1. SiD and the Next Steps for ILC Detectors SLAC DOE Program Review June 12, 2007 John Jaros

2. A Lot is Happening in the ILC Detector World Real Progress on the Machine: Reference Design Report (RDR) and Cost were unveiled in February. Pressure on the detectors: International Linear Collider Steering Committee charged the Detector Community to Propose a Detector Roadmap, to put ILC Detectors on the same timeline as the Machine. Preparing the ILC Case: A draft Detector Concept Report (DCR), the companion document to the RDR which makes the case for ILC physics and detectors, was released in May. The RDR and DCR justify moving to the next step, engineering designs for machine and detector. Next Steps: Plans for the Machine Engineering Design Report and first steps for the Detector Roadmap were announced at the LCWS last week.

3. DCR: The Case for ILC Physics and Detectors http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php?id=dcrdet:dcrdet_home

4. Global Design Effort GDE Machine Roadmap 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Global Design EffortProject Baseline configuration Reference Design ILC R&D Program Engineering Design Expression of Interest to Host International Mgmt LHC Physics

5. Shin-ichi Kurokawa, ILCSC Chair Albrecht Wagner, ICFA Chair Subject: Letter to WWS Co-Chairs 26 February 2007 To: Co-Chairs of the WWS International Organizing Committee From: ILCSC The realization of the International Linear Collider has taken major steps forward in recent years. This could not have happened without the leadership taken coherently by the particle physics community, within the framework of ICFA. Unprecedented collaborative steps have been necessary, and the community has adapted successfully to what, in some regions, required major redirections of traditional accelerator R&D effort. Two major milestones, the selection of the main-linac RF technology and the GDE’s announcement of the RDR budget and associated design choices, keep the GDE on pace to complete a construction-ready engineering design for the ILC accelerator-complex by 2010. Maintaining this momentum requires also that the equivalent strategic decisions and the level of technical maturity for the two ILC detector proposals keep pace with the accelerator schedule. Major progress in this regard is ongoing under the auspices of WWS. In addition, a definite plan together with milestones is needed to have detector designs of a maturity similar to that of the accelerator by 2010. This needs an enhanced effort by the community. ILCSC will support the formation of an International Detector Advisory Group to assist this effort. ICFA looks forward to receiving such a plan from WWS at the June 1, 2007 ILCSC meeting at DESY.

6. The Roadmap, as proposed by WWS The key elements of the roadmap proposal are: A call for LOIs by ILCSC this summer, due summer 2008 These LOIs will provide a description of the proposed detector and its performance, and will note the intent of those planning to collaborate on developing the EDR. LOIs will be reviewed by the IDAG, an International Detector Advisory Group of experts chosen by ILCSC. IDAG will facilitate the definition of two, complementary and contrasting detector designs, and report the result to ILCSC. The result of this process should be two proto-collaborations operating by the beginning of 2009 to produce EDR documents by end 2010. … and begun by the ILCSC Issue Call for Detector LOIs summer 2007. Search for, and appoint a Research Director, to oversee the experimental program for the ILC, coordinate reviews of the LOIs, facilitate the selection of two, complementary detector designs, help generate support for the two detector EDRs, and monitor EDR development. …

7. Calling for LOIs signals a Phase Change for the Detector Concepts. Detector “Design Studies” are becoming “Detector Collaborations.” Calling for LOIs also sends signals to the ILC Detector R&D Community. Now’s the time to align with a detector concept, participate in the optimization process, and contribute to the LOIs. Four goes to Two. The four ILC detector concepts, plus any that emerge within the next year, must eventually contract to two, suitable for full engineering design. Spontaneous Coalescence (e.g., LDC and GLD) Induced Coalescence? Shotgun Marriage? Roadmap Implications

8. ILC Detector Concepts SiDLDCGLD Solenoid Designs B=5,4,3 Tesla Si vs TPC Tracking “Particle Flow” Calorimeters 4th Dual Solenoid Compensating Cal TPC Tracking

9. SLAC’s Role in ILC Detector Development Co-Leads the SiD Design Study Provides Computing-Simulation- Analysis infrastructure for the US ILC Detector Effort Optimizes SiD Design and Benchmarks SiD performance Pursues detector R&D, especially Si/W Calorimetry, Readout electronics, and Si Tracking Designs and studies the Machine- Detector interface and IP Instrumentation.

10. Silicon Detector Design Study Goals: Design an ILC detector, aggressive in performance, constrained in cost, identify and develop needed detector R&D, and engage an international community of physicists interested in the ILC.

11. SiD Collaborators Design Study Leadership is International Fermilab, Argonne, Brookhaven, SLAC, Annecy, U Tokyo, U Oregon, U T Arlington, NIU, Brown, U Wisconsin, Oxford, KEK Design Study Participants from many Institutions U Washington, RAL, LLNL, IHEP Beijing, Kyungpook U, Princeton, MIT, UCSC, UC Davis, U Iowa, U Colorado, Kansas State, U Chicago, U Michigan, Notre Dame, Yale, U New Mexico, Purdue Close R&D Collaborations with several Institutions Fermilab, U Oregon, UC Davis, Brown, Oxford, UCSC, NIU, Argonne,… 130 Authors for SiD DOD

12. Collaboration Workshops SiD Workshop at SLAC October 26-28, 2006 http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/Workshop06.asp SiD Workshop at Fermilab April 9-11, 2007 http://ilc.fnal.gov/detector/rd/sid/sid07.htmhttp://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/Workshop06.asp http://ilc.fnal.gov/detector/rd/sid/sid07.htm R&D Reviews Microstrip Sensor Design Review (SLAC) Dec 14, 2006 WWS Tracking Review (Beijing) Feb 5-8, 2007 WWS Calorimeter Review (DESY) May 31-Jun 4, 2007 Weekly Meetings Benchmarking, Reconstruction, Calorimetry, Tracking/Vertexing see SiD Webpage: http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/default.asp http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/default.asp SiD Documents Detector Outline Document http://hep.uchicago.edu/~oreglia/siddod.pdf SiD Tracking R&D Report http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/Documents/Tracking_review.pdf SiD Calorimetry R&D Report http://www- hep.uta.edu/~white/SiD_Cal_Review07/SiD_Calorimeter_RD_Review_Report_Final.doc http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/Documents/Tracking_review.pdf http://www- hep.uta.edu/~white/SiD_Cal_Review07/SiD_Calorimeter_RD_Review_Report_Final.doc SiD Activities

13. Jet energy resolution goal is  E/E=3-4% to distinguish hadronic decays of W’s and Z’s. Particle Flow Calorimetry requires a dense, highly segmented, SiW Ecal and Hcal. Constrain the cost of calorimeters and solenoid by limiting the radius; boost B to maintain BR 2. B = 5 Tesla Si strip tracker exploits high B and gives excellent momentum resolution and robust performance.  p t /p t 2 ≤ 5 x 10 -5 GeV -1 VX Tracker exploits high B to sit at minimum possible radius with max Ω  = 5  10/psin 3/2   m SiD Design Rationale

14. SiD Starting Point Vertex detector: 5 barrels, 4 disks; R in = 1.4 cm Si tracking: 5 layers; R in = 20 cm HCAL Fe: 34 layers; R in = 138 cm Solenoid: 5 T; R in = 250 cm EMCAL Si/W: 30 layers R in = 125 cm Flux return/muon R in = 333 cm R out = 645 cm

15. SiD @ SLAC: Simulation/Reconstruction Provides full detector simulation in Geant4. Runtime detector description in XML, making it easy to study design variations. Provides Java-based reconstruction & analysis framework Developing Tracking and Calorimeter reconstruction code Supports SiD, ALCPG, and international simulation effort with Tutorials, Workshops, WWS Working Groups Provides physics simulation and data samples for physics analysis e.g. 1 ab-1 sample of all SM Processes at 500 GeV http://www.lcsim.org/datasets/ftp.htmlhttp://www.lcsim.org/datasets/ftp.html SLAC Sim/Recon Group Ron Cassel Norman Graf* Tony Johnson Jeremy McCormick See Norman’s Talk in Breakout Sessions

16. Understanding Physics Requirements on Calorimetry Need clean identification of W’s, Z’s, H’s, tops, so dijet mass resolution  few GeV. How Important is Jet Energy Resolution? e.g. Triple Higgs Coupling Optimization and Benchmarking Requiring dM/M   Z /M Z = 2.5/92 = 2.7 %, sets dE jet /E jet ~ 3- 4%  E/  E Tim Barklow SLAC Group Tim Barklow Ron Cassell Norman Graf John Jaros

17. Particle Flow Calorimetry Promises Improved Dijet Mass Resolution 1 Measure the energy of every particle, not the energy deposited in calorimeter modules. Tracker measures charged particles, ECal measures photons, Hcal measures neutral hadrons. High transverse and longitudinal segmentation is needed to distinguish individual particles and avoid confusion.

18. Silicon Tungsten Ecal 13 mm 2 pixels Readout 1k pixels per si sensor (KPiX) Low Power  Passive Cooling SLAC Effort Breidenbach Freytag Graf Herbst Haller Nelson + BNL, U Oregon, UC Davis

19. Integrated Electronics Preserves R Moliere Kapton Cables (UC Davis) Pixel Sensor with KPiX (U Oregon) 1 mm readout gap  13 mm effective Moliere radius. Very compact showers. Mechanical Design (SLAC/Oregon/Annecy)

20. KPiX Readout Chip One cell. Dual range, time measuring, 13 bit, quad buffered 2 x 32 Prototype #4 now being tested at SLAC. #5 is on the way. Full chip in the fall. Use for ecal and µstrips; adapt for hcal. Noise in KPiX-4 Demonstrated Performance Single MIP tagging (S/N = 8) Dynamic range 0.1 –2500 MIPs Low power <20 mW per wafer with power pulsing 4 deep buffer for bunch train

21. SiD Integrated Tracking Silicon Tracker is fast (1 BX only) Silicon is robust (No HV trips) Tracking System VXD Si Main Tracker Ecal

22. Pixel Vertex Tracker VXT FNAL Mech Design SLAC Group Marty Breidenbach Su Dong Nick Sinev (Oregon) Marty’s Idea: Short Column CCD Challenges: Readout Speed, Current Supply, Material Budget, Backgrounds Yale/Oregon

23. Si Tracking Physics Premium on Superb Momentum Resolution Challenges Low Material Budget Robust Pattern Recognition  p/p 2 ~ 2 x 10 - 5 0.5% SLAC Group N. Graf J. Jaros T. Nelson R. Partridge See Tim Nelson’s Talk in the Breakout Sessions

24. Si Microstrip Development KPiX Compatible Sensor Designed 92 x 92 mm 2 1840 sense lines < 5  m resolution Submitting to HPK Double Metal Traces Connect Strips to KPiX Kapton Cable Design (UNM/SLAC)

25. Si Sensor Module/Mechanics Sensor Module Tiles Tracker Cylinders, Endcaps Kapton cables route signals and power to endcap modules Next steps: FEA and Prototyping Tracker Design FNAL/SLAC

26. Machine-Detector Interface Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC ( L,E,P) measurements: Luminosity, Energy, Polarization Forward Region Detectors Collimation and Backgrounds IR Design and Detector Assembly EMI (electro-magnetic interference) in IR MDI-related Experiments at SLAC’s End Station A Collimator Wakefield Studies (T-480) Energy spectrometer prototypes (T-474/491 and T-475) IR background studies for IP BPMs (T-488) EMI studies Beam Instrumentation Experiments in ESA Rf BPM prototypes for ILC Linac (part of T-474) Bunch length diagnostics for ILC and LCLS (includes T-487) See Mike Woods’ talk in the Breakout Sessions

27. ILC Test Beams in ESA 50 Participants at SLAC in 2006 for this program 18 from SLAC + 32 users 18 Institutions participated in 2006 beam tests and measurements Birmingham U., Cambridge U., Daresbury, DESY, Dubna, Fermilab, KEK, Lancaster U., Leland H.S., LLNL, Manchester U., Notre Dame U., Oxford U., Royal Holloway U., SLAC, UC Berkeley, UC London, U. Oregon Runs in 2006, 2007, and 2008 (planned) Precision Energy Spectrometers Needed to Measure Energy to 200ppm

28. MDI Activities IR Design Pair Backgrounds Surface Assembly SLAC MDI Group Tom Markiewicz (ILC) Takashi Maruyama Ken Moffeit Mike Woods

29. SiD’s Next Steps Optimize SiD Design, Grow the Collaboration, Write an LOI Simulation/Reconstruction Code Make PFA into a design tool, Complete detailed tracker simulation, Perfect Forward Pattern Recognition Benchmarking/Analysis/Design Optimization Optimize Global Parameter, Optimize Subsystem Parameteres, Develop Full MC Benchmark Analyses. Ecal Fab and Test full KPiX Prototype, Evaluate new Si Sensors, Begin Mechanical Design,Build Ecal Prototype Tower, Beam Test Main Tracker Fab and Test Tracker Si Sensor, Prototype Sensor Modules, Establish Si Lab, Beam test Vertex Tracker Evaluate Performance, Continue with Mechanical Design (with FNAL), Study Power Distribution

30. Expanding Effort on SiD We have a good start on optimizing the SiD design. There’s progress with the addition of a new SiD Mechanical Engineer (due~Oct. 1), plans underway for a Si Lab for sensor testing and development, growing involvement from SLAC Users and the International Community, and progress on detector R&D. But the present program must grow if we and our International colleagues are to prepare the SiD LOI, and the Engineering Design which follows, on the WWS timetable. SLAC is a natural site to lead ILC detector development with our user community, sister laboratories, and international partners. We have much of the needed engineering, construction facilities, large detector experience, computing and simulation infrastructure, and test beams, and can serve as a center for design and analysis activity.

31. Backup Slides

32. SiD @ SLAC: Physics Benchmarking Evaluating Detector Performance Requirements Full MC Physics Analyses ZH  qqbb ZH  X

33. SiD@SLAC: People SiD Department Marty Breidenbach John Jaros SiD Sim/Recon Norman Graf Ron Cassell Tony Johnson Jeremy McCormick SiD Ecal Electronics Gunther Haller Dieter Freytag Ryan Herbst SiD Tracking Tim Nelson Rich Partridge SiD MDI/Polarization Tom Markiewicz Mike Woods Ken Moffeit Takashi Maruyama SiD Benchmarking Tim Barklow SiD Vertex Detector Su Dong

34. More Information and Meeting Schedules are on SiD Webpage: http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/

35. Guide to ILC Speak ILCSC International Linear Collider Steering Committee, chartered by ICFA to realize the ILC. ILCSC chose the technology, established the GDE, hired the Director, facilitates getting support, and provides oversight. GDE Global Design Effort. Under Barry Barish’s direction, the GDE is the international team designing, developing, and now engineering the ILC. Next step, Machine EDR. WWS World Wide Study (of Physics and Detectors for the Linear Collider). Grass Roots organization of the detector and physics communities, led by Brau, Richard, and Yamamoto. WWS organizes detector R&D and detector concept studies, and has developed a detector roadmap. RDR/DCR The Reference Design Report, outlining the machine baseline design and costs and the Detector Concept Report, making the case for ILC physics and detectors. EDRs Engineering Design Reports for the machine and detector, due 2010, which will serve as the proposal to World Governments to construct the ILC and its Detectors.