Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample.

Published by Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample."— Presentation transcript:

1 Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago @ FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample Descriptions (2)LVL1 Rate & Threshold Estimation (3) “Rough” Significance Estimation (w/o FTK) (4) Summary & Plan Contents

2 2 Samples used for the analysis > All has been done using Atlfast simulation, except for Erik’s L1 Parameterization(derived from full simulation) > Signal H/Abb -> 4 b’s : generated with Pythia, where M A = 500 GeV, tan  = 30. (Xsec ~4 pb) > Backgrounds : - Pythia dijet samples (minPt cut = 10-90 GeV). - Pythia bbbar samples (minPt cut = 10-90 GeV). - Pythia ttbar * SHERPA samples available from Erik. (not in this talk.) Note : typical Xsec for dijet ~  b (> 10^6 larger than signal)

3 3 Comparisons of 2 Generators with 4j at 40 GeV SHERPA (Erik’s) (old?) PYTHIA Y/pt cut Xsec  (  b) eff *10^4 4j(40GeV ) Rate (Hz) @ 10^33 eff*10^4 4j(40GeV ) Rate (Hz) @ 10^33 15 2200 1e-50.00210.04710.8 20 780 1.185.80.2822.8 25 340 1.240.80.4817.2 30 170 2.440.81.6229.2 35 95 3.230.42.8928.6 40 56 5.128.64.2124.8 45 35 9.834.36.6724.6 75 4.4 5524.251.124.0

4 4 Trigger Turn-on Curve LVL1 8x8 Et cut @ 40 GeV Atlfast jet Et > At 95% efficiency ; LVL1Et = ~0.82 * AtlfastEt – 32. > At 50% efficiency ; LVL1Et = ~0.92 * AtlfastEt – 24.

5 5 J1 : Single Jet Trigger @ L=2x10 33 200 Hz 20 Hz 200 Hz 20 Hz No phase spaceNo statistics 200 Hz (LVL1 out): Jet Et > ~ 200 GeV, 8x8 Calo > ~ 160 GeV 20 Hz (HLT out) : Jet Et > ~ 350 GeV, 8x8 Calo > ~~

6 6 J2 : 2 Jets Trigger Rate @ L=2x10 33 200 Hz 20 Hz 200 Hz 20 Hz It seems current trigger requirement (20Hz @ HLT) 100% prohibits us from working on Jet calib. using Z (->bb) mass peak.

7 7 J3 : 3 Jets Trigger Rate @ L=2x10 33 200 Hz 20 Hz 200 Hz 20 Hz > Relevant trigger for our signal, H/Abb, H->hh analysis > Looks very challenging to obtain even Z(->bb)+ high pt jet events. Needless to say, would be really nice if we could lower thresholds !

8 8 J4 : 4 Jets Trigger Rate @ L=2x10 33 200 Hz 20 Hz 200 Hz 20 Hz > Statistics not enough. Need to generate more. > Should check with SHERPA samples. > Baseline trigger for the H/Abb, H->hh, 4jets analysis

9 9 Corresponding Points w.r.t. Trigger Rate 1J @ 0.2KHz 1J @ 2 KHz 1J @ 20 KHz 2J @ 0.2KHz 2J @ 2 KHz 2J @ 20 KHz These two variables correspond between 50 ~ 90% efficiency line w.r.t. trigger rate.

10 10 All(J1,J2,J3,J4) in one together 200 Hz 20 Hz 200 Hz 20 Hz Requiring another jet with the same cut value makes LVL1 rates reduced by a factor of 10. (only true for 2->3->4 (dijet events)) Using Ptmin=30 GeV dijet sample

11 11 Other processes: bb/tt productions PYTHIA pt cut (b)(b) Eff*10^4 4j(40GeV) Rate (Hz) at 10^33 bb158.380.180.15 bb251.380.450.06 bb350.393.50.14 bb450.145.70.08 tt0.00041072.70.04 Very small cross section compared to dijet events, - LVL1 rate from these two is negligible (~ 1% contribution) - but become important when btagged at LVL2.

12 12 Trigger Rate/Threshold Summary 200 Hz @ 2x10 33 1J2J3J4J TDR180-20017075-9055-65 Atlfast Et~200~160~ 90~ 55 8x8 Calo Et~160~120~ 55~ 35 20 Hz @ 10 34 J1J2J3J4 TDR400350165110 Atlfast Et (@ 2x10 33 ) ~ 400 (320) ~350 (250) ~ 170 (130) ~ 110 (90) Comparisons with TDR value : no pile-up, e.t.c. > Now pretty sure that the numbers in TDR(1J400 e.t.c.) is close to or exactly the “offline” quality jet Et such as Atlfast Jet. > We should start with those values and see how much FTK improves.

13 13 Sensitivity Study w/o FTK To setup “baseline point” to be compared. > 4 Jet Trigger Default Requirement w/o FTK : - HLT : Jet Et (atlfast) > 90 GeV (~ 20 Hz @ 2*10^{33}) - Higher threshold on 1 st and 2 nd jets. (200,150) > After this selection, I applied btagging and calculated Ns & Nb. B tagging efficiency : - 50 % for real b quark - 10 % for charm quark - 1% for other jets (mistag) (Randomized tagging) Summing event tagging probability, where each jet has a prob. depending on KFJET (ID), to get acceptances instead of counting the number of events. (just weighting). Because of too low efficiency. So stat. uncertainty is huge in the following numbers.(from next page) -> Need more stat. anyway. For signal, M A = 500 GeV, tan  =30. For bkg, minPt = 75 dijet.

14 14 Prelim. of Prelim. Results Selection Variables : (200,150,50,30) & (200,150,90,90) L= 30 fb -1eff SS(500)BS/BS/sqrt(B) (200,100,50,30)1.7e-1218285.9e+83.7e-5(0.9) + 1st bjet0.9e-2111531.4e+77.9e-4(3.0) + 2nd bjet4.1e-251473.7e+51.3e-2(8.4) + 3rd bjet1.5e-21942115460.17(18.1) + 4th bjet0.4e-33892081.87(27) L= 30 fb -1eff SS(500)BS/BS/sqrt(B) (200,100,90,90)1.9e-224476.4e+73.8e-5(0.3) + 1st bjet9.5e-311871.4e+68.4e-4(1.0) + 2nd bjet4.4e-35451021095.4e-3(1.7) + 3rd bjet1.6e-320611800.17(6) + 4th bjet4.8e-461371.64(10) “Do not pay attention absolute values yet”. (Too good significance.) - Trying to understand (But relative comparison should be OK at some level)

15 15 Other Backgrounds L= 30 fb -1dijetbbtt (200,100,50,30)5.9e+82.0e+65.7e+5 + 1st bjet1.4e+74.9e+566822 + 2nd bjet3.7e+5850937486 + 3rd bjet115462427375 + 4th bjet208456.7 L= 30 fb -1dijetbbtt (200,100,90,90)6.4e+72.8e+5157800 + 1st bjet1.4e+6617415748 + 2nd bjet102109124501347 + 3rd bjet1180143862 + 4th bjet37161 Overall : Too low numbers compared to previous study (1997). -> under investigation (Stat. is not enough) As btag increased, heavy quark production becomes relevant.

16 16 Summary & Plan Tried to understand LVL1 calo. response Extracted Et threshold @ 200Hz and 20Hz for J1, J2, J3, J4 trigger table, now have better understanding. Tried to calculate signal significance with 30fb-1, but seems bkg rate is too low, giving too high significance. - Need to check with more stat. To make more realistic scenario, - Full simulation for signal events (also some of bkg?). - High luminosity effects have to be considered. - Additional cuts like Mbb mass window. Also nice to see 3jets trigger as well. Athena version : change to 11.0.x - Need validation. Study on the FTK simulation

Download ppt "Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample."

Similar presentations

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.

H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.

Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
Alain Romeyer - January 20051 Light higgs decay in SUSY cascade - Status report Introduction Trigger efficiency B tagging Jet calibration Invariant mass.

Alain Romeyer - January Light higgs decay in SUSY cascade - Status report Introduction Trigger efficiency B tagging Jet calibration Invariant mass.
Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005.

Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005.
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.

Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.
FTK Studies: H  hh  bbbb FTK Physics Case Meeting 11/03/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.

FTK Studies: H  hh  bbbb FTK Physics Case Meeting 11/03/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.

Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Update on H/Abb -> 4b’s process (4jet Trigger) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on Sep. 7 th, 2006.

Update on H/Abb -> 4b’s process (4jet Trigger) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on Sep. 7 th, 2006.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.

Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.

Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Progress on FTK Studies FTK Physics Case Meeting 07/20/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.

Progress on FTK Studies FTK Physics Case Meeting 07/20/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.

1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.

1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
Status Report on hbb Analysis Jyothsna Rani for the hbb group Andy, Avto, Marine, Tim, Boris All D0 Meeting 28 th January 2005 28 th January 2005.

Status Report on hbb Analysis Jyothsna Rani for the hbb group Andy, Avto, Marine, Tim, Boris All D0 Meeting 28 th January th January 2005.
Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.

Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.

Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.

FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google