Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Training Investigators to Work in a Correctional Setting Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders July 2006
2
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Training Objectives: Debunk myths - the criticality of training investigators Agency investigators Non-agency investigators Identify investigative competencies “Hard” and “soft” competencies Overview training techniques Idaho Examine the need to “demystifying” the investigative process for employees and offenders Review the impact of improved investigations
3
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Why Train Investigators? De-bunking myths: Criminal allegations not a priority Corrections employees know how to investigate Investigators from non-corrections agencies are more competent Cases lack “jury appeal” so why bother Use institutional rules to “punish”
4
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Criminal allegations not a priority Perpetrators are already serving time Minimal impact on the community Apathy of the public, outside investigators, prosecutors Resources are finite
5
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Corrections employees know how to investigate Decline in pre-service and in-service training Criminal vs. rule violations Skills First responder Report writing Testimony Equipment Experience
6
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigators from non-corrections agencies are more competent Expose to correctional environments Dynamics of correctional environments Skills Interviewing offenders Knowledge Where is the evidence? Attitude
7
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Cases lack “jury appeal” so why bother Impact on facility safety Impact on employees Impact on offenders Impact on the community Legal obligations of the correctional organization To offenders To employees
8
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Use institutional rules to “punish” Competent and fair application of rules and sanctioning Facility security Deterrent impact Prevention – employees and offenders Patterns of indifference Beyond public scrutiny
9
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Memoranda of Agreements Establish responsibilities under statute Time lines, notifications Authority to request investigations Triggers for investigations Criminal vs. administrative Define administrative control Techniques to be used Chain of command, need to know Coverage Employees, contractors, vendors, etc.
10
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Memoranda of Agreements, cont. Identify and define critical relationships EMS SATC Crime Lab Prosecutor Specify treatment of victims, witnesses, perpetrators
11
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Memoranda of Agreements, cont. Defines outcomes Referrals for prosecution Referrals for administrative actions (employees and offenders) Defines responsibilities for media, public disclosure Addresses aftermath management Release of information Addresses costs
12
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Flow from memoranda of agreements Agency investigators Other investigating agencies (if not the corrections agency) Impact of how complaints/allegations are received Investigative Protocols Checklists Report formats
13
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies: First Responders Identify a crime may have been committed First aid Separate Notify Secure the scene
14
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Statutes and Directives: PREA MOAs CBAs Agency policies/procedures/protocols Format of reports Findings vs. conclusions Prosecution linked How complaints received The criminal justice system
15
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Dynamics of a correctional environment Offender/offender interactions – “job description” Employee/offender interactions Ability to see offender as a victim Dynamics of sexual assault in a correctional environment “Consensual” Same sex dynamics Profile of offenders PTSD, Survivor
16
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Evidence in a correctional environment Phone records, commissary, logs, cameras, housing records, medical/mh records, requests for changes, classification file, disciplinary records, grievances, inmate file, visitor lists.. Checklist
17
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Facility operations Classification of offenders Programming Physical plant Staffing History of allegations Commissary, etc. Offender movement
18
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Responding Checklists Resources, SART, SANE Collection of DNA or other perishable evidence Use of equipment Digital cameras, specialized equipment Chain of custody Safeguarding victim, witnesses, etc.
19
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Investigations 101 Interviews and Interrogations Victims and vulnerable populations Sexual assault victims Witnesses, perpetrators Options: Polygraph, voice stress analyzer, etc. Mental health involvement Removal from facility Other
20
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Ability to manage the victim, witnesses and perpetrator(s) Timing and sequencing Employees or offenders
21
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Investigation Management Investigative records and notes Files Formats Logs Sequencing Use of teams Gender of investigators Supervision of the investigation Use of Garrity and Miranda Link analysis
22
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Reporting writing
23
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Dress
24
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Depositions Court testimony
25
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Investigative Competencies Aftermath Recognizing crisis Offenders Employees In themselves
26
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Training Techniques Academy – Investigations 101 Also report writing Shadowing Mock trials, mock crime scenes Victim advocates Sexual assault treatment responders
27
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Demystifying the Investigative Process Clarity, transparency Prevention/deterrence Cooperation Code of silence – offenders and employees Why things happen Rights and responsibilities False reports Accountability WIFM
28
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Idaho Selection Process Application References Skills test Background check Check references Psych screening
29
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Idaho, continued Skills Written communication Interpersonal skills/verbal communication Connect with employees Connect with offenders Computer knowledge (keyboarding, use of Internet, etc.) Organizational skills Leadership skills Teamwork (ability to work with a team)
30
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Idaho, continued Knowledge College Correctional knowledge (years of experience) POST credits Speak Spanish (a plus) Investigative background/experience
31
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Idaho, continued Abilities To travel To handle high stress situations To be on call To be unbiased/open minded; ability to see inmates as victims To conceptualize investigative work To maintain confidentiality Insightful To multi-task To handle large workload
32
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Impact of Improved Investigations Safer facilities Deterrent/prevention Understanding = improved morale Begins culture change and staff buy-in Increases likelihood for prosecution Gives agency claim of qualified immunity from civil suit Transparency Safer communities
33
Developed by Susan McCampbell under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Training Investigators Opportunities for collaboration between prosecutors and corrections
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.