A PA between Social partners, CEO & Ministers Belgian State System of public social insurance covering social risks Direct contributions Employers’ organisations Trade unions Governance of the public institutions Performance agreements Appointed CEO
9
Page 9 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be The contracting pandemonium Ministre de Tuelle Commissionar Policy Minister Commissionar Policy Minister Support to the political level Control, following-up concertation Support Minister for Budget Commissionar Minister for Budget Support to the political level Control, following-up concertation Support FPS Budget Concertation en task division Intercabinet working groups Minister for Civil Service Social Security Public Institution Belgian government FPS Empl FPS Soc Ministre de Tuelle Policy Minister Mgt-board CEO Social Security Public Institution Mgt-board CEO Social Security Public Institution Mgt-board CEO Social Security Public Institution Mgt-board CEO Social Security Public Institution Mgt-board CEO SSPI’s College
10
Page 10 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Content : the PA will cover the operational performance of the institutions Effectiveness : policy implementation Efficiency : Value for Money Performance : execution daily activities
11
Page 11 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Output objectives
12
Page 12 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Fraud & Error inside the PA High topic for the 3d generation (2010-2012) Policy targets for tackling fraud & error (april 2009) Policy targets for tackling fraud & error (april 2009) Not only fraud but also errors Analyzing actual measurement system en developing new ones if necessary Report on fraud/error mechanisms inside your policy sector Making a risk analyse for your policy sector Updating the actual action plans against social fraud / error Cooperating with others Belgian departments or executive bodies Participating to the execution of international / bilateral agreements
13
Page 13 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be A new relationship between Agency and the State L’Etat, c’est moi We are equal partners Performance agreements Primacy of politics Reaching a compromise Operational autonomy Contractual obligations Reporting Remaining control
14
Page 14 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be The contractualisation process in brief 3 Negotiation Yearly implementation cycle First evaluation
15
Page 15 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Negotiation process Step 4 – Political discussions Step 6 Step 5 : 2 nd round of negotiation Step 2 – 1st round of negotiation Step 3 Step 1 Preparation Budgetary planning Year X Budget 1 st year – Budgets 2 next Years 2 nd project contract Quality check-up Final approval of the budgets Meeting Inst – Policy Minister Approbation, signing & publication Quality check-up Financial way Strategic way Technical way PreparationNegotiationConclusion Quality check-up Approval Social Pertners Meeting Inst – Policy & Budget Ministers Meeting Institution – Policy Minister GOV decision Meeting Inst – Policy & Budget Ministers Meeting Inst-Policy Minister 3d project contract State’s expectations 1st project PA Communication to Policy Ministers June X-1June-July X-1August – October X-1 November-december X-1 Political / budgetary discussions
16
Page 16 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Implementation : yearly cycle Mgt plan 6 month report Year report Report State’s commissioners Year discussion Adaptation Year Cycle Global & pluriannual evaluation by dpt Negociation of new agreements Pluriannual Cycle
17
Page 17 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Evaluation 1st generation : goal attainment 1193 (I) /1204 (II) operational outputs 978 (I) /1136 (II) SMART enough to be evaluated 1193 (I) /1204 (II) operational outputs 978 (I) /1136 (II) SMART enough to be evaluated
18
Page 18 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Weak points of PA Observed problems with the information quality inside PA and reports
19
Page 19 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Open questions about the system’s future 4
20
Page 20 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be First question : how to maintain the innovative nature of PA ? Effectiveness : policy implementation Efficiency : Value for Money Performance : execution daily activities
21
Page 21 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Second question : how to match the pluri-annual PA with yearly budgetary constraints ? Respect for the (yearly) techniques of budgetary orthodoxy Preaching for pluri- annual performance en budget planning
22
Page 22 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Third question : how to guarantee the partnership and the primacy of politics at the same time? Changes in policy / political / budgetary cycles L’Etat, c’est moi
23
Page 23 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Fourth question : how to translate PA into individual performance ? Organizational performances Individual targets
24
Page 24 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be Fifth question : How to transfer the system to central departments ? Covering production chain Covering study & policy departments
25
Page 25 dgstrat@minsoc.fed.be For further informations Amaury Legrain Tom Auwers FPS Social Security – DGStrat amaury.legrain@minsoc.fed.be tom.auwers@minsoc.fed.be http://www.socialsecurity.fgov.be
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.