1. ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ETEC 590 E-PORTFOLIO Master of Educational Technology (MET)

2. Audience Criteria (Check off)  Is stated and defined  Is relevant and applicable  Is discussed and explained in reasonable detail  Remains implied throughout the project Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

3. Purpose Criteria (Check off)  Is stated and explained in reasonable detail  Is relevant and applicable to the target audience  Complements and supports the metaphor  Is reflected in the content throughout the project  Is reflective and introspective in nature Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

4. Artifacts Criteria (Check off)  Demonstrate personal, professional, and educational growth  Are varied in selection  Are relevant and applicable to overall theme and metaphor  Are at least ten in number  Are meaningful and purposeful  Complements and supports the purpose Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

5. Metaphor Criteria (Check off)  Is personal  Is unique  Is sensible, reasonable, and appropriate  Is intriguing, interesting, and/or compelling  Is meaningful and purposeful Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

6. Reflections  Criteria (Check off)  Are meaningful and purposeful  Show personal, professional, and educational growth throughout the MET journey  Are supportive, applicable, and relevant to the artifacts  Demonstrate accumulated knowledge, skill, and learning Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

7. Multimedia Criteria (Check off)  Is varied in number and in type  Is relevant and applicable to MET reflections and MET journey  Is embedded correctly for viewing  Is sourced/documented Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

8. Tour Guide Criteria (Check off)  Is easy to understand and to follow  Is articulate  Is not too long (i.e. 3-5 minutes)  Is operational  Is in video format  Is of reasonable quality in audio and in video production Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

9. Navigation Criteria (Check off)  Is user-friendly (i.e. easy and simple to scroll through portfolio content and to click on hyperlinks and multimedia)  Is not cluttered (i.e. not too multi- layered)  Is organized, using tabs, headings, menu, categories, and/or headers Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

10. Content Organization Criteria (Check off)  Is reader-friendly  Is visually appealing  Is relevant and applicable to the MET reflections and the overall MET journey  Uses paragraph formatting  Includes various scholarly references and citations  Is meaningful and purposeful Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

11. Visual Presentation Criteria (Check off)  Is aesthetically pleasing  Is creative  Is unique Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

12. Design Criteria (Check off)  Is visually appealing  Uses a variety of creative and artistic features that capture attention  Is relevant and applicable to theme and metaphor  Is unique Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

13. Style Criteria (Check off)  Is personal  Is unique  Is interesting, intriguing, captivating, and/or compelling  Is visually appealing Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

14. Conventions Criteria (Check off)  No multiple spelling or grammatical errors  Use of a variety of sentence structures  No unintended colloquialisms and clichés  No non-standard English  Appropriate use of capitalizations and punctuation  No overall use of wordiness Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress

15. Documentation Criteria (Check off)  Is cited and referenced according to APA formatting  Is cited and referenced correctly and appropriately throughout the project  Is varied, using at least 10 scholarly materials (e.g. e-articles, e-journals, Web sites)  > Includes a bibliography Grade (Check off)  Pass  In progress