1. Software Performance Engineering Steve Chenoweth CSSE 375, Rose-Hulman Tues, Oct 23, 2007

2. 2 Today Software Performance Engineering – this (with its own short HW, due Wed 11:55PM). Software Performance Engineering – this (with its own short HW, due Wed 11:55PM). Assign HW6: Programming Style – Due Mon, Oct 29. Assign HW6: Programming Style – Due Mon, Oct 29. Team work time. Team work time.

3. 3 Software Performance Engineering Closely related to yesterday’s Code Tuning Closely related to yesterday’s Code Tuning Issue is this: Issue is this: –On small or familiar projects, you can ignore performance until integration / system test, then tune to get it. –On large or unfamiliar projects, this doesn’t work at all! Related topics – Responsiveness and scalability. Related topics – Responsiveness and scalability. Many large systems are sold based on “capacity.” Many large systems are sold based on “capacity.” What can you do, related to software construction, to make high performance happen? What can you do, related to software construction, to make high performance happen?

4. 4 So, what does work then? Software performance engineering (SPE) – means planning and controlling the performance all the way thru development. Software performance engineering (SPE) – means planning and controlling the performance all the way thru development. A similar approach can be used on other quality attributes – security and availability, for example. A similar approach can be used on other quality attributes – security and availability, for example.

5. 5 How’s SPE work? Connie Smith, at CMU, invented SPE – Ref http://www.perfeng.com/papers/bestprac.pdf. Connie Smith, at CMU, invented SPE – Ref http://www.perfeng.com/papers/bestprac.pdf. http://www.perfeng.com/papers/bestprac.pdf Usual methodology – Usual methodology – –Start with performance & capacity requirements – numbers – call these “targets.” –Use a spreadsheet. –Put someone in charge. –During design, budget requirements into software & hardware. –Use these as constraints on development. –As you code, do unit testing, estimate & compare to budgets. –In system test, compare guesses to reality. –Refine your ability to guess over multiple releases. Req Des Code Test

6. 6 SPE Example: Perf Requirements You have a system that monitors economic transactions for Amazon.com. You have a system that monitors economic transactions for Amazon.com. Let’s look at critical use cases / scenarios: Let’s look at critical use cases / scenarios: –It sees 60,000 transactions per hour (peak hour). –Each validated transaction updates status and activity information in the memory of a server. –You have five displays for people watching. They see exception transactions and statistics. –Oh, and exception transactions need to be shown, too. –These screens should automatically update every 10 seconds. –Every 10 minutes the in-memory info is saved to disk, using SQL-Server.

7. 7 SPE Example: Architecture Design looks something like this figure. Design looks something like this figure. 60,0000 trans/hr = 1000 trans/min = 16.7 trans/sec = 60 ms/trans. 60,0000 trans/hr = 1000 trans/min = 16.7 trans/sec = 60 ms/trans. Naïvely assume each of the 3 functions on a trans takes equal time. Naïvely assume each of the 3 functions on a trans takes equal time. So, they each have to be done in 20 ms. So, they each have to be done in 20 ms. But there are also two performance “lumps” – But there are also two performance “lumps” – –Updating the 5 displays every 10 sec, and –Writing the memory data to disk every 10 min! Trans validate Find exceptions Update displays Put in DB Update stats Trans Input Stream 60k/hr 20 ms? Every 10 sec Every 10 min

8. 8 SPE Example: Question Can you assume that these “lumps” can be tuned out of the system during testing? Can you assume that these “lumps” can be tuned out of the system during testing? –Why or why not? Trans validate Find exceptions Update displays Put in DB Update stats Trans Input Stream 60k/hr 20 ms? Every 10 sec Every 10 min

9. 9 SPE Example: Answer Not unless you’re used to dealing with such things already! Not unless you’re used to dealing with such things already! If not, better budget for them, too: If not, better budget for them, too: –Divide the 60 ms/trans by 5, not by 3. –Each of the 3 oringinal functions shown gets 12 ms/trans. –Display refresh gets 1/5 of every CPU second, or 200 ms. So 5 displays refreshed every 10 sec = 1 every 2 sec. Each display refresh gets a 400 ms budget. –DB write gets 1/5 of every CPU second, or 200 ms, also. Over 10 min, it then gets 200 * 60 * 10 ms = 2 min of CPU time. But, this had better be distributed evenly! Trans validate Find exceptions Update displays Put in DB Update stats Trans Input Stream 60k/hr 12 ms 200 ms 2 min

10. 10 But… This is still optimistic! This is still optimistic! It assumes you have all the CPU time for your application, and It assumes you have all the CPU time for your application, and It assumes your transactions aren’t “lumpy,” and It assumes your transactions aren’t “lumpy,” and That the system won’t grow. That the system won’t grow. A more conservative start would be to cut all the targets in half, on the previous page. A more conservative start would be to cut all the targets in half, on the previous page.

11. 11 Result: Budgets for each programmer, during construction I’m doing the input validation feature. I’m doing the input validation feature. I know from day 1 that it has to run in a budget of 50% * 12 ms = 6 ms on each transaction. I know from day 1 that it has to run in a budget of 50% * 12 ms = 6 ms on each transaction. I can design to that. I can design to that. I can test that, at least tentatively, even in unit testing! This will give me estimates to see if I’m “close.” I can test that, at least tentatively, even in unit testing! This will give me estimates to see if I’m “close.” To do that, I need to “instrument” my code. How? To do that, I need to “instrument” my code. How? Real results feed back to the person in charge of the performance spreadsheet. Real results feed back to the person in charge of the performance spreadsheet. –Their spreadsheet shows if we still meet the requirements targets. –They are also involved in system test, where we get the real results. We have an informed engineering guess, at all times, about “whether we can make it” on performance. We have an informed engineering guess, at all times, about “whether we can make it” on performance.

12. 12 A real SPE spreadsheet has multiple dimensions We looked at CPU time. We looked at CPU time. Other things often budgeted and tracked thru development include “whatever may be of concern,” like: Other things often budgeted and tracked thru development include “whatever may be of concern,” like: –Memory space –Disk I/O time –Communications time

13. 13 Related considerations Real risk determines how much time to spend on getting performance (or any other quality attribute) right. Real risk determines how much time to spend on getting performance (or any other quality attribute) right. Need to focus on critical use cases / scenarios. Need to focus on critical use cases / scenarios. Discover competing needs for resources like CPU time. Discover competing needs for resources like CPU time. Make initial guesses about how to divide these, cycle back and improve on those guesses. Make initial guesses about how to divide these, cycle back and improve on those guesses. Start simply. Start simply. At some point in refinement, however, you have to start considering queuing effects in a more sophisticated way, to be more accurate. At some point in refinement, however, you have to start considering queuing effects in a more sophisticated way, to be more accurate. Someone needs to be in charge of the spreadsheet, and of making performance “happen.” Someone needs to be in charge of the spreadsheet, and of making performance “happen.” Getting good numbers to start with is a “fall out” advantage of this process. Getting good numbers to start with is a “fall out” advantage of this process. Most performance successes are due to good design. Most performance successes are due to good design.

14. 14 One skill required for this - Estimating You need to practice guessing, then You need to practice guessing, then Have a way to check if you’re right! Have a way to check if you’re right! Short example exercise – Short example exercise – –How many piano tuners are there in Terre Haute? Image from www.pianoacoustics.com/.www.pianoacoustics.com/

15. 15 HW activity – Take the architecture we already used as an example. Take the architecture we already used as an example. Now assume that we get the following feedback from the designers of each of the subsystems shown: Now assume that we get the following feedback from the designers of each of the subsystems shown: –The “Trans validate” code is now estimated as only half as complex as the code in the “Update stats” and “Find exceptions” routines. (Time complexity, that is.) –Saving all the statistics to the DB must be one “synchronized” action every 10 min. This is now estimated to take 5 sec. The remaining DB tasks, however, can be distributed evenly over each 10 min interval. Reallocate the budgets accordingly, assuming we want to be “conservative” and only use 50% of available CPU time! Reallocate the budgets accordingly, assuming we want to be “conservative” and only use 50% of available CPU time! Make clear any guesses or assumptions you made. Make clear any guesses or assumptions you made. Turn this in as the “Software Performance HW” assignment, by 11:55 PM, Wed, Oct 24. Turn this in as the “Software Performance HW” assignment, by 11:55 PM, Wed, Oct 24.