Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Natural Categories Hierarchical organization of categories –Superordinate (e.g., furniture) –Basic-level (e.g., chair) –Subordinate (e.g., armchair) Rosch.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Natural Categories Hierarchical organization of categories –Superordinate (e.g., furniture) –Basic-level (e.g., chair) –Subordinate (e.g., armchair) Rosch."— Presentation transcript:

1 Natural Categories Hierarchical organization of categories –Superordinate (e.g., furniture) –Basic-level (e.g., chair) –Subordinate (e.g., armchair) Rosch et al. (1976) –Basic level category is most important Categories very different from eachother We learn basic-level categories first Used in everyday language (see Table 8.2 – basic level names are simple, shorter)

2 Goal-derived categories Members of a category serve a function –Birthday presents Members organized around a principle –Principle – to make someone happy on their birthday Unlike natural categories, –Typicality is NOT determined by family resemblance (Barsalou, 1985)

3 Models of categorization Prototype model: abstract representations that match any member of a category (e.g., prototypical dog) Feature frequency model: place objects into categories based on how many shared attributes (features) Exemplar model: store specific members of a category in memory; compare new items to all members of a category

4 More models of categorization Prototype model has good economy of storage  conceptual advantage to this model Reed (1972) + Reed & Friedman (1973) Used fake (schematic, line drawings) faces (p. 241) Taught Ss categories of faces Then, Ss classify new faces into one of the two categories

5 results Majority of classifications were based on the prototype model –In other words, people use prototypes to classify new information and place it into existing categories

6 Why categories? Categories organize material –Make material easier to find –Make material faster to find –Help you learn new material faster Semantic = meaning –Semantic organization

7 Collins and Quillian (1969) model Aka, semantic network model Aka, hiearchical network model “network” – individual memories are connected to each other (networking) in such a way that allows for efficient mental functioning

8 example (Fig. 9.5) (p. 261) animals Birds canaries

9 animals birds canaries Have wings feathers beak yellow sing breathe eat reproduce “node” “properties” “is a subset” “IS-A” link

10 Sentence verification task Given a sentence –E.g., All canaries are birds. Yes/no rapid response –Main measure is RT To be able to say “yes” –People find a “path” in the network that connects the two concepts in the sentence appropriately

11 experiment All canaries are birds. Vs. All canaries are animals. C&Q Model predicts : animals slower than birds because animals takes one extra link to check (to verify) the sentence

12 Semantic distance effect Results: the more “links” that need to be traversed to verify that two concepts are related, the longer the RT (look on p. 263 graph) Supports the C&Q Model (semantic network)


Download ppt "Natural Categories Hierarchical organization of categories –Superordinate (e.g., furniture) –Basic-level (e.g., chair) –Subordinate (e.g., armchair) Rosch."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google