1. California Public Utilities Commission Sub Meter Protocol Workshop George Bellino Project Engineer Infrastructure Commercialization 27 Oct 2011

2. Optimal Use Case Scenario The Customer plugs in anywhere to charge (120V Outlet/240V EVSE/DCFC) – at home, friends home, public, workplace, commercial, etc. The Utility is able to identify the PEV load associated to the Vehicle ID which is associated to a Utility customer account which is associated to the location’s Primary Meter. The PEV electricity consumption is separately measured using a sub meter which provides a recording of the total kWh usage measurement with time stamps (TOU). The Utility receives the sub meter electricity useage data with the association information - bills the customer account associated to the Vehicle ID at the appropriate EV rate; and subtracts the kWh useage from the associated Primary Meter owner’s account. 27 Oct 20112CPUC Sub Meter Protocol Workshop Other loads Sub Meter Smart Charging

3. Attributes Communications – standards based ability to collect energy consumption data and convey data to Utility accounting back office – Association – ability to connect sub meter to primary meter for subtractive billing Certification – ability to verify accuracy of sub meter measurements Standardization – prescribed national standards specifying requirements, technology implementation, and certification process Accountability – ownership and responsibility for certification, accounting, billing, data processing, aggregation services, etc. Cost Effective – least cost impact to consumer, utility, and providers 27 Oct 20113CPUC Sub Meter Protocol Workshop

4. On Vehicle Sub Metering Communications – SAE J2836/J2847/J2931 addressing PEV-Utility bi-directional communications messaging and protocols (PLC, Telematics, WiFi, etc.) – Capability to receive and respond to DR, load management, and Pricing signals – addresses Association (SEP2.0 Application Layer Standard) – Will support energy consumption TOU data collection and communications Association – Standards are implementing function as part of communications initialization process Vehicle ID associated to EUMD (Energy Unit Measurement Device/Sub Meter) and authentication/registration to the Premise Meter – On Vehicle Sub Meter permanently associated to PEV 27 Oct 2011CPUC Sub Meter Protocol Workshop4

5. On Vehicle Sub Metering Certification – Based on technology implementation – removable hardware device versus embedded software and microchip – Embedded software and microchip preferred for On Vehicle sub metering – OEMs are experts at vehicle certification processes - example: can be calibrated and certified using Service Technician Software Diagnostics tools. Standardization – Solution needs to be nationally standardized - commonized compatible solution for component/software technology, communications, and certification – standardized communications interfaces and data format – May require modifications (paradigm shifts) in policy and regulation as well as existing standards – example: revenue grade accuracy for sub meters versus utility owned primary meters/direct access – Single standard solution for PEV sub metering desired – avoid potential complexities with cascading sub meters 27 Oct 2011CPUC Sub Meter Protocol Workshop5

6. On Vehicle Sub Metering Accountability – Ownership and responsibility for certification, accounting, billing On Vehicle Sub Meter owned by the customer – responsible for vehicle sub meter calibration and certification – analogy: smog checks/regular maintenance checks OEM responsibility and Warranty implications TBD Who does billing – Aggregator/3 rd Party Clearing House Or Utility – Inter Utility accounting and billing processes a potential issue – Revenue stream for Aggregator/3 rd Party Clearing House – Variability in billing models – subscriber fee and time based – middle man between customer and Utility Cost Effectiveness – No out of pocket installation cost and external product price impact – No rate basing issues – Alleviates product variability potentially affecting compatibility – OEM challenge are the integration costs dependent on technology and certification requirements 27 Oct 2011CPUC Sub Meter Protocol Workshop6

7. On Vehicle Sub Metering Basic Advantages – Meter permanently associated to vehicle Supports potential roaming issues – Meters all levels of charging PEV energy consumption Supports requirement for validating and allocating LCFS credits – Potentially least cost impact Alleviates cost/price impacts for externalities – OEM telematics service providers can provide aggregator services through back office server cloud API to utility, HAN, 3 rd Party Energy Suppliers undergoing standardization – PEV-Utility Communications standards processes are in place – Less susceptible to tampering and vandalism 27 Oct 2011CPUC Sub Meter Protocol Workshop7