Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

23-May-03 Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning James D. Myers Erin A. Campbell-Stone & James E. McClurg Department of Geology.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "23-May-03 Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning James D. Myers Erin A. Campbell-Stone & James E. McClurg Department of Geology."— Presentation transcript:

1 23-May-03 Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning James D. Myers Erin A. Campbell-Stone & James E. McClurg Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Wyoming

2 Physical Geology: GEOL1100 180-200 students per semester traditional lecture-lab –one lecture section –10-13 lab sections with < 20 students low student attendance/involvement instructor, full-time lab coordinator, 4-5 TAs

3 Physical Geology - Redesign integrate reading-lab-lecture three-week integrated learning module extensive use of technology lectures reorganized to combine variety of educational techniques lab incorporates: group learning, hands- on, reading assignments reading assignments mandatory

4 Physical Geology – Learning Modules consists of: –week 1: reading questionnaire –week 2: lab activities –week 3: lecture different modules overlap –single week do parts of three different modules –each concentrates on different subject

5 Physical Geology – Learning Modules

6 Physical Geology – Reading Questionnaires introduces topics done individually submitted online insures background preparation done

7 Physical Geology – Lab uses –collaborative learning –hands-on activity –strong web component –virtual experiments –multimedia

8 Physical Geology – Lab each lab group has work station with dedicated, networked computer

9 Physical Geology – Lecture final component of learning module follows first two components student applies their new knowledge variety of goals relies heavily on Web site lecture format varied –introduced limited active learning sessions

10 Physical Geology – Lecture Changes some changed from passive to active learning environment increased student-instructor and student- student interaction during lecture provided limited formative assessment engaged a larger percentage of the students in lecture – not just the “responders”

11 Physical Geology – Lecture Outcome student involvement grew during semester improved performance on exams for students attending lecture

12 Physical Geology – Lecture Limitations many students still not engaged active learning only small percentage of lecture sessions lots of added administrative work formative assessment limited real-time monitoring of student learning limited

13 Solution: Classroom Response Systems record and analyze student response in real time Classroom Response System from eInstruction two modes: bookstore, standalone student key pads with receiver – infra-red system

14 CPS Demonstration do quick demonstration

15 Lecture: Enhancing with CPS better in class feedback on student learning ability to “chunk” lectures more effectively reduction of administrative tasks and paper collection permanent quantitative record of student performance more focused assessment of effectiveness

16 Lecture - Types expository: typical lecture enhanced: mini-lectures separated by active learning (CPS) tasks focused: active learning class session focused on single concept/technique

17 Lecture - Expository instructor talks, students listen passive environment benefits –low “risk” for students –provides breather –easy fall back position

18 Lecture - Expository introduce ourselves describe regional, national or international geologic events discuss local, state or national policy issues related to geology cover information/topic not in textbook tie current events to subject

19 Lecture – Expository w/ CPS uses CPS for: –opinion surveys –knowledge assessment benefits –no right/wrong answer –provides attendance data –refocuses students without “risk” on their part http://www.gg.uwyo.edu/geol1100

20 Lecture – Enhanced: Details series of mini-lectures separated by activities activities occupy only 5-10 minutes refocus attention combine formative assessment (feedback) and/or active learning exercises done individually or in pairs/groups type of activity varied

21 Lecture – Enhanced: Timeline MinutesActivity 15Mini-lecture on permeability and porosity 10ConcepTest dealing with cone-of- depression 15Mini-lecture on types of aquifers 10Think-pair-share dealing with groundwater recharge http://www.gg.uwyo.edu/geol1100

22 Lecture - Focused focused on a single concept/technique employs multiple active learning tasks think-pair-share always important a worksheet is completed individually and turned in occupies entire class period maximum of one focused lecture per subject topic

23 Lectures – Enhanced w/ CPS mini-lectures separated by active learning tasks –tasks use CPS topic: groundwater timeline –Mini-lecture: The Water Table –Quick-Thinks (CPS) –Mini-lecture: Aquifers and Aquicludes –ConcepTest – Artesian Wells (CPS)

24 Lecture – Focused: Functions summation: used to wrap up a topic, e.g. structural geology extension: introduces concept not previously covered in reading, lab or lecture application: applies previously learned principles/concepts to new situation

25 Lectures – Focused: Example topic: structural geology function: summation timeline –introduction –terminology review (CPS) –vertical motion problem –map details quiz (CPS) –map exercise –core-information exercise –wrap-up (CPS) http://www.gg.uwyo.edu/geol1100

26 CPS Results: Changes lots of more preparation time – 2-3x less content covered –content presented in greater depth –better chance students will retain the information (hope) teaching style must be adjusted –flexible, spontaneous have to “re-educate” students –not used to working in lecture –attitude your are not teaching them – they are getting short changed –tell them up-front why you are making these changes

27 CPS Results: Formative Assessment done early in semester (2/19)

28 CPS Results: Summative Assessment conducted at end of semester (5/9)

29 CPS Results: Class Attendance

30 CPS Results: Adjustments reduce grace period to one week increase attendance points (5 to 20) emphasize academic dishonesty permanent log for sign-ins

31 CPS Results: Recommendations equip all large classrooms in classroom building encourage adoption by other instructors - particularly of large classes explore ways of supporting faculty adopting CPS

32 Suggestions: Implementation alternate CPS function (polls, opinions, learning activities, assessment) credit participation not accuracy (no risk) vary question difficulty limit each CPS session to < 5 questions have a back-up plan (technology & content) if for points, have a sign-in sheet don’t ignore results useful to monitor attendance

33 Suggestions: Getting Started plan ahead provide student grace period conduct technology assistance sessions contact bookstore early (for bookstore model only) practice before hand –technology & style –instructor & students

34 Suggestions: Classroom Environment instructor flexibility essential class “out” of control class size dictates applications students more involved/animated greater understanding of less material formative/summative assessment

35 Suggestions: Potential Problems technology glitches key pad vulnerability complaints about cost potential for cheating

36 Summary active learning makes lecture time more effective –engages student’s brain –keeps them focused on task –breaks monotony students need to “adjust” lecture behavior CPS improves the delivery and effectiveness of active learning –ensures all students participate –provides quantitative formative & summative assessment –reduces administrative overhead CPS is just a tool. Its effectiveness is determined by how well you wield that tool


Download ppt "23-May-03 Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning James D. Myers Erin A. Campbell-Stone & James E. McClurg Department of Geology."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google