Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Prof. Kelly Members: Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Virtual Rumble Strip.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Prof. Kelly Members: Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Virtual Rumble Strip."— Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Prof. Kelly Members: Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Virtual Rumble Strip MDR

2 2 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Background and Motivation  Single Vehicle Roadway Departure (SVRD) Account for 20% of all crashes, but nearly 50% of all fatal crashes  Rumble strips Help prevent SVRD accidents in the outer lanes What about the middle lanes?  No system in place to warn people drifting between lanes on a fast highway.

3 3 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler System Block Diagram

4 4 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Approved MDR Specifications  Settled on a Sensor system. Optical vs. Microwave  Settled on a Design for the Sensor Array. Should it be two rows of sensors or should it be a V formation, how many sensors, etc.  Show that the Sensor Array gives usable results. Show that the sensor array is providing the necessary data to give suitable feedback to the driver.

5 5 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Alternative Sensors  Investigated Microwave Sensors Easy measurements of distances ahead to echo objects. Similar system designed in 1997 called the FSS Highway Stripe. Beyond the Scope of a 1 yr. SDP Keep original focus of an inexpensive alternative

6 6 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Approved MDR Specifications  Settled on a Sensor system. Optical vs. Microwave  Settled on a Design for the Sensor Array. Should it be two rows of sensors or should it be a V formation, how many sensors, etc.  Show that the Sensor Array gives usable results. Show that the sensor array is providing the necessary data to give suitable feedback to the driver.

7 7 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Sensor Hardware  4 different sensors tested Best results came from the 701AL because it uses a Darlington configuration The 701AL is smaller then some of the other sensors tested  14 different colored strips tested on road surface All bright colors appear to reflect very well while all dark colors appear to work poorly This will help sense the road using the lines already laid down

8 8 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Analog Sensor with Digital Output Circuit

9 9 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Operation of Neighboring Sensors

10 10 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Approved MDR Specifications  Settled on a Sensor system. Optical vs. Microwave  Settled on a Design for the Sensor Array. Should it be two rows of sensors or should it be a V formation, how many sensors, etc.  Show that the Sensor Array gives usable results. Show that the sensor array is providing the necessary data to give suitable feedback to the driver.

11 11 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Prototype Five Sensor Array

12 12 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Paint Line Width

13 13 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Car Mounted Array System  Array mounted under of the car  Single line array  13 Sensors will be mounted under the car. 3 Middle sensors 10 Warning sensors

14 14 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Approved MDR Specifications  Settled on a Sensor system. Optical vs. Microwave  Settled on a Design for the Sensor Array. Should it be two rows of sensors or should it be a V formation, how many sensors, etc.  Show that the Sensor Array gives usable results. Show that the sensor array is providing the necessary data to give suitable feedback to the driver.

15 15 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Human Factors  Visual Component First Line of Defense Motion Enhanced Warning Signal (MEWS)  Audio Component Second Line of Defense A graded signal presented in Stereo Two separate tones

16 16 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Warning System  Prototype Drawing of the Warning System

17 17 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Behavioral Changes  Lane Deviation Distribution May compress because drivers get it know how far they can deviate without being warned  Drowsiness Driver may become less attentive to his/her surroundings

18 18 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Looking Ahead  Sensor Array DSP, Gain Block and Noise Filtering Attach Prototype to RC Car  Warning System Build the Prototype Try to implement ways to deal with Behavioral Changes  Questions or Comments

19 19 Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Approved MDR Specifications  Settled on a Sensor system. Optical vs. Microwave  Settled on a Design for the Sensor Array. Should it be two rows of sensors or should it be a V formation, how many sensors, etc.  Show that the Sensor Array gives usable results. Show that the sensor array is providing the necessary data to give suitable feedback to the driver.


Download ppt "Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Prof. Kelly Members: Matt Auby Steve Leblanc Joachim Weyl Mariah Winkler Virtual Rumble Strip."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google